Journal of Philosophical Investigations

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی- پژوهشی

نویسنده

دانشیار پژوهشکده مطالعات فرهنگی و اجتماعی، تهران، ایران.

چکیده

In the early works of the eighteenth-century German philosopher, Immanuel Kant, besides explaining the philosophical and metaphysical foundations of various sciences, has illustrated a comprehensive philosophical system and desirable metaphysical critique. In his later works, through emphasizing the concept of Nature and the growth of Reason, he has considered special and multifaceted responsibilities for the Education and the University. For him, the alignment of knowledge and Nature in the university is the main mission of this institution; a mission that is required by the Faculty of Philosophy in a legitimate conflict with the top three faculties of Theology, Law, and Medicine to bring them in line with the design of Nature. This effort, in fact, is a necessary condition for accomplishing the future metaphysics and attaining the unity of knowledge and a complete philosophical system. This article, apart from explaining the idea of "the unity of knowledge" and a model of the unity of knowledge and nature in the conflict of faculties, attempts to show the relationship of this model with the plan of a complete future philosophical and metaphysical system in Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. In the following, the lessons of this approach have been considered, especially in the discussion of university independence for the reconstruction of Iran's higher education.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

From the Conflict of the Faculties to the Reconciliation of Knowledge and Nature at Kantian University and Its Lessons for Iran's Higher Education

نویسنده [English]

  • Reza Mahoozi

Associate Professor, Institute of Social and Cultural Studies, Tehran, Iran

چکیده [English]

In the early works of the eighteenth-century German philosopher, Immanuel Kant, besides explaining the philosophical and metaphysical foundations of various sciences, has illustrated a comprehensive philosophical system and desirable metaphysical critique. In his later works, through emphasizing the concept of Nature and the growth of Reason, he has considered special and multifaceted responsibilities for the Education and the University. For him, the alignment of knowledge and Nature in the university is the main mission of this institution; a mission that is required by the Faculty of Philosophy in a legitimate conflict with the top three faculties of Theology, Law, and Medicine to bring them in line with the design of Nature. This effort, in fact, is a necessary condition for accomplishing the future metaphysics and attaining the unity of knowledge and a complete philosophical system. This article, apart from explaining the idea of "the unity of knowledge" and a model of the unity of knowledge and nature in the conflict of faculties, attempts to show the relationship of this model with the plan of a complete future philosophical and metaphysical system in Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. In the following, the lessons of this approach have been considered, especially in the discussion of university independence for the reconstruction of Iran's higher education.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • knowledge
  • nature
  • conflict of faculties
  • unity of knowledge system
  • comprehensive philosophical system
  • future metaphysics
Allison, H. E. (2001). Kant’s Theory of Taste, 1st ed. Cambridge University Press.
Baths, R. E. (1996). Teleology and Scientific method in Kant's Critique of Judgment, Immanuel Kant critical Assessment. Vol. 4.
Elliott. (1996). The Unity of Kant’s Critique of Aesthetic Judgment, Immanuel Kant Critical Assessment, Vol.4.
Ginsborg, H. (2005). Kant’s Aesthetics and Teleology, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Gonzalez, Ana Marta. (2011). Kant's Philosophy of Education: between relational and systemic approaches. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 45(3): 433-454.
Kant, I. (1965). Critique of Pure Reason, translated by Norman Kemp Smith, Macmillan.
Kant, I. (1979). The Conflict of the faculties, translation and Introduction by Mary J. Gregor, New York.
Kant, I. (1987). First Introduction to the Critique of Judgment, Critique of Judgment, Werner Pluhar, translated by Indianapolis: Hackett.
Kant, I. (2004). Metaphysical Foundation of Natural Science, translated by Michael Friedman, Cambridge University Press.
Kant, I. (1788). Critique of Practical Reason, translated by Abbott, Thomas Kingsmill, Public domain in the USA.
Kant, I. (2003). Critique of Judgment, Translated by J. H. Bernard, New York: Hafner Publishing.
Kant, I. (2002). Groundwork for the metaphysics of morals, translated by Arnulf Zweig, edited by Thomas E. Hill, Jr. and Arnulf Zweig. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-875180-X.
Kant, I. (1900). On Education, translated by Annete Charton, Boston University press.
Kant, I. (1927). The Idea of a Universal History in a Cosmopolitan Plan. Hanover, New Hampshire: Sociological Press.
Kant, I. (2016). Perpetual Peace; A Philosophical Essay. Translated by Smith, Mary C. Project Gutenberg. pp. 120–128–137
Kraft, M. (1996). Kant's Theory of Teleology, Immanuel Kant Critical Assessment. Vol 4.
Mahoozi, Reza. (2009). From Nature to Freedom in Kant’s Thought, Knowledge, Shahid Beheshti University, 2(1), 113-131. (in Persian)
Zimmerman, E. (1996). Kant: The Aesthetic Judgment, Immanuel Kant critical Assessment. Vol. 4.
CAPTCHA Image