ORIGINAL_ARTICLE
The primary of ethics upon philosophy
This article considers the primacy of ethics upon philosophy in Levinas’s thought. Having focus on “Other” in his philosophy, Levinas looks radically different view at traditional ethics and concepts such as other, face, infinity, transcendence are opposite concepts as I, totality, and imminence. He believes that ethics is primacy upon philosophy and regards ethics as kind of first philosophy which is essentially other than western first philosophy. Of course, Levinas points that first philosophy includes wide realm which epistemology and ontology are its realm. The ethics that levinas defends it, is ethics which its realm is transcendence not immanence. He holds that western philosophy reduced other to same or self and it is in doing so antiethical.
https://philosophy.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_99_69c3e78b1780826c1eec83e1c2c079df.pdf
2012-08-22
24
41
Other
language
ethics
first philosophy
trancedance
same or self and levinas
Mohammad
Asghari
philosophy@tabrizu.ac.ir
1
استادیار دانشگاه تبریز
LEAD_AUTHOR
علیا، مسعود. ( 1388 )، کشف دیگری همراه با لویناس، نشرنی، تهران.
1
- دیویس ، کالین. ( 1386 )، درآمدی بر اندیشۀ لویناس، ترجمۀ مسعود علیا ، انتشارات انجمن
2
و حکمت ، تهران.
3
- فیندلی، جان و بربیج جان.و. ( 1387 )، گفتارهایی درباره فلسفه هگل، ترجمۀ حسن
4
مرتضوی، نشرچشمه، تهران.
5
- دکارت، رنه. ( 1369 )، تأملات در فلسفه اولی، ترجمۀ احمد احمدی، مرکز نشر دانشگاهی،
6
تهران.
7
--------------------(1999)Alterity and Transcendence, trans. Michael B. Smith,
8
London: Athlone Pressand New York: Columbia University Press
9
Levinas, Emmanuel.(1987) Time and the Other. Trans. Richard A. Cohen.
10
Pittsburgh: DuquesneUniversity Press.
11
- ------------------------(1979) Totality and Infinity. Trans. A.Lingis. Pittsburgh:
12
Duquesne University Press.
13
- --------------------(1994)Otherwise than Being or, Beyond Essence. Translated by
14
Alphonso Lingis Martinus Nijhoff Philosophy Texts 3. The Hague/Boston: M.
15
- ------------------------(1990) Nine Talmudic Readings. Trans. Annette Aronowicz.
16
Bloomington: IndianaUniversity Press.
17
--------------------------- (1996)"Transcendence and Height" in Basic Philosophical
18
Writings. Adriaan T. Peperzak, Simon Critchley, and Robert Bernasconi (eds.).
19
Bloomington: Indiana University Press,
20
- Peperzak, Adriaan Theodoor (1997) Beyond. The Philosophy of Emmanuel
21
Levinas. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
22
- Morgan, Michael L. (2007) Discovering Levinas, Cambridge University Press.
23
- Schroeder, Brian (2001) "Abraham and Odyssey" in Melvyn New, Robert
24
Bernasconi, Richard A. Cohen (2001) In proximity: Emmanuel Levinas and the
25
eighteenth century, Publisher Texas Tech University Press.
26
- Thomas, Elisabeth Louise (2004) New Emmanuel Levinas: Ethics, Justice and the
27
Human beyond Being, Taylor & Francis Books, Inc.
28
- Rosenzweig, Franz.( 1985) The Star of Redemption, trans. William W.
29
Hallo,University of Notre Dame Press,
30
- Wyschogrod, Edith (2005)"From ethics to language: imperative of the Other" in
31
Emmanuel Levinas: critical assessment of leading philosophers , edited by
32
Claire Katz with Lara Trout , Vol 1.
33
ORIGINAL_ARTICLE
Universal Logic as a General Theory of Logic
Nowadays, we are confronted with important debates concerning “pluralism”, “monism”, “relativism”, and “absolutism” in logic on the one hand, and “combinations of logics”, and “translations of logics into each other”, on the other hand. In a global reaction to the plurality of logics. Some important researches have been done in the framework of an extensive project called “universal logic” with two readings: 1) “universal logic as the general theory of logic(s)” or “universal logic as a general theory of logic(s)”; 2) “universal logic as the comprehensive logic”, or “super-logic”, or “mother logic”, a notion which encompasses all logics and generates them., The author gives a description as well as an explanation of the first reading, enumerating and evaluating the important constituents, fields, approaches, and methods of enquiry within the framework of “universal logic as the general theory of logic(s)”.
https://philosophy.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_100_63207d8527227b85e8d0267a96eba24c.pdf
2012-08-22
44
61
Logical pluralism
universal logic
general theory of logic(s)
equivalence of logics
combinations of logics
Musa
Akrami
musa.akrami@gmail.com
1
موسی اکرمی دانشیار واحد علوم و تحقیقات دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران
LEAD_AUTHOR
- B 01 Beziau, J.-Y. (2001), “From Paraconsistent Logic to Universal Logic”,
1
SORITES, ISSN 1135-1349, Issue #12. May 2001. pp. 5-32, On-line
2
Version,{http://www.sorites.org/Issue_12/beziau.htm}, Accessed March 12,
3
- B 06 B-eziau, J.-Y. (2006), “13 Questions about Universal Logic: 13 questions to
4
Jean-Yves B´eziau, by Linda Eastwood”, Bulletin of the Section of Logic,
5
Volume 35:2/3 (2006), pp. 133–150
6
- B 09 Beziau, J.-Y. “Is Logic Universal?”
7
{http://philo.at/pipermail/philweb/2009-March/003485.html}, accessed 15/10/2009.
8
- B 90 Béziau, J.-Y. (1990), “Logiques construites suivant les méthodes de da
9
Costa”, Logique et Analyse, 131-132, 259-272.
10
- B 93 Béziau, J.-Y. (1993), “La logique abstraite au sein de la mathématique
11
moderne”, Ruch Filosoficzny, 50 (1993), pp.289-293.
12
- B 94a Béziau, J.-Y. (1994), “De la logique formelle à la logique abstraite”,
13
Boletim da Sociedade Paranaense de Matem ل tica, 14, 41-50.
14
- B 94b Béziau, J.-Y. (1994), “Universal logic”, in T.Childers & O.Majer (eds),
15
Logica’94 - Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium, Philosophia,
16
Prague, pp.73-93.
17
- B 95b Jean-Yves B´eziau, Recherches sur la logique universelle, PhD Thesis,
18
Universit´e Denis Diderot (Paris 7), 1995.
19
- B 97b Béziau, J.-Y. (1997), “Logic may be simple - Logic, congruence and
20
algebra”, Logic and Logical Philosophy, 5, 129-147.
21
- B 98 Béziau, J.-Y. (1998), “Do sentences have identity ?”, in The Paideia Project -
22
Proceedings of the XXth World Congress of Philosophy, http://www.bu.edu/wcp/
23
MainLogi.htm.
24
- B 99b Béziau, J.-Y. (1999), “The future of paraconsistent logic”, to appear in
25
Logical Studies, 2.
26
- B 99c Béziau, J.-Y. (1999), “The mathematical structure of logical syntax”, to
27
appear in Carnielli, W.A. and D’Ottaviano, I.M.L. (eds.), Proceedings of the
28
XIth Brazilian Conference on Mathematical Logic, AMS, Providence.
29
- Barwise, J. and Hammer, E. (1994),“Diagrams and the concept of logical system”
30
in (Gabbay 1994, pp.73-106).
31
- Birkhoff, G. (1940), Lattice theory, AMS, Providence.
32
- Birkhoff, G. (1946), “Universal algebra”, in Comptes Rendus du Premier Congrès
33
Canadien de Mathématiques, University of Toronto Press, Toronto, pp.310-326.
34
- Birkhoff, G. (1976), “The rise of modern algebra to 1936” in Man and Institutions
35
in American Mathematics, Graduate Studies, Texas Technical Studies, 13, 65-85
36
- Birkhoff, G. (1987), “Universal algebra”, in Rota, G.-C. and Oliveira, J.S. (eds.),
37
Selected papers on algebra and topology by Garret Birkhoff, Birkh نuser, Basel,
38
pp.111-115.
39
- Bloom, S. (1984), “Roman Suszko : a reminiscence”, Studia Logica, 43, 313.
40
منطقِ کلی به مثابه ی نظریه ی عمومیِ منطق 61
41
- Bourbaki, N. (1950), “The architecture of mathematics”, American Mathematical
42
Monthly, 57: 4, pp. 221-232. {http://www. math.lsa.umich. edu/~mduchin/ UCD
43
/111/ readings/architecture.pdf}
44
- Brady, Ross (2001), Universal Logic, California: Center for the Study of Language
45
and Information.
46
- Dzik, W. (1981), “The existence of Lindenbaum’s extension is equivalent to the
47
axiom of choice”, Reports on Mathematica Logic, 13, 29-31.
48
-Feferman, Solomon (2006) "What kind of logic is "Independence Friendly" logic?",
49
in Randall E. Auxier and Lewis Edwin Hahn (eds.) The Philosophy of Jaakko
50
Hintikka, Library of Living Philosophers vol. 30, Open Court, 453-469.
51
- Gabbay, D.M. (1994b) (ed.), What is a Logical System ?, Oxford, Clarendon
52
- Gabbay, D.M. (1996), Labelled Deductive Systems, vol.1, Oxford, Clarendon
53
- Girard, Jean-Yves (1987), Linear logic, Theoretical Computer Science, London
54
Mathematical 50:1, pp. 1–102.
55
- Luschei, Eugene (1962), The Logical Systems of Lesniewski. North-Holland.
56
- Porte, J. (1965), Recherches sur la théorie générale des systèmes formels et sur les
57
systèmes connectifs, Gauthier-Villars, Paris & Nauwelaerts, Louvain.
58
- Scott, D.S. (1974), “Completeness and axiomatizability in many-valued logic” in
59
L.Henkin (ed.), Proceedings of the Tarski Symposium, AMS, Providence, 1974,
60
pp.411-435.
61
ORIGINAL_ARTICLE
The Position of Logic in Aristotle`s Divisions of Sciences
One of the subject-matters that Aristotle had raised in his works is the division of sciences. He divides sciences, in different positions of his works, into parts and branches. Aristotle is the first one who articulated logical issues and introduced logic as a science. But in his divisions of sciences seems no name of logic. The question of this article is that where is the position of logic in Aristotle`s divisions of sciences. In this paper, referring to Aristotle works, we attempted to show that logic, by attention to discussions and topics that entails, is one of the parts or branches of the first philosophy and we must consider it as a theoretical science. In Aristotle`s viewpoint, the subject matter of the first philosophy is "being" qua being. But the term "Being" has several meanings; one of them is "being in the sense of true". Aristotle holds that, since all of these senses are synonymous, investigation of them, including the investigation of "true", belong to one science; namely first philosophy. On the other hand logic is the science that is investigating about "true". Therefore logic would be a part or branch of the first philosophy. From viewpoint of Aristotle, logic, at the same time, is an instrumental science. But this instrumentality of logic has no contradictory with the fact that it is a theoretical science. Since what makes a science a theoretical one is the fact that in that science there would be no purpose other than "knowledge"; but what makes a science a non-instrumental one is the fact that in that science there would be no purpose other than "knowledge about the subject matter of that science". Therefore the criterion of "being theoretical" is different from criterion of "being non-instrumental"; and for this reason a science can be a theoretical one, and at the same time be instrumental.
https://philosophy.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_126_5639a01c14b37dfb89535ca63249839e.pdf
2012-08-22
63
96
Aristotle
division of sciences
theoretical sciences
first philosophy
"being"
logic
true
instrumental science
Ahmad Ali
Heidari
aah1342@yahoo.de
1
استادیار دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی
LEAD_AUTHOR
Mehdi
Hatef
2
کارشناسی ارشد دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی
AUTHOR
ارسطو. ( 1378 )، مابعدالطبیعه، ترجمه محمدحسن لطفی، چاپ دوم، تهران، انتشارات طرح نو.
1
- ارسطو. ( 1366 )، متافیزیک(مابعدالطبیعه)، ترجمه شرف الدین خراسانی، چاپ دوم، تهران،
2
انتشارات گفتار.
3
- ارسطو. ( 1378 )، منطق (ارگانون)، ترجمه دکتر میرشمس الدین ادیب سلطانی، چاپ اول،
4
تهران، انتشارات نگاه.
5
- ارسطو. ( 1378 )، اخلاق نیکوماخوس، ترجمه محمدحسن لطفی، چاپ دوم، تهران، انتشارات
6
طرح نو.
7
- ابن سینا. ( 1404 )، الشفا (المنطق) (جلد اول و دوم)، چاپ ؟، قم، مکتبه آیه الله المرعشی.
8
- ابن رشد. ( 1380 )، تفسیر مابعدالطبیعه، چاپ دوم، تهران، انتشارات حکمت.
9
- خواجه نصیر الدین طوسی. ( 1375 )، شرح الأشارات و التنبیهات مع المحاکمات(جلد اول)،
10
چاپ اول، قم، نشر البلاغه.
11
- فارابی. ( 1986 )، کتاب الحروف، چاپ ؟، بیروت، انتشارات دارالمشرق (قابل دسترسی در نرم
12
افزار کتابخانه حکمت اسلامی).
13
- فردریک کاپلستون. ( 1380 )، تاریخ فلسفه(جلد یکم)، ترجمه سید جلال الدین مجتبوی،
14
چاپ چهارم، تهران، انتشارات علمی و فرهنگی و انتشارات سروش.
15
.11-38 ،1385 ، فصلنامۀ معارف عقلی، شمارة 1 ،« ابزاری بودن منطق » . -ایزدی تبار، محمد -Aristotle, (1995), The Complete Works, edited by Jonathan Barnes, fifth printing,
16
Princeton, Princeton University Press.
17
- Taylor. A.E. (1955), Aristotle, an unabridged reprinting of the revised edition, New
18
York, Dover publications, Inc.
19
- J. L. Akcrill (1981), Aristotle; the philosopher, first published, Oxford, Clarendon
20
- W. D. Ross, (1995), Aristotle, sixth edition, London and New York, Routledge.
21
ORIGINAL_ARTICLE
Freud on Ethics: The Equivalence of Evolution of Morality in Individual and Species
The explanation made by Freud for the institution of morality and its relation with human psyche proceeded in two separate projects. At the first, it is described the establishment of moral sense in individual’s psyche, and at the second an explanation for its generation and continuity in human species is presented. This essay deals with the relation between these two. First, two description related to these projects are presented in which the possibility of comparison and criticizing them have been provided. The main claim of this essay which is itself an admitted Freud’s idea involved in an equivalence between two projects. It means that it is possible to establish a one-to-one equivalence between the foundational concepts and general mechanisms of moral institution. The place of this principle have not been determined in Freud’s thought; if it is a result of his discussion in that he presented separate arguments, or concerns with that as n axiom. Next, it is explained that this equivalence could be reduced into an equivalence between their two central concepts; The notion of moral judgment in its Aristotelian-Kantian sense, and the notion of Taboo in which anthropologists are concerned with. At the end, the similar and distinct aspects of these two concepts are discussed by which some critical considerations on Freud’s attitude toward moral institution have beed presented.
https://philosophy.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_127_964da7d576410791374217cb5aec92be.pdf
2012-08-22
97
116
Freud
moral sense
Super- ego
Genealogy of Morality
Moral judgment
Taboo
Heidari
Ahmad Ali
aah1342@yahoo.de
1
استادیار دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی
LEAD_AUTHOR
Mehdi
Hatef
2
کارشناسی ارشد دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی
AUTHOR
Freud, Sigmund. (1981). The standard edition of the complete psychological works
1
of Sigmund freud. Translated by James Strachey. London: Hograth Press; New
2
York: Norton
3
افلاطون. ( 1367 )، دوره آثار افلاطون، جلد دوم. ترجمه محمد حسن لطفی. تهران:
4
خوارزمی.
5
1386 )، حکمت و ) .« شاخه زرین فریزر و ملاحظات ویتگنشتاین بر آن » . - زندیه، عطیه
6
.44- فلسفه. سال سوم. شماره چهارم. 23
7
ترجمه حسین پاینده . در پل ریکور ... [و .« خود و نهاد » ،( - فروید، زیگموند . ( 1383 آ
8
دیگران] مبانی نظری مدرنیسم: (مجموعه مقالات) ترجمه هاله لاجوردی ... [و دیگران].
9
253-229 ) ، تهران: وزارت فرهنگ و ارشاد اسلامی؛ سازمان چاپ و انتشارات. )
10
ترجمۀ یوسف اباذری . در زیگموند فروید . .« ورای اصل لذت » ،( 1383 ب ) ----- -
11
83 ) ترجمۀ حسین پاینده ... [و دیگران ]. تهران : - روانکاوی( 1): (مجموعه مقالات)( 25
12
وزارت فرهنگ و ارشاد اسلامی؛ سازمان چاپ و انتشارات.
13
ترجم ۀ حسین پاینده . در زیگموند .« پیش درآمدی بر خودشیفتگی » ،( 1383 ج ) ----- -
14
185 ) ترجمۀ حسین پاینده ... [و - فروید. روانکاوی ( 1): (مجموعه مقالات )( 153
15
دیگران]. تهران: وزارت فرهنگ و ارشاد اسلامی؛ سازمان چاپ و انتشارات.
16
:( ترجمۀ مهسا کرم پور. در زیگموند فروید. روانکاوی ( 1 .« تحقق آرزو » ،( 1383 د ) .----- -
17
201 ) ترجم ۀ حسین پاینده ... [و دیگران ]. تهران : وزارت - (مجموعه مقالات )( 185
18
فرهنگ و ارشاد اسلامی؛ سازمان چاپ و انتشارات.
19
ترجم ۀ حسین پاینده . در زیگموند فروید . .« رئوس نظریه روانکاوی » ،( 1383 ه ) ----- -
20
75 ) ترجمۀ حسین پاینده ... [و دیگران ]. تهران : - روانکاوی( 2): (مجموعه مقالات)( 1
21
وزارت فرهنگ و ارشاد اسلامی؛ سازمان چاپ و انتشارات.
22
هم ارزی تکامل نهاد اخلاق در فرد و نوع با رجوع به اندیشه فروید 117
23
1389 )، تمدن و ملالتهای آ . ن ترجمۀ محمد مبشری. تهران: نشرماهی. ) ---- -
24
- فریزر، جیمز جرج. ( 1383 )، شاخه زرین، ترجمه کاظم فیروزمند، تهران: نشر آگاه.
25
- فوکویاما، فرانسیس. ( 1390 )، آینده فراانسانی م.ا ترجمۀ ترانه قطب. تهران: طرح نو.
26
- کانت، ایمانوئل. ( 1389 )، نقد عقل عملی، ترجمۀ انشاءالله رحمتی، تهران: نورالثقلین.
27
- مارکوزه، هربرت. ( 1389 )، اروس و تمدن. ترجمۀ امیرهوشنگ افتخاری راد. تهران: نشر چشمه.
28
- نیچه، فردریش. ( 1388 )، تبارشناسی اخلا . ق ترجمۀ داریوش آشوری. تهران: آگاه.
29
- Darwin, Charles.(1871). The descent of man and selection in relation t sex. 2
30
vols. London: Jon Murray.
31
- Freud, Sigmund (1900). Interpretation of dreams. Standard Edition. P 507-1048
32
- -------(1912-1913). Totem and Taboo. Standard Edition. P 2646-2799
33
- -------(1914). On the histoty of the psycho-analytic movement. Standard
34
Edition. p 2875-2925
35
- -------(1916-1917). Introductory lectures on psycho-analytics. Standard
36
Edition. P 3124-3501
37
- -------(1921). Group psychology and the analysis of the ego. Standard Edition.
38
P 3763-3834
39
- -------(1925). An Auotobiographical study. Standard Edition. P 4183-4245
40
- -------(1916). Some character types met with in psycho-analytic work.
41
Standard Edition. P 3098-3119
42
- -------(1923). The Ego and the Id. Standard Edition. P 3944-3992
43
- ------(1933). New introductory lectures on psycho-analysis. Standard Edition
44
p 4617-4778
45
- Focault, Michael (1991) . Questions of method. In Burchell, Gordon and Miler
46
(eds) the Focault effect. Chicago: The University of Chicago press.
47
- Lear, Jonathan. (2005). Freud. New York: Routledge.
48
- Ricoeur, Paul. (1970). Freud and Philosophy: An Essay on Interpretation.
49
Trans, Denis Savage. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
50
- Sulloway, Frank J. (1979). Freud, biologist of the mind: beyond the
51
psychoanalytic legend. New York: Harvard University Press.
52
- Wittgenstein, Ludwig. (1995). Remarks on Frazer’s Golden Bough. Ed. By
53
Rush Rhess. Trns. A.C. Miles. Doncaster: The Brynmill Press LTD
54
ORIGINAL_ARTICLE
The Role of Perception in Objectivity of Objects in View of Husserl’s Philosophy
Objectivity is one of the most basic and difficult issues in modern and contemporary philosophy. The present paper is devoted to this issue from view- point of Husserl’s transcendental phenomenology. Since perception, particularly sense perception, in view of intentionality, as lowest level of objectivity can act as the base for perceiving the objectivity of other objects, whether real or unreal (ideal), it has been discussed in this paper. To do this, objectivity of the sense perception and its role in leading the mind toward essential and ideal objects, and conversely, the role of latter objects in objectivity of the perception itself will be explored. Because the concepts of objectivity and evidence are correlate in Husserl’s philosophy, and since evidence as the self-given manifests itself, from the very beginning, in the lowest level, namely the objects of sense perception, and considering that evidence and objectivity of sense perception concern this lowest level, the critical viewpoint of Husserl’s phenomenology provides a firm and new basis for objectivity if taken at its full competence.
https://philosophy.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_128_0b2861e9e24a1ccc6d83d2e30b8496bf.pdf
2012-08-22
119
137
objectivity
evidence
intentionality
perception
transcendental phenomenology
Mahmoud
Sufiani
m.sufiani@yahoo.com
1
دانشجوی دکتری فلسفه جدید و معاصر دانشگاه شهید بهشتی
LEAD_AUTHOR
Ahmad Ali
Akbar Mesgari
2
استادیار گروه فلسفه دانشگاه شهید بهشتی
AUTHOR
D’Agostino, Fred, "Transcendence and Conversation: Two conceptions of
1
objectivity", American Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. 30, Number 2, April, 1993.
2
- Hermberg, Kevin,(2006), Husserl’s Phenomenology, London, Continuum.
3
- Husserl, Edmund, (1970), Logical Investigations, Trans. By J.N. Findlay. (from
4
second edition), Vol. 1 and Vol. 2, New York, Routledge and Kegan Paul.
5
- --------------------, (1983), Ideas I, Trans by F. Kersten, Netherlands, Martinus
6
Nijhoff Publishers.
7
- --------------------, (1989) , Ideas II, Trans. by Richard Rojcewicz and Andre
8
Schuwer, Netherlands, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
9
- --------------------, (1980), Ideas III, Trans. by Ted E. Klein and William E. Pohl,
10
Netherlands, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
11
- --------------------, (1969), Formal and Transcendental Logic, Trans. by Dorian
12
Cairns, Netherlands, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
13
- Logerlund, Henrik (ed.), (2007), Representation and Objects of Thought in
14
Medieval Philosophy , England, Ashgate.
15
- Sokolowski, Robert, (1974) ,Husserlian Meditations, Northwestern University
16
- Willard, Dallas, (1984), Logic and Objectivity of Knowledge, Ohio University
17
- بوخنسکی، ا.م. ( 1379 )، فلسفه معاصر اروپائی، ترجمۀ شرفالدین خراسانی، تهران،
18
انتشارات علمی و فرهنگی.
19
- رشیدیان، عبدالکریم. ( 1384 )، هوسرل در متن آثارش، چاپ اول، تهران، نشر نی.
20
ترجمۀ عبدالکریم رشیدیان، ،« ادموند هوسرل: فیلسوف وظایف ناتمام » . - ناتانسون، موریس
21
. پژوهشنامه علوم انسانی دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، 10 و 1371،11
22
- هگل، گئورگ ویلهلم. ( 1391 )، دانش منطق، ترجمۀ ابراهیم ملک اسماعیلی، چاپ اول،
23
تهران، انتشارات نگاه.
24
- هوسرل، ادموند، ( 1372 )، ایده پدیده شناسی، ترجمۀ عبدالکریم رشیدیان، چاپ اول،
25
تهران، انتشارات علمی و فرهنگی.
26
- هوسرل، ادموند. ( 1389 )، فلسفه به مثابه علم متقن، ترجمۀ بهنام آقایی و سیاوش
27
مسلمی، چاپ اول، تهران، نشر مرکز.
28
ORIGINAL_ARTICLE
Empiricism and the Challenge of Analytics
Although in the last decades positivistic view about analytic-synthetic distinction has encountered serious challenges, but the main results of this distinction such as antirealism in the mathematic an logic and the distinction of value-fact has been remained in the contemporary philosophy of science. this article at first will consider the main problems of empiricists in accounting the epistemic place of analytics and then will argue that Quinean approach is success in showing the problems of positivism but has embraced the conventionalism in physic which is in contrast with any serious scientific research. Reexamining the aristotlian realism in the logic and mathematic is the final position of this article.
https://philosophy.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_129_0deaa032fb93a18ad1278f1532bed455.pdf
2012-08-22
139
158
analytic
positivism
selfidentity
conventionalism
Realism
Reza
Sadeghi
rezasadeqi@gmail.com
1
استادیار گروه فلسفه دانشگاه اصفهان
LEAD_AUTHOR
Hume, David. 1739- 40. A Treatise of Human Nature, ed. L. A. Selby- Bigge
1
(oxford: Oxford University Press, 1888).
2
Hume, David. 1748. An Inquiry Concerning Human Understanding, ed. Charles W.
3
Hendel (Indianapolis: Bobbs – Merrill, 1955).
4
Ladyman james, 2002, understanding philosophy of science, Routledge london
5
Quine W. V., 1961"Two Dogmas of Empiricism", in. From a Logical Point of
6
View,. (Cambridge, Mass Harvard University Press) pp.20-46.
7
- ارسطو. ( 1377 )، متافیزیک، ترجمۀ شرفالدین خراسانی، تهران، انتشارات حکمت.
8
- اعتماد، شاپور. ( 1375 ) ، دیدگاهها و برهانها، نشر مرکز، تهران.
9
- بونجور، لورنس. ( 1389 )، دفاع از خرد ناب، ترجمۀ رضا صادقی، انتشارات علمی و فرهنگی،
10
تهران.
11
پاتنم هیلری. ( 1385 )، دوگانگی واقعیت/ ارزش، ترجمۀ فریدون فاطمی، نشر مرکز، تهران.
12
پوپر، کارل. ( 1368 )، حدسها و ابطاله:ا رشد شناخت علمی، ترجمۀ احمد آرام، شرکت سهامی
13
انتشار، تهران.
14
پوپر، کارل. ( 1374 )، شناخت عینی: برداشتی تکاملی، ترجمۀ احمد آرام، اندیشه های عصر نو،
15
تهران.
16
- دیویس، فیلیپ. ( 1375 )، وقتی ریاضیات نه می گوید ، چاپ در اعتماد 1375 ، صص . 271
17
کارنپ، رودلف. ( 1373 )، مقدمه ای بر فلسفۀ علم، ترجمۀ یوسف عفیفی، نشر نیلوفر تهران.
18
270- لاکاتوش، ایمره. ( 1375 )، اثبات ریاضی چیست؟، چاپ در اعتماد 1375 ، صص. 257
19
لایب نیتز، گوتفرید. ( 1372 ) ، مونادولوژی و چند مقاله فلسفی دیگر، ترجمه دکتر عبدالکریم
20
رشیدیان، انتشارات و آموزش انقلاب اسلامی، تهران.
21
315- هرش، موریس. ( 1375 )، واقعگرایی در ریاضیات، صص. 294
22
188- همپل کارل، الف. ( 1375 )، ماهیت راستی ریاضی، چاپ در اعتماد 1375 ، صص 211
23
230- همپل، کارل، ب. ( 1375 )، هندسه و علم تجربی، چاپ در اعتماد، 1375 ، صص 212
24
ORIGINAL_ARTICLE
Heidegger’s Deconstructive Interpretation of Plato
In the Light of
Platons Lehre Von der Wahrheit
Heidegger’s interpretation of Plato related to turning (Kehre) period of his thought. In the Platons Lehre Von der Wahrheit (which pertains to this period), by interpreting Plato’s Allegory of Cave and through deconstruction of Plato’s metaphysical tradition, he proceeds to present his own view of truth. While in Being and Time (Which pertains to first period of his thought) he had asserted that Correspondence and Openness as two senses of truth are alongside and in a sense the first is the condition of the realization of the latter, in the Platons Lehre Von der Wahrheit he has contrasted them and given value to Openness instead of Correspondence. Heidegger believes that although Pre-Socratic philosophers have been taking Being as Aletheia, it was Plato’s Allegory of the Cave that has opened the way to change the essence of truth and replaced truth as openness by truth as correspondence. Hence, taking Plato’s movement as the beginning of metaphysics and also by deconstructive interpretation of Plato’s Allegory of Cave, he proceeds to interpret the history of metaphysics. Therefore, the problem, on Heidegger’s view, is that history of metaphysics (even humanism and contemporary philosophies) was in the service of Plato’s movement. In conclusion, our main task, here, is to contemplate on beginning and understand Pre-Socratic philosopher’s view of Being.
https://philosophy.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_130_45bc508677ce4c6eaceee4fc6ae27155.pdf
2012-08-22
159
180
Aletheia
truth
metaphysics
Plato
tradition
Kehre
Correspondence
Allegory of the Cave
Ali Asghar
Mosleh
1
دانشیار فلسفه دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی
LEAD_AUTHOR
Reza
Dehghani
2
دانش آموخته کارشناسی ارشد دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی
AUTHOR
1382 )، هایدگر و تاریخ هستی. تهران: نشر مرکز. ). -- -- -- -
1
- افلاطون. ( 1380 )، "سوفسطایی" در دوره آثار افلاطون . ترجم ۀ محمد حسن لطفی .
2
تهران: انتشارات خوارزمی.
3
- جمادی، سیاوش .( 1385 )، زمینه و زمانه پدیدارشناسی، جستاری در زندگی و
4
اندیشه های هوسرل و هایدگر. تهران. ققنوس.
5
- کریچلی، سایمون. ( 1387 )، فلسفه قاره ای. ترجمۀ خشایار دیهیمی. تهران: نشر ماهی.
6
- هایدگر، مارتین .( 1385 )، متافیزیک چیست؟. ترجمۀ سیاوش جمادی. تهران: ققنوس.
7
1385 )، "نامه دربارة انسان گرایی" در لارنس کهون (گرد آورنده ). متن هایی ) . - - - - - - -
8
281 ). تهران: نشر نی. – برگزیده از مدرنیسم تا پست مدرنیس . م ترجمۀ عبدالکریم رشیدیان. ( 318
9
منابع لاتین
10
- Clark, Timoty. (2002). Martin Heidegger. London: Routledge.
11
- Dostal, Robert.j. (1992). "Beyond being: Heidegger's plato" in Christopher
12
Macann(ed). Martin Heidegger, critical Assessments.(vol.II). London: Routledge.
13
- Friedländer, paul. (1969). Plato: An Introduction. Translated by H Meyerhoff.
14
Princeton university press.
15
- Guignon. Charles. B. (2006)."Introduction" in Charles. B Guignon (ed). The
16
Cambridge companion to Heidegger. (1-41). New York: cambridge university
17
- Heidegger, Martin. (1954). Platons Lehre Von der Wahrheit. Switzerland:
18
Francke vellage Bern.
19
- -- -- -- .(1968). What is called Thinking?. translated by F.D.Wieck and
20
J.G.Gray. New York: Harper& Row.
21
- -- -- -- .(1993a). "Letter on Humanism " in David Farrell Krell(ed). Martin
22
Heidegger Basic Writings. (213 – 266). London: Routledge
23
- -- -- -- .(1994). The Fundamental concepts of Metaphysics, World, Finiude,
24
Solitude. Translated by William McNeill and Nicholas Walker. Bloomington:
25
Indiana University Press.
26
- -- -- -- .(1996). Being and Time. Translated by. Joan stambaugh. New York:
27
State university of New York press.
28
- Heidegger, Martin .(1998). "Plato's Doctrine of Truth" in William McNeill(ed).
29
Martin Heidegger Pathmarks. (155 – 182). Translated by. Thomas Sheehan . New
30
York: Cambridge university press.
31
- Inwood, Micheal .(2000). A Heidegger Dictionary. Oxford:Blackwell.
32
180 نشریۀ پژوهشهای فلسفی دانشگاه تبریز، سال 6، بهار و تابستان 91 ، شماره مسلسل 10
33
- Naess. Arne. (1969). Four Moder philosophers, carnap, Wittgenstein,
34
Heidegger, satre. Translated by Alastair Hannay. Chicago and London: The
35
university of Chicago press.
36
- Sheehan, Thomas, "Martin Heidegger" in Edward craige. Routledg
37
Encyclopedia of philosophy. London and NewYork: Routledge.
38
- Smart, Ninian. (2001). World philosophies. London and New York: Routledge.
39
- Volpi, Franco .(1996). "Dasein as praxis: the Heideggerian assimilation and
40
radicalization of the practical philosophy of Aristotle" in Christopher Macann(ed).
41
Critical Heidegger. (27 – 66). London and NewYork: Routledge.
42
- -- -- -- .(2006). "Heidegger, Buddhism , and deep ecology" in Charles
43
B.Guignon(ed). The Cambridge companion to a Heidegger (293- 325). New York:
44
Cambridge university press.
45