<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tabriz</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Philosophical Investigations</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2251-7960</Issn>
				<Volume>11</Volume>
				<Issue>21</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2017</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>The Relationship between Two Secular and Theological Interpretations of the Concept of Highest Good in Kant: with respect to the criticism of Andrews Reath’s paper  “Two Conceptions of the Highest Good in Kant”</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>The Relationship between Two Secular and Theological Interpretations of the Concept of Highest Good in Kant: with respect to the criticism of Andrews Reath’s paper  “Two Conceptions of the Highest Good in Kant”</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>93</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>107</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">16151</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Reza</FirstName>
					<LastName>Mahouzi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Associate professor, Institute of Social and Cultural Studies (ISCS), Tehran, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Zohreh</FirstName>
					<LastName>Saidi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant Professor of Philosophy, Institute of Culture, Art and Communication, Tehran, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2017</Year>
					<Month>02</Month>
					<Day>21</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>&lt;em&gt;Discussing two common critiques on theological interpretations of the concept of the highest good in Kant’s moral philosophy in his paper, Two Conceptions of the Highest Good in Kant, Reath has invited readers to have a secular interpretation of this concept and pointed out its advantages. In the present paper, we will attempt to provide the main principles of Reath’s claims and demonstrate why Kant has stated both of these interpretations in all of his critical works—a subject that has confused Reath. For this purpose, we will indicate that in both of the above interpretations, Kant has offered the concept of the highest good in a historical context, in which the intellectual idea of the highest good as a desired ultimate totality makes the intellect to grow in history and cultivate the talents of human kind through numerous conflicts embedded in nature.&lt;/em&gt;</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">&lt;em&gt;Discussing two common critiques on theological interpretations of the concept of the highest good in Kant’s moral philosophy in his paper, Two Conceptions of the Highest Good in Kant, Reath has invited readers to have a secular interpretation of this concept and pointed out its advantages. In the present paper, we will attempt to provide the main principles of Reath’s claims and demonstrate why Kant has stated both of these interpretations in all of his critical works—a subject that has confused Reath. For this purpose, we will indicate that in both of the above interpretations, Kant has offered the concept of the highest good in a historical context, in which the intellectual idea of the highest good as a desired ultimate totality makes the intellect to grow in history and cultivate the talents of human kind through numerous conflicts embedded in nature.&lt;/em&gt;</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">History</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">nature</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Highest good</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Happiness</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">virtue</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">conflict</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://philosophy.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_16151_41812fa8ac7b2c6cedf8aca4a8289c52.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
