<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>دانشگاه تبریز</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>مجله پژوهش های فلسفی</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2251-7960</Issn>
				<Volume>13</Volume>
				<Issue>28</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2019</Year>
					<Month>10</Month>
					<Day>23</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>The Priority of literature to Philosophy in Richard Rorty</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>The Priority of literature to Philosophy in Richard Rorty</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>207</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>219</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">9512</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22034/jpiut.2019.36395.2437</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>محمد</FirstName>
					<LastName>اصغری</LastName>
<Affiliation>دانشیار گروه فلسفه، دانشگاه تبریز</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2019</Year>
					<Month>10</Month>
					<Day>25</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>In this article, I try to defend the thesis that imagination against reason, moral progress through imagination not the reason, the emergence of literary culture after philosophical culture from Hegel onwards, contingency of language, the usefulness of literature (poetry, novels and stories, etc.) in enhancing empathy with one another and ultimately reducing philosophy to poetry in Richard Rorty&#039;s writings point to one thing: the priority of literature to philosophy. The literary or post-physical culture that Rorty defends is opposed to the Enlightenment and the philosophical and religious culture. Rorty prefers literary culture among the religious culture and philosophical culture. The literary culture Rorty envisages is a radically historicist and nominalist one. Rorty’s romanticised version of pragmatism aims precisely at dealing with this literary or post-physical culture or, in generally, the literature.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">In this article, I try to defend the thesis that imagination against reason, moral progress through imagination not the reason, the emergence of literary culture after philosophical culture from Hegel onwards, contingency of language, the usefulness of literature (poetry, novels and stories, etc.) in enhancing empathy with one another and ultimately reducing philosophy to poetry in Richard Rorty&#039;s writings point to one thing: the priority of literature to philosophy. The literary or post-physical culture that Rorty defends is opposed to the Enlightenment and the philosophical and religious culture. Rorty prefers literary culture among the religious culture and philosophical culture. The literary culture Rorty envisages is a radically historicist and nominalist one. Rorty’s romanticised version of pragmatism aims precisely at dealing with this literary or post-physical culture or, in generally, the literature.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">philosophy</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">literary culture</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Literature</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">pragmatism</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">and Rorty</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://philosophy.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_9512_81daca9658940eda902cd281bd02ef85.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
