<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>دانشگاه تبریز</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>مجله پژوهش های فلسفی</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2251-7960</Issn>
				<Volume>16</Volume>
				<Issue>41</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2022</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Farabi’s Perspective on Global Peace</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Farabi’s Perspective on Global Peace</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>302</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>309</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">15795</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22034/jpiut.2022.52000.3243</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>نادیا</FirstName>
					<LastName>مفتونی</LastName>
<Affiliation>دانشیار گروه فلسفه و کلام اسلامی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>سید محمدرضا</FirstName>
					<LastName>آذرکسب</LastName>
<Affiliation>دانشجوی دکتری فلسفه و کلام اسلامی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2022</Year>
					<Month>06</Month>
					<Day>08</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Does it sound plausible to obtain a strategy for global peace in Farabi’s political philosophy? Put another way, could we procure a common language leading to peace among all cultures and religions, according to Farabi? Farabi’s utopia (al-madīnat al-fāḍila), literally meaning ‘the excellent state’, consists of five levels. On the first level stands the philosopher (fīlsūf) or the prophet (nabī). The second level includes poets (shuʿarā), music composers (mulaḥḥinūn), writers (kuttāb) and the likes. Farabi strongly believes in the power of imagination (khīyāl) and that most people are under the influence of their imaginative faculty (al-quwwat al-mutakhayyila). This faculty has an important outcome which influences his view on religion (milla), prophet, and their relation with the public (jumhūr): imagination, in his view, is the most powerful tool of influencing the public. Regarding this principle, it could be concluded that there is a shared function between the poet and the prophet. Farabian theory of peace may well be identified, based on the shared function between the poet and the prophet. In other words, for Farabi rational truth and rational happiness is fixed and one, having only one denotation, while its connotations, that is, sensory images and imagery forms are more than one—possibly many more. That being the case, various and sundry cultures and religions might well have different ways to pursue the same knowledge, truth, and contentment.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">Does it sound plausible to obtain a strategy for global peace in Farabi’s political philosophy? Put another way, could we procure a common language leading to peace among all cultures and religions, according to Farabi? Farabi’s utopia (al-madīnat al-fāḍila), literally meaning ‘the excellent state’, consists of five levels. On the first level stands the philosopher (fīlsūf) or the prophet (nabī). The second level includes poets (shuʿarā), music composers (mulaḥḥinūn), writers (kuttāb) and the likes. Farabi strongly believes in the power of imagination (khīyāl) and that most people are under the influence of their imaginative faculty (al-quwwat al-mutakhayyila). This faculty has an important outcome which influences his view on religion (milla), prophet, and their relation with the public (jumhūr): imagination, in his view, is the most powerful tool of influencing the public. Regarding this principle, it could be concluded that there is a shared function between the poet and the prophet. Farabian theory of peace may well be identified, based on the shared function between the poet and the prophet. In other words, for Farabi rational truth and rational happiness is fixed and one, having only one denotation, while its connotations, that is, sensory images and imagery forms are more than one—possibly many more. That being the case, various and sundry cultures and religions might well have different ways to pursue the same knowledge, truth, and contentment.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Farabi</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">culture</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Global Peace</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">imagination</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">utopia</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://philosophy.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_15795_4ba498d0aab3e417df84e529e72ff3d4.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
