University of Tabriz Journal of Philosophical Investigations 2251-7960 20 55 2026 06 22 The Simple yet Elusive: The Intertwinement of Ideology and Law in the Trajectory of Philosophical Thought (From Habermas to Foucault and Rancière) The Simple yet Elusive: The Intertwinement of Ideology and Law in the Trajectory of Philosophical Thought (From Habermas to Foucault and Rancière) 687 704 21621 10.22034/jpiut.2026.70993.4397 FA Navid Zamaneh Ghadim Assistant Professor, Department of Law, Roshdiyeh Higher Education Institute, Tabriz, Iran Amin Hajivand Postdoctoral Researcher and Visiting Lecturer, Department of Criminal Law and Criminology, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran 0000-0002-3451-9631 Journal Article 2025 12 29 The aim of this research is to analyze the multilayered relationship between ideology and law in the evolution of contemporary philosophical thought; a relationship that has often been explained in a one-dimensional or reductionist manner in the literature on the philosophy of law, and its complexities have been neglected. Focusing on three central approaches—Habermas, Foucault, and Rancière—and considering their formative theoretical backgrounds in Althusser, Arendt, and Lefebvre, this article seeks to show why the fusion of ideology with law is both self-evident and elusive; something that is referred to as the “impossible simpleton.” Methodologically, the present research is based on a critical-conceptual analysis and genealogy of legal discourses, and uses the main texts of the three thinkers to extract normative, power-oriented, and conflictual patterns in understanding law. The research findings show that law is linked to ideology at three levels; The legitimizing discursive level in Habermas, the disciplinary-power level in Foucault, and the discursive-liberatory level in Rancière. These three levels are neither fused into a single theory nor reducible to each other; rather, they collectively provide a multilayered picture of the ideological functioning of law. The final conclusion of the article is that law is not simply an instrument of legitimacy, nor simply a mechanism of power, nor simply a field of emancipation, but a multilevel arena in which ideology is both produced and reproduced, and is also capable of interruption, critique, and resistance. This summary paves the way for more complex analyses in legal theory, particularly in the areas of legitimacy, human rights, and penal policies. The aim of this research is to analyze the multilayered relationship between ideology and law in the evolution of contemporary philosophical thought; a relationship that has often been explained in a one-dimensional or reductionist manner in the literature on the philosophy of law, and its complexities have been neglected. Focusing on three central approaches—Habermas, Foucault, and Rancière—and considering their formative theoretical backgrounds in Althusser, Arendt, and Lefebvre, this article seeks to show why the fusion of ideology with law is both self-evident and elusive; something that is referred to as the “impossible simpleton.” Methodologically, the present research is based on a critical-conceptual analysis and genealogy of legal discourses, and uses the main texts of the three thinkers to extract normative, power-oriented, and conflictual patterns in understanding law. The research findings show that law is linked to ideology at three levels; The legitimizing discursive level in Habermas, the disciplinary-power level in Foucault, and the discursive-liberatory level in Rancière. These three levels are neither fused into a single theory nor reducible to each other; rather, they collectively provide a multilayered picture of the ideological functioning of law. The final conclusion of the article is that law is not simply an instrument of legitimacy, nor simply a mechanism of power, nor simply a field of emancipation, but a multilevel arena in which ideology is both produced and reproduced, and is also capable of interruption, critique, and resistance. This summary paves the way for more complex analyses in legal theory, particularly in the areas of legitimacy, human rights, and penal policies. https://philosophy.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_21621_d5f375cb1b83784b57f931a45fc7bf66.pdf