<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tabriz</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Philosophical Investigations</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2251-7960</Issn>
				<Volume>3</Volume>
				<Issue>214</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2010</Year>
					<Month>02</Month>
					<Day>20</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>The Methodological Limitations of Popper's Research program on "Open Society"</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>The Methodological Limitations of Popper&#039;s Research program on &quot;Open Society&quot;</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>1</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>28</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">2823</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>ALIREZA</FirstName>
					<LastName>ISMAILZAD</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2014</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>10</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>K. R. Popper, because of his standpoints on philosophy and methodology of science and also his attitudes on political thought, has gained a dignity in history of ideas of the twentieth century. Popper&#039;s significant contribution to philosophy of science is mainly concerned with the critique of &quot;Inductionism&quot; and defense of &quot;Falsifiability &quot;; and his significant contribution to political science is rooted in his defense of &quot;Open Society&quot;. His emphasis is on &quot;critical rationalism&quot; in both methodology of science and political thought. Science and its method has been a great inspiration for his whole philosophy. But his perceptions on philosophy and methodology of science has been encountered some critics. If we accept that Popper&#039;s political philosophy has been created in his methodological frame work, then some of limitations of his methodology should be verified in order to reveal incompetences of his research program on &quot;Open Society&quot;.
This article claims that Popper&#039;s research program on his &quot;Open Society&quot; has been created in his methodological framework and suffers some defects and limitations. This article, with a critical view, illustrates some limitations of research program and dogmatisms of Popper&#039;s &quot;Open Society&quot;. It seems that Popper&#039;s research program on &quot;Open Society&quot; is vulnerable when it is judged by &quot;fundamental pluralism&quot; criterion- the epistemological foundation of open society.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">K. R. Popper, because of his standpoints on philosophy and methodology of science and also his attitudes on political thought, has gained a dignity in history of ideas of the twentieth century. Popper&#039;s significant contribution to philosophy of science is mainly concerned with the critique of &quot;Inductionism&quot; and defense of &quot;Falsifiability &quot;; and his significant contribution to political science is rooted in his defense of &quot;Open Society&quot;. His emphasis is on &quot;critical rationalism&quot; in both methodology of science and political thought. Science and its method has been a great inspiration for his whole philosophy. But his perceptions on philosophy and methodology of science has been encountered some critics. If we accept that Popper&#039;s political philosophy has been created in his methodological frame work, then some of limitations of his methodology should be verified in order to reveal incompetences of his research program on &quot;Open Society&quot;.
This article claims that Popper&#039;s research program on his &quot;Open Society&quot; has been created in his methodological framework and suffers some defects and limitations. This article, with a critical view, illustrates some limitations of research program and dogmatisms of Popper&#039;s &quot;Open Society&quot;. It seems that Popper&#039;s research program on &quot;Open Society&quot; is vulnerable when it is judged by &quot;fundamental pluralism&quot; criterion- the epistemological foundation of open society.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Open society. Popper. Critical rationalism. Philosophy of science. Methodology. Political thought</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://philosophy.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_2823_b7ab6c3cc33f82e2ed70c7c30580bba5.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
