Allison, H. (2004). Kant’s transcendental idealism (2nd ed.). Yale University Press.
Austin, J. L. (1939). Are there a priori concepts? Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume, 18, 83–105.
Bardon, A. (2005). Transcendental arguments. http://www.iep.utm.edu/trans-ar
Bardon, A. (2006). The Aristotelian prescription: Skepticism, retortion, and transcendental arguments. International Philosophical Quarterly, 46(3), 263–276.
Bell, D. (1999). Transcendental arguments and non-naturalistic anti-realism. In R. Stern (Ed.), Transcendental arguments: Problems and prospects (pp. 155–172). Oxford University Press.
Berkeley, G. (1710/1998). A treatise concerning the principles of human knowledge (D. M. Armstrong & H. H. Price, Eds.). Hackett Publishing Company. (Original work published 1710)
Brueckner, A. (1996). Modest transcendental arguments. Philosophical Perspectives, 10, 265–280.
Callanan, J. (2011). Making sense of doubt: Strawson’s anti-skepticism. Theoria, 77, 261–278.
Caranti, L. (2017). Kant and the scandal of philosophy. University of Toronto Press.
Cassam, Q. (1999). Self-directed transcendental arguments. In R. Stern (Ed.), Transcendental arguments: Problems and prospects (pp. 173–189). Oxford University Press.
Chang, H. (2008). Contingent transcendental arguments for metaphysical principles. In M. Massimi (Ed.), Kant and philosophy of science (pp. 157–173). Cambridge University Press.
Davidson, D. (1986). A coherence theory of truth and knowledge. In Perception, knowledge and belief: Selected essays (pp. 307–319). Cambridge University Press.
D’Oro, G. (2019). Between ontological hubris and epistemic humility: Collingwood, Kant and the role of transcendental arguments. Noûs, 27, 336–357.
Finnis, J. (2011). Scepticism’s self-refutation. In Reason in action: Collected essays (Volume 1) (pp. 1–15). Oxford University Press.
Franks, P. (2005). Transcendental arguments, reason, and scepticism: Contemporary debates and the origins of post-Kantianism. In R. Stern (Ed.), Transcendental arguments: Problems and prospects (pp. 109–142). Oxford University Press.
Frede, M. (1984). The sceptic’s two kinds of assent and the question of the possibility of knowledge. In R. Rorty, J. B. Schneewind, & Q. Skinner (Eds.), Philosophy in history: Essays on the historiography of philosophy (pp. 255–278). Cambridge University Press.
Giladi, P. (2016). New directions for transcendental claims. Grazer Philosophische Studien, 93, 212–231.
Glock, H.-J. (2003). Strawson and analytic Kantianism. In H.-J. Glock (Ed.), Strawson and Kant (pp. 1–24). Oxford University Press.
Guyer, P. (1987). Kant and the claims of knowledge. Cambridge University Press.
Grundmann, T., & Misselhorn, C. (2003). Transcendental arguments and realism. In H.-J. Glock (Ed.), Strawson and Kant (pp. 113–130). Oxford University Press.
Houlgate, S. (2015). Is Hegel’s Phenomenology of spirit an essay in transcendental argument? In S. Gardner & M. Grist (Eds.), The transcendental turn (pp. 1–12). Oxford University Press.
Hume, D. (1739–1740/2000). A treatise of human nature (D. F. Norton & M. J. Norton, Eds.). Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1739–1740)
Kant, I. (2005). Notes and fragments (C. Bowman, P. Guyer, & F. Rauscher, Trans.). Cambridge University Press.
Kant, I. (1781-1787/1998). Critique of pure reason (P. Guyer & A. Wood, Trans.). Cambridge University Press.
Illies, C. F. R. (2003). The grounds of ethical judgement: New transcendental arguments in moral philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Lockie, R. (2018). Free will and epistemology: A defence of the transcendental argument for freedom. Bloomsbury.
McDowell, J. (2006). The disjunctive conception of experience as material for a transcendental argument. Teorema, 25, 19–33; reprinted in The engaged intellect: Philosophical essays (pp. 225–242). Harvard University Press.
Mizrahi, M. (2012). Transcendental arguments, conceivability, and global vs local skepticism. Philosophia, 45, 735–749.
Moore, G. E. (1903/1993). Proof of an external world. In T. Baldwin (Ed.), G. E. Moore: Selected writings (pp. 147–170). Routledge.
Peacocke, C. (1989). Transcendental arguments in the theory of content. Oxford University Press.
Pereira, R. H. (2012). What is nonconceptualism in Kant’s philosophy? Philosophical Studies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-011-9851-x
Pereira, R. H. (2014). Argumentos transcendentais. In J. Branquinho & R. Santos (Eds.), Compêndio em linha de problemas de filosofia analítica (pp. 1–21). Centro de Filosofia da Universidade de Lisboa. ISBN: 978-989-8553-22-5.
Pereira, R. H. (2016). Stroud and transcendental arguments revisited. Sképsis, 7(14), 188–206.
Pereira, R. H. (2017). A nonconceptualist reading of the B-deduction. Philosophical Studies.
Pereira, R. H. (2017b). A non-dual epistemic phenomenalist reading of Kant’s idealism. In Contemporary studies in Kantian philosophy (Vol. II, pp. 1–22).
Pereira, R. H. (2017c). Transcendental arguments against metaphysical external-world skepticism. Sképsis, 8(15), 157–178.
Pereira, R. H. (2018a). The refutation of Mendelssohnian idealism. In Contemporary studies in Kantian philosophy (Vol. 3, pp. 1–39).
Pereira, R. H. (2018b). What is the scandal of philosophy? International Journal for the Study of Skepticism, 8(3), 141–166.
Pereira, R. H. (2019a). The real target of Kant’s “refutation.” Kantian Journal, 38(3), 7–31.
Pereira, R. H. (2019b). One-object-plus-phenomenalism. Kant-e-Prints. Retrieved from kanteprints@cle.unicamp.br
Pereira, R. H. (2019c). Transcendental idealism, noumenal metaphysical monism, and epistemological phenomenalism. Analytica, 24, 1–24.
Pereira, R. H. (2020a). Disentangling Cartesian global skepticism from Cartesian problematic external-world idealism in Kant’s refutation. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie. https://doi.org/10.1515/agph-2020-1012.
Pereira, R. H. (2020b). Transcendental deduction against Hume's challenge to reason. Kant-e-Print, 15(2), 6–31.
Pereira, R. H. (2021). Phenomenalism and Kant. Con-textos Kantianos, 14, 1–14.
Pereira, R. H. (2022a). Rejecting the plea for modesty: Kant’s truth-directed transcendental argument based on self-consciousness of our own existence. Studies in Transcendental Philosophy, 3(3).
Pereira, R. H. (2022b). Neo-Pyrrhonism: A new reading of Pyrrhonian acceptance in the light of the contemporary philosophy of mind. Sképsis: Revista de Filosofia, XIII(24), 46–62. https://doi.org/10.XXXX/XXXX
Porchat, O. (2006). Rumo ao ceticismo. Unesp. Translation is mine.
Putnam, H. (1981). Reason, truth and history. Cambridge University Press.
Rähme, B. (2017). Transcendental arguments, epistemically constrained truth, and moral discourse. In G. Gava & R. Stern (Eds.), Pragmatism, Kant, and transcendental philosophy (pp. 183–200). Routledge.
Rockmore, T., & Breazeale, D. (Eds.). (2014). Fichte and transcendental philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan.
Russell, M., & Reynolds, J. (2011). Transcendental arguments about other minds and intersubjectivity. Philosophy Compass, 6, 300–311.
Stapleford, S. (2008). Kant’s transcendental arguments: Disciplining pure reason. Continuum.
Sextus Empiricus. (1976). Sextus Empiricus (R. G. Bury, Ed.; Vols. 1–4). Harvard University Press; William Heinemann Ltd. (Original work published in the Loeb Classical Library).
Smith, P. J. (2023). Neo-Pyrrhonism: A contemporary version of skepticism. Sententiae, 42(3), 47–66.
Stern, R. (Ed). (1999). Transcendental arguments: Problems and prospects. Oxford University Press.
Stern, R. (2007). Transcendental arguments: A plea for modesty. Grazer Philosophische Studien, 47, 143–161; reprinted in C. Beyer & A. Burri (Eds.), Philosophical knowledge: Its possibility and scope. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Strawson, P. F. (1959). Individuals: An essay in descriptive metaphysics. Methuen.
Strawson, P. F. (1966). The bounds of sense: An essay on Kant’s critique of pure reason. Methuen.
Strawson, P. F. (1984). Skepticism and naturalism: Some varieties. Methuen.
Stroud, B. (1968). Transcendental arguments. Journal of Philosophy, 65, 241–256.
Stroud, B. (1984). The significance of philosophical skepticism. The Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press.
Stroud, B. (1999). The goal of transcendental arguments. In R. Stern (Ed.), Transcendental arguments: Problems and prospects (pp. 155–172). Oxford University Press.
Vahid, H. (2011). Skepticism and varieties of transcendental argument. Logos & Episteme, 2, 395–411.
Wang, J. (2011). Radical skepticism, how-possible questions, and modest transcendental arguments. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 25, 210–226.
Westphal, K. (2004). Epistemic reflection and transcendental proof. In H.-J. Glock (Ed.), Strawson and Kant (pp. 131–146). Oxford University Press.
)
ارسال نظر در مورد این مقاله