<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tabriz</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Philosophical Investigations</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2251-7960</Issn>
				<Volume>19</Volume>
				<Issue>52</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2025</Year>
					<Month>11</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Rethinking the Role of the Teacher: From Architect of Education to Realistic Collaboration with Artificial Intelligence</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Rethinking the Role of the Teacher: From Architect of Education to Realistic Collaboration with Artificial Intelligence</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>301</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>320</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">20178</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22034/jpiut.2025.67502.4119</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Saeid</FirstName>
					<LastName>Zarghami-Hamrah</LastName>
<Affiliation>Associate Professor, Department of Philosophy of Education, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran.</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Hamid</FirstName>
					<LastName>Ahmadi-Hedayat</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Farhangian University, Tehran, Iran</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0003-0814-5696</Identifier>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2025</Year>
					<Month>05</Month>
					<Day>25</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>The purpose of this study is to re-examine the role of the teacher, tracing its evolution from an &quot;architect of instruction&quot; to a &quot;realistic collaborator&quot; with AI. To achieve this objective, the research employs a philosophical approach and a qualitative meta-analysis methodology. The findings indicate that generative AI—with its capacity to synthesize vast data, generate content, and deliver personalized, interactive curricula—fundamentally transforms the teacher&#039;s conventional authority. Drawing on relevant evidence, this paper frames this transformation in terms of three distinct crises: 1) a crisis in the teacher&#039;s role as the custodian of knowledge representation, 2) a crisis in curriculum architecture, and 3) a crisis in the facilitation of learning. These transformations simultaneously present new horizons for enhancing educational quality while also threatening to destabilize the teacher&#039;s position in the educational landscape. The second part of the paper critiques the &quot;technical facilitator&quot; model of teaching and proposes arguments for restoring the teacher&#039;s diminished professional legitimacy. In conclusion, it is argued that today&#039;s educators, freed from former technical duties like lesson planning and knowledge representation through their collaboration with generative AI, can now focus on cultivating learners&#039; skills in self-awareness, self-actualization, and social-emotional development. Furthermore, a new role for the teacher emerges as a &quot;critical coach,&quot; tasked with evaluating the biased outputs of AI.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">The purpose of this study is to re-examine the role of the teacher, tracing its evolution from an &quot;architect of instruction&quot; to a &quot;realistic collaborator&quot; with AI. To achieve this objective, the research employs a philosophical approach and a qualitative meta-analysis methodology. The findings indicate that generative AI—with its capacity to synthesize vast data, generate content, and deliver personalized, interactive curricula—fundamentally transforms the teacher&#039;s conventional authority. Drawing on relevant evidence, this paper frames this transformation in terms of three distinct crises: 1) a crisis in the teacher&#039;s role as the custodian of knowledge representation, 2) a crisis in curriculum architecture, and 3) a crisis in the facilitation of learning. These transformations simultaneously present new horizons for enhancing educational quality while also threatening to destabilize the teacher&#039;s position in the educational landscape. The second part of the paper critiques the &quot;technical facilitator&quot; model of teaching and proposes arguments for restoring the teacher&#039;s diminished professional legitimacy. In conclusion, it is argued that today&#039;s educators, freed from former technical duties like lesson planning and knowledge representation through their collaboration with generative AI, can now focus on cultivating learners&#039; skills in self-awareness, self-actualization, and social-emotional development. Furthermore, a new role for the teacher emerges as a &quot;critical coach,&quot; tasked with evaluating the biased outputs of AI.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Generative artificial intelligence</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">educational architecture</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">teacher’s role</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://philosophy.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_20178_e1d49c200b576c386c832405e415131a.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
