Journal of Philosophical Investigations

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی- پژوهشی

نویسنده

Associate Professor at Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, India

چکیده

Care ethics emphasizes the incessant nature of the work of care. The other-oriented focus of care work and the asymmetric relation between the one-caring and the cared-for entails a normative commitment to a cyclical conception of living time on the part of the one-caring. Moreover, in care, we must think of the time of the self as intertwined with the time of the other, thus constituting a mutual temporality. However, from the perspective of a feminist phenomenology of time, potential moral harms can be identified in the temporal structure of care, which may cause caring time to degenerate into uncaring time for the one-caring. To avoid such a predicament, it is imperative to develop an emancipatory ethics of time at the heart of the relational ontology of care. I argue that when various modalities of living time in care sediment into a coherentist ontology of time, only then is there a degradation into uncaring time. To positively reconstruct a radical notion of caring time, we must build a disruptive ontology within our conception of caring time, which highlights the significance of rupture, dissonance, disruption, and distortion within the everydayness of care. The argument in the paper serves a normative purpose since it draws our attention to what we owe morally to the one-caring in terms of their time. My analysis weaves together care ethics, feminist phenomenology and feminist writing from India through a philosophical engagement with Amar Jiban by Rassundari Devi.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

A Disruptive Ontology of Caring Time: overcoming moral harm in care through an emancipatory ethics of time

نویسنده [English]

  • Amrita Banerjee

Associate Professor at Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, India

چکیده [English]

Care ethics emphasizes the incessant nature of the work of care. The other-oriented focus of care work and the asymmetric relation between the one-caring and the cared-for entails a normative commitment to a cyclical conception of living time on the part of the one-caring. Moreover, in care, we must think of the time of the self as intertwined with the time of the other, thus constituting a mutual temporality. However, from the perspective of a feminist phenomenology of time, potential moral harms can be identified in the temporal structure of care, which may cause caring time to degenerate into uncaring time for the one-caring. To avoid such a predicament, it is imperative to develop an emancipatory ethics of time at the heart of the relational ontology of care. I argue that when various modalities of living time in care sediment into a coherentist ontology of time, only then is there a degradation into uncaring time. To positively reconstruct a radical notion of caring time, we must build a disruptive ontology within our conception of caring time, which highlights the significance of rupture, dissonance, disruption, and distortion within the everydayness of care. The argument in the paper serves a normative purpose since it draws our attention to what we owe morally to the one-caring in terms of their time. My analysis weaves together care ethics, feminist phenomenology and feminist writing from India through a philosophical engagement with Amar Jiban by Rassundari Devi.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Care Ethics
  • Feminist Phenomenology of Time
  • Feminist Philosophy in India
  • Rassundari Devi
  • Uncaring Time
  • Emancipatory Ethics of Time
  • Disruptive Ontology of Time
Βanerjee, A. (2008). Follett’s pragmatist ontology of relations: Potentials for a feminist perspective on violence. Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 22(1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1353/jsp.2008.0001
Beauvoir, S. de. (1976). The ethics of ambiguity, Trans by B. Frechtman New York, NY: Citadel Press/Kensington Publishing Corp.
Beauvoir, S. de. (2011). The second sex, Trans by C. Borde & S. Malovany-Chevallier, New York, NY: Vintage Books.
Burke, M. M. (2018). Gender as lived time: Reading the Second Sex for a feminist phenomenology of temporality. Hypatia, 33(1), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/hypa.12371
Devi, R. (2022). Amar Jiban, Trans. by E. Chatterjee, (Corrected and expanded 3rd ed.). Kolkata: Writer’s Workshop.
Held, V. (2006). The ethics of care: Personal, political, and global. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Kittay, E. F. (1999). Love’s labor: Essays on women, equality, and dependency. New York, Routledge.
Mandal, A. (2021). The construction of subjectivity in Rassundari Devi’s Amar Jiban. The Literary Herald, 7(1), 9–14. http://tlhjournal.com/uploads/products/12.amal-mandal-article.pdf
Mann, B. (2012). Creepers, flirts, heroes, and allies: Four theses on men and sexual harassment. APA Newsletter on Feminism and Philosophy, 11(2), 24–31. Retrieved from https://cdn.ymaws.com/www.apaonline.org/resource/resmgr/newsletters/feminism_v11n2.pdf
Noddings, N. (2013). Caring: A relational approach to ethics and moral education (2nd ed.). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. (Original work published 1984)
Paul, N. (2022). Writing history, writing life: Re-scripting nation through Rassundari’s words in the autobiography Amar Jiban. Akademos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Literary and Cultural Studies, 2(2), 32–42.
Ruddick, S. (1995). Maternal thinking: Toward a politics of peace. Boston, MA: Beacon Press. (Original work published 1989)
Sarkar, T. (1999). Words to win: The making of Amar Jiban: A modern autobiography. New Delhi: Kali for Women.
Tharu, S., & Lalita, K. (Eds.). (1991). Women’s writing in India: 600 B.C. to the early twentieth century (Vol. 1). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Veltman, A. (2006). Transcendence and immanence in the ethics of Simone de Beauvoir. In M. A. Simons (Ed.), The philosophy of Simone de Beauvoir: Critical essays (pp. 99–116). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press
CAPTCHA Image