<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tabriz</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Philosophical Investigations</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2251-7960</Issn>
				<Volume>13</Volume>
				<Issue>26</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2019</Year>
					<Month>05</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>The Relationship between Morals and Aesthetics in Hume’s Philosophy</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>The Relationship between Morals and Aesthetics in Hume’s Philosophy</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>395</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>421</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">8465</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22034/jpiut.2019.8465</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Zolfagar</FirstName>
					<LastName>Hemmati</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant Professor, 3 Allameh Institute of Islamic &amp; Humanities sciences, University of Tabriz</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0002-6985-400X</Identifier>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Jalal</FirstName>
					<LastName>Peykani</LastName>
<Affiliation>Associate Professor, University of Payam-e noor</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mustafa</FirstName>
					<LastName>Shahraeini</LastName>
<Affiliation>Associate Professor of Philosophy Department, University of Tabriz</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mahmoud</FirstName>
					<LastName>Soufiani</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant Professor, University of Tabriz</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2018</Year>
					<Month>11</Month>
					<Day>17</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>During the history of philosophy, morals and beauty, and finding a diagnostic criterion for them, was a very important problem for philosophers. Most of the philosophers maintained that such criterion rooted in reason, but Hume presented a noble idea and said that moral sense based on feeling and sentiment. Everything which through its utility or beauty, leads to pleaser is virtuous. Sometimes directly and sometimes through the beauty and appearing beautiful, the utility leads to pleaser. Also, according to Hume, beauty is a subjective thing measured by the criterion of the pleaser. Thus, pleaser and pain are the criteria of taste and sentiment to the diagnosis of virtue and vice, as well as, the beauty and value of art. &lt;br /&gt;In this paper, after comparing and monitoring morals and beauty from four aspects, through brief surveying of certain commentators of Hume, we attempt to explain the relationship between beauty, utility, and pleaser. Finally, we assert that the beauty is very important components in Hume’s explain of Morals, but at the same time aesthetics has no superiority to morals; and thus, we defend the originality of morals to aesthetics.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">During the history of philosophy, morals and beauty, and finding a diagnostic criterion for them, was a very important problem for philosophers. Most of the philosophers maintained that such criterion rooted in reason, but Hume presented a noble idea and said that moral sense based on feeling and sentiment. Everything which through its utility or beauty, leads to pleaser is virtuous. Sometimes directly and sometimes through the beauty and appearing beautiful, the utility leads to pleaser. Also, according to Hume, beauty is a subjective thing measured by the criterion of the pleaser. Thus, pleaser and pain are the criteria of taste and sentiment to the diagnosis of virtue and vice, as well as, the beauty and value of art. &lt;br /&gt;In this paper, after comparing and monitoring morals and beauty from four aspects, through brief surveying of certain commentators of Hume, we attempt to explain the relationship between beauty, utility, and pleaser. Finally, we assert that the beauty is very important components in Hume’s explain of Morals, but at the same time aesthetics has no superiority to morals; and thus, we defend the originality of morals to aesthetics.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Hume</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Morals</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">aesthetics</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">taste</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">feeling</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://philosophy.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_8465_b978fa09eaf59366a0f14671e2464b44.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
