<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tabriz</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Philosophical Investigations</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2251-7960</Issn>
				<Volume>3</Volume>
				<Issue>214</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2010</Year>
					<Month>02</Month>
					<Day>20</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Contingent Conditionals in Modern Logic</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Contingent Conditionals in Modern Logic</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>105</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>133</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">2828</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>ASADOLLAH</FirstName>
					<LastName>FALLAHI</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2014</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>10</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Contingent conditionals, at the comparative logical works, has yielded different, and often inconsistent, analyses. At contemporaries’ works, there are two approaches to the contingent conditionals: modal and truth-table methods. At the former, there has been used modal connectives of necessity and possibility to analyze the contingent conditionals; but at the latter, some truth-tables has been proposed. At the paper, besides presenting and criticizing the extant theories, we gain new analyses and formulations of the disputed subject matters.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">Contingent conditionals, at the comparative logical works, has yielded different, and often inconsistent, analyses. At contemporaries’ works, there are two approaches to the contingent conditionals: modal and truth-table methods. At the former, there has been used modal connectives of necessity and possibility to analyze the contingent conditionals; but at the latter, some truth-tables has been proposed. At the paper, besides presenting and criticizing the extant theories, we gain new analyses and formulations of the disputed subject matters.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">conditional</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">cogent</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Contingent</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Ancient Logic</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">modern logic</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Modal Logic</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Truth-tables</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://philosophy.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_2828_ff01fd4104b413ae954653feb30ef1e2.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
