<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tabriz</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Philosophical Investigations</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2251-7960</Issn>
				<Volume>4</Volume>
				<Issue>216</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2010</Year>
					<Month>06</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>A Study of the Problem of Evil in Leibniz’s Thought</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>A Study of the Problem of Evil in Leibniz’s Thought</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>105</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>129</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">364</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Ali</FirstName>
					<LastName>Fath Taheri</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2009</Year>
					<Month>09</Month>
					<Day>26</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Observing the flaws and defects in the world and the pains and sufferings that are drived from them, i.e., the existence of the evil in the world, have engaged the mind of everyone. People wish to know that what the origin of the evil is and how is it possible to reconcile them with a belief in a God, who is All-knowing, All-powerful, and Pure Good and His creation is the best possible creation. According to Hume, Leibniz by posing certain questions that since Epicure’s time have been asked and remained unanswered, tried to give a befitting reply. Accepting three kinds of evils, Leibniz tried to clarify them through different methods. In this paper, his responses have been classified in three parts and, then, have been treated. Though his responses are considered to be based on Saint Augustine’s view, the author, in this paper, proved that one of the responses and perhaps the deepest one is that of Leibniz’s himself and is based on his own metaphysics.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">Observing the flaws and defects in the world and the pains and sufferings that are drived from them, i.e., the existence of the evil in the world, have engaged the mind of everyone. People wish to know that what the origin of the evil is and how is it possible to reconcile them with a belief in a God, who is All-knowing, All-powerful, and Pure Good and His creation is the best possible creation. According to Hume, Leibniz by posing certain questions that since Epicure’s time have been asked and remained unanswered, tried to give a befitting reply. Accepting three kinds of evils, Leibniz tried to clarify them through different methods. In this paper, his responses have been classified in three parts and, then, have been treated. Though his responses are considered to be based on Saint Augustine’s view, the author, in this paper, proved that one of the responses and perhaps the deepest one is that of Leibniz’s himself and is based on his own metaphysics.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Metaphyscical Evil</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Physical Evil</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Moral Evil</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Possible</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Compossible</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://philosophy.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_364_f97ab52188e2aaa28573c480741c0053.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
