<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tabriz</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Philosophical Investigations</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2251-7960</Issn>
				<Volume>3</Volume>
				<Issue>210</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2009</Year>
					<Month>08</Month>
					<Day>23</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>The Epistemological and Idealistic Aspects of Schopenhauer's philosophy</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>The Epistemological and Idealistic Aspects of Schopenhauer&#039;s philosophy</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>75</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>92</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">2894</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mohammad Javad</FirstName>
					<LastName>Safian</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Abdollah</FirstName>
					<LastName>Amini</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2014</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>17</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>As far as Schopenhauer’s philosophy sees the world as representation,&lt;br /&gt;and deals with the way of knowing and the relation between subject and&lt;br /&gt;object, it is consistent with the Kant’s philosophy and epistemology.&lt;br /&gt;Both Schopenhauer’s Dissertation and the first part of his famous work&lt;br /&gt;The Word as Will and Representation reflect the Kantian epistemology.&lt;br /&gt;Schopenhauer himself has admitted that his philosophy is based on the&lt;br /&gt;Kant’s philosophy. In epistemology. he accepts the Kant’s Copernician&lt;br /&gt;revolution. Even though the epistemology aspect of his philosophy (The&lt;br /&gt;world as representation) is based on the Kant’s philosophy, But he&lt;br /&gt;never likes thoroughly to follow Kant&#039;s philosophy. Uniting the&lt;br /&gt;causality with the matter, reducing the twelve categories of&lt;br /&gt;understanding to one category, considering time, space and causality as&lt;br /&gt;the forms of the principle of sufficient reason, etc. are his innovative&lt;br /&gt;cases versus Kantian view. Then it can be said that, he intended to go&lt;br /&gt;beyond the Kant’s philosophy. On the other hand, Schopenhauer’s&lt;br /&gt;philosophy is idealistic. He considers the object as the representation of&lt;br /&gt;the subject. But the idealistic aspect of his philosophy is considered only&lt;br /&gt;in the structure of the world as representation rather as will. In other&lt;br /&gt;words, idealism contains only the phenomenal aspect of the world.&lt;br /&gt;This paper tries to illustrate the epistemological and idealistic status&lt;br /&gt;of Schopenhauer’s philosophy from the perspective of Kant’s&lt;br /&gt;theoretical philosophy.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">As far as Schopenhauer’s philosophy sees the world as representation,&lt;br /&gt;and deals with the way of knowing and the relation between subject and&lt;br /&gt;object, it is consistent with the Kant’s philosophy and epistemology.&lt;br /&gt;Both Schopenhauer’s Dissertation and the first part of his famous work&lt;br /&gt;The Word as Will and Representation reflect the Kantian epistemology.&lt;br /&gt;Schopenhauer himself has admitted that his philosophy is based on the&lt;br /&gt;Kant’s philosophy. In epistemology. he accepts the Kant’s Copernician&lt;br /&gt;revolution. Even though the epistemology aspect of his philosophy (The&lt;br /&gt;world as representation) is based on the Kant’s philosophy, But he&lt;br /&gt;never likes thoroughly to follow Kant&#039;s philosophy. Uniting the&lt;br /&gt;causality with the matter, reducing the twelve categories of&lt;br /&gt;understanding to one category, considering time, space and causality as&lt;br /&gt;the forms of the principle of sufficient reason, etc. are his innovative&lt;br /&gt;cases versus Kantian view. Then it can be said that, he intended to go&lt;br /&gt;beyond the Kant’s philosophy. On the other hand, Schopenhauer’s&lt;br /&gt;philosophy is idealistic. He considers the object as the representation of&lt;br /&gt;the subject. But the idealistic aspect of his philosophy is considered only&lt;br /&gt;in the structure of the world as representation rather as will. In other&lt;br /&gt;words, idealism contains only the phenomenal aspect of the world.&lt;br /&gt;This paper tries to illustrate the epistemological and idealistic status&lt;br /&gt;of Schopenhauer’s philosophy from the perspective of Kant’s&lt;br /&gt;theoretical philosophy.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">The principle of sufficient reason</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Idealism</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">The world as representation</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">The world as will</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Epistemology</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Subject</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">object</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://philosophy.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_2894_a947acbf5db5c12f6fa9a0b739a73f3f.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
