<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tabriz</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Philosophical Investigations</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2251-7960</Issn>
				<Volume>2</Volume>
				<Issue>203</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2008</Year>
					<Month>08</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>The Method of Question and Answer as a Principle of Charity
in Gadamer’s Hermeneutics</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>The Method of Question and Answer as a Principle of Charity
in Gadamer’s Hermeneutics</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>1</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>14</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">2933</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>David</FirstName>
					<LastName>Vessey</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2014</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>28</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Principles of Charity have become central features of any plausible theory of interpretation. The trick has been to explain how the truth of the text to appear without abandoning one’s critical resources in the process. I argue that Gadamer’s discussion of “the logic of question and answer,” when applied to textual interpretation, functions as a principle of charity provides the right balance between being too liberal and being too critical.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">Principles of Charity have become central features of any plausible theory of interpretation. The trick has been to explain how the truth of the text to appear without abandoning one’s critical resources in the process. I argue that Gadamer’s discussion of “the logic of question and answer,” when applied to textual interpretation, functions as a principle of charity provides the right balance between being too liberal and being too critical.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Hans-Georg Gadamer</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Principle of charity</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">interpretation</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">rationality</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">David Vessey</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Donald Davidson</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://philosophy.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_2933_b8a72ff2367738f14542aa9da529611b.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
