نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی- پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 استادیار گروه علوم سیاسی دانشگاه اصفهان، دانشکده علوم اداری و اقتصاد، دانشگاه اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران.
2 دانشیار جامعه‌شناسی پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی، تهران، ایران
چکیده
سخنی به گزاف نرفته است اگر گفته شود که مارتین هایدگر یکی از شاخص‌ترین متفکران قرن بیستم است که تاریخ 2500 ساله غرب را به مثابه تجلیگاه سوبژکتیویسم و عقلانیت تکنولوژیک به مهمیز نقد می‌کشد و وجهه همت خویش را بر این امر قرار می‌دهد که از پارادایم معرفت بنیاد عالم مدرن بگسلد و به هستی‌شناسی روی آورد. مفروض این مقاله بر این اصل استوار است که اگر سیاست مدرن بر پایه اراده معطوف به قدرت، شکاف میان سوژه و ابژه و سیطره عقلانیت تکنولوژیک پایه‌ریزی شده است؛ هایدگر قصد دارد با گسست از معرفت‌شناسی و روی آوردن به هستی‌شناسی، از سیاست مبتنی بر رابطه ارباب و بندگی عالم مدرن گذر کند و سیاست مبتنی بر هستی‌شناسی را که متضمن از میان برداشتن شکاف میان سوژه و ابژه و گشودگی انسان نسبت به خود، جهان و دیگری است مطرح کند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
The Relevance of Meditative Thinking and Politics in Heidegger’ Thinking
نویسندگان [English]
- Hossein Rouhani 1
- Seyed Javad Miri 2
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, Faculty of Administrative Sciences and Economics, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran
2 Associate Professor of Sociology, Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]
With no exaggeration, Martin Heidegger is one of the most prominent thinkers of the twentieth century, who critically examines the 2,500-year history of the West as a manifestation of subjectivism and technological rationality, and places his efforts on the foundation of the paradigm of knowledge. The modern world collapsed and turned to ontology. The premise of this paper is based on the principle that if modern politics is based on the will to power, the gap between subject and object, and the dominance of technological rationality, Heidegger intends to break away from politics by turning from epistemology to ontology. Based on the relationship between master and slavery of the modern world, and introduce a policy based on ontology, which ensures the elimination of the gap between subject and object and the openness of man to himself, the world and the other.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
- Subjectivism
- Politics
- Modernity
- Ontology
- Abdolkarimi, Bijan (2018) Questioning the possibility of religion in the contemporary world, Tehran: Naqd-e Farahang [In Persian]
- Abdolkarimi, Bijan (2008) We and the Nietzschean world, Tehran: Nashr-e Alam. [In Persian]
- Abdolkarimi, Bijan (2013) Heidegger in Iran, Tehran: Research Institute of Iranian Wisdom and Philosophy. [In Persian]
- Abdolkarimi, Bijan (2015) Heidegger on our historical horizon, Tehran: Naqd-e Farahang Publications. [In Persian]
- Abdolkarimi, Bijan (2020) What does Heidegger's philosophy lead to? Visit 12/15/99 at: https://www.mehrnews.com/news. [In Persian]
- Ahmadi, Babak (2001) Heidegger and the fundamental question, Tehran: Markaz Publications. [In Persian]
- Alam, Abdul Rahman (2001) Political science foundations, Tehran: Ney Publications. [In Persian]
- Cottingham, J. (1993) A Descartes Dictionary, Oxford: Blackwell.
- Farhadpour, Morad (2009) Pieces of thought, Tehran: Tarh-e Now Publications. [In Persian]
- Glengarry, J. (2011) Existence and man in Heidegger's thoughts, Trans. Mehdi Ghanbari, Quarterly of Kheradnameh, Vol. 3(7): 111. [In Persian]
- Golestani, Mojtaba (2015) Subject, nihilism, and political affairs, Tehran: Niloofar Publications. [In Persian]
- Heidegger, M. (1962) Being and time. Trans. J. Macquarri and E.Robinson.Oxford: Blackwell.
- Heidegger, Martin (1982) The basic problem of phenomenology and other essays, trans. W .lovitt: New York.
- Heidegger, Martin (2000) An Introduction to Metaphysics, Trans. G. Fried; R. polt: Yale University.
- Heidegger, Martin (2001) Zollikom seminars.Trans. Franz Mayer; Richard North Western University.
- Jabbari, Akbar (2011) Philosophy of gender reproduction, Isfahan: Porsesh [In Persian]
- Jabbari, Akbar (2014) Dasein analysis, Isfahan: Porsesh Publications. [In Persian]
- Jamadi, Siavash (2006) Background and time of phenomenology, Tehran: Qoqnoos Publications. [In Persian]
- Janicaud, Dominique (1996) The shadow of that thought, Trans. M, Gendre: Northwestern University Press.
- Khaleqi, Ahmad (2004) Wittgenstein, The struggle for truth, Cheshm Andaz-e Iran Magazine, Vol. 28, p. 102. [In Persian]
- Malayeri, Mohammad Hussein (2011) Philosophy of science, hermeneutic phenomenology, Tehran: Markaz Publications. [In Persian]
- Moinzadeh, Mehdi (2020) Must escape the subject cryptosystem, visit 12/15/99 at: https://Farhangemrooz.com. [In Persian]
- Parsa, Mehdi (2014) Derrida and Philosophy, Tehran: Elmi Publications. [In Persian]
- Pazouki, Shahram (1979) Descartes and modernity, Quarterly of Philosophy, No. 1: 176. [In Persian]
- Rajaei, Mustafa (2002) “Political theory, political philosophy, political ideology”, Trans. Ahmad Reza Taheripour, Journal of Political Science, p.24. [In Persian]
- Rikhtegaran, Mohammad Reza (2001) A reflection on the theoretical foundations of art, Tehran: Saghi Publications. [In Persian]
- Rikhtegaran, Mohammad Reza (2018) Articles on phenomenology, art, and modernity, Tehran: Saghi Publications. [In Persian]
- Sadeghi, Fatemeh (2012) Political Reconstruction of the People, Andisheh Pouya Magazine, No. 1: 48. [In Persian]
- Shariati, Ehsan (2020) Politics and government from the perspective of Martin Heidegger visited 12/15/99 at: https://www.Fararu.com. [In Persian]
- Tajik, Mohammad Reza (2004) Discourse, anti-discourse and politics, Tehran: Institute for Research and Development of Humanities. [In Persian]
- Tusi, Seyed Khalil al-Rahman (2008) “Mulla Sadra Shirazi and Martin Heidegger: An anthropological analysis of political philosophy”. Journal of Political Science, Vol. 11(43): 41. [In Persian]
)
ارسال نظر در مورد این مقاله