<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tabriz</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Philosophical Investigations</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2251-7960</Issn>
				<Volume>16</Volume>
				<Issue>41</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2022</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>A Critical Study of Two Conceptions of Wittgenstein’s “Family Resemblance”

.</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>A Critical Study of Two Conceptions of Wittgenstein’s “Family Resemblance”

.</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>222</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>241</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">14130</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22034/jpiut.2022.48418.3014</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mahdi</FirstName>
					<LastName>Mohammadi</LastName>
<Affiliation>PhD Candidate of Philosophy, Shahid Beheshti University. Tehran, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Asghar</FirstName>
					<LastName>Vaezie</LastName>
<Affiliation>Associate Professor of Philosophy Department, Shahid Beheshti University. Tehran, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2021</Year>
					<Month>10</Month>
					<Day>13</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>In the &lt;em&gt;Blue Book&lt;/em&gt; (pp. 17-18) and in the &lt;em&gt;Philosophical Investigation&lt;/em&gt; (§§ 66-67), Wittgenstein offers the idea of ‘family resemblances’ to explain the relation between some ‘things’. This paper first explores two accounts of this idea, one by Renford Bambrough and the other by Ilham Dilman. This reveals that there are at least two different accounts of ‘family resemblances’. Secondly, the paper sets out a critical assessment of both accounts so as to suggest that they both fail at what they claim to do.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">In the &lt;em&gt;Blue Book&lt;/em&gt; (pp. 17-18) and in the &lt;em&gt;Philosophical Investigation&lt;/em&gt; (§§ 66-67), Wittgenstein offers the idea of ‘family resemblances’ to explain the relation between some ‘things’. This paper first explores two accounts of this idea, one by Renford Bambrough and the other by Ilham Dilman. This reveals that there are at least two different accounts of ‘family resemblances’. Secondly, the paper sets out a critical assessment of both accounts so as to suggest that they both fail at what they claim to do.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Wittgenstein</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">family resemblance</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Ilham Dilman</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Renford Bambrough</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://philosophy.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_14130_aa971224fd8e8ff911a409b01221864a.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
