<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>دانشگاه تبریز</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>مجله پژوهش های فلسفی</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2251-7960</Issn>
				<Volume>19</Volume>
				<Issue>51</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2025</Year>
					<Month>06</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>A Disruptive Ontology of Caring Time: overcoming moral harm in care through an emancipatory ethics of time</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>A Disruptive Ontology of Caring Time: overcoming moral harm in care through an emancipatory ethics of time</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>137</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>162</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">19823</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22034/jpiut.2025.67230.4098</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Amrita</FirstName>
					<LastName>Banerjee</LastName>
<Affiliation>Associate Professor at Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, India</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2025</Year>
					<Month>05</Month>
					<Day>09</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Care ethics emphasizes the incessant nature of the work of care. The other-oriented focus of care work and the asymmetric relation between the one-caring and the cared-for entails a normative commitment to a cyclical conception of living time on the part of the one-caring. Moreover, in care, we must think of the time of the self as intertwined with the time of the other, thus constituting a mutual temporality. However, from the perspective of a feminist phenomenology of time, potential moral harms can be identified in the temporal structure of care, which may cause caring time to degenerate into uncaring time for the one-caring. To avoid such a predicament, it is imperative to develop an emancipatory ethics of time at the heart of the relational ontology of care. I argue that when various modalities of living time in care sediment into a coherentist ontology of time, only then is there a degradation into uncaring time. To positively reconstruct a radical notion of caring time, we must build a disruptive ontology within our conception of caring time, which highlights the significance of rupture, dissonance, disruption, and distortion within the everydayness of care. The argument in the paper serves a normative purpose since it draws our attention to what we owe morally to the one-caring in terms of their time. My analysis weaves together care ethics, feminist phenomenology and feminist writing from India through a philosophical engagement with Amar Jiban by Rassundari Devi.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">Care ethics emphasizes the incessant nature of the work of care. The other-oriented focus of care work and the asymmetric relation between the one-caring and the cared-for entails a normative commitment to a cyclical conception of living time on the part of the one-caring. Moreover, in care, we must think of the time of the self as intertwined with the time of the other, thus constituting a mutual temporality. However, from the perspective of a feminist phenomenology of time, potential moral harms can be identified in the temporal structure of care, which may cause caring time to degenerate into uncaring time for the one-caring. To avoid such a predicament, it is imperative to develop an emancipatory ethics of time at the heart of the relational ontology of care. I argue that when various modalities of living time in care sediment into a coherentist ontology of time, only then is there a degradation into uncaring time. To positively reconstruct a radical notion of caring time, we must build a disruptive ontology within our conception of caring time, which highlights the significance of rupture, dissonance, disruption, and distortion within the everydayness of care. The argument in the paper serves a normative purpose since it draws our attention to what we owe morally to the one-caring in terms of their time. My analysis weaves together care ethics, feminist phenomenology and feminist writing from India through a philosophical engagement with Amar Jiban by Rassundari Devi.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">care ethics</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Feminist phenomenology of time</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Feminist philosophy in India</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Rassundari Devi</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">uncaring time</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">emancipatory ethics of time</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">disruptive ontology of time</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://philosophy.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_19823_bb621d38a1eab740b355c46fa9af2603.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
