The Intersection of Rousseau’s Participatory Democracy and Habermas’ Communicative Action: a transformation in geography education

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی- پژوهشی

نویسنده

دانشیار گروه آموزش جغرافیا، دانسگاه فرهنگیان، تهران، ایران.

چکیده

In the contemporary world, education is recognized as a fundamental tool for fostering active, responsible, and capable citizens who require processes that strengthen participation, mutual understanding, and rational dialogue. The present study aims to examine the application of Rousseau’s participatory democracy and Habermas’ communicative action in the teaching of spatial sciences, with a particular focus on geography. The research adopts an action research design with an applied orientation. The study population consisted of 24 undergraduate geography students enrolled in the course Urban Geography of Iran. Data were collected and analyzed across 14 instructional sessions through observation, evaluation, and the interpretation of lived experiences within an interpretive framework. The research process followed a cyclical pattern, including problem identification, theoretical review, formation of focus groups, and dialogue-oriented consensus building. Findings indicate that democratic, participatory, and communicative approaches to spatial education emerge gradually and require a process-oriented foundation. Accordingly, the integration of Rousseau’s participatory democracy with Habermas’ communicative action demands active facilitation by instructors and the reinforcement of intra- and inter-group interactions. The results further reveal that combining these two approaches in geography education—particularly in spatially oriented courses—creates a pathway for transitioning from teacher-centered learning to participatory–discursive learning. This shift enhances skills of spatial analysis, critique, collaboration, and debate, thereby deepening learning and understanding of spatial concepts. Ultimately, the study proposes a practical framework for democratic, interactive, and active education, serving as an illustrative example of implementing these philosophical approaches in higher education.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Intersection of Rousseau’s Participatory Democracy and Habermas’ Communicative Action: a transformation in geography education

نویسنده [English]

  • Alireza Daviran
Associate Professor of Geography Education Department, Farhangian University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

In the contemporary world, education is recognized as a fundamental tool for fostering active, responsible, and capable citizens who require processes that strengthen participation, mutual understanding, and rational dialogue. The present study aims to examine the application of Rousseau’s participatory democracy and Habermas’ communicative action in the teaching of spatial sciences, with a particular focus on geography. The research adopts an action research design with an applied orientation. The study population consisted of 24 undergraduate geography students enrolled in the course Urban Geography of Iran. Data were collected and analyzed across 14 instructional sessions through observation, evaluation, and the interpretation of lived experiences within an interpretive framework. The research process followed a cyclical pattern, including problem identification, theoretical review, formation of focus groups, and dialogue-oriented consensus building. Findings indicate that democratic, participatory, and communicative approaches to spatial education emerge gradually and require a process-oriented foundation. Accordingly, the integration of Rousseau’s participatory democracy with Habermas’ communicative action demands active facilitation by instructors and the reinforcement of intra- and inter-group interactions. The results further reveal that combining these two approaches in geography education—particularly in spatially oriented courses—creates a pathway for transitioning from teacher-centered learning to participatory–discursive learning. This shift enhances skills of spatial analysis, critique, collaboration, and debate, thereby deepening learning and understanding of spatial concepts. Ultimately, the study proposes a practical framework for democratic, interactive, and active education, serving as an illustrative example of implementing these philosophical approaches in higher education.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Participatory Democracy
  • Communicative Action
  • Rousseau and Habermas
  • Action Research
  • Geography Education

مراجع

Alton Lee, A. (2012). Cooperative learning in physical education: A research-based approach (Book review). Qualitative Research in Education, 2(1), 228–233. http://dx.doi.org/10.17583/qre.2012.453
Barber, B. R. (1984). Strong democracy: Participatory politics for a new age. University of California Press.
Baskerville, R. L. (1999). Investigating information systems with action research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 2(1), 19.
Biswas, S., & Biswas, P. (2022). The legacy of Rousseau and its importance in modern times: The role of participatory democracy. Bharati International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development, 2(8), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.70798/Bijmrd/0208000
Bui, D. X., & Bui, T. X. (2021). Rousseau’s philosophical and educational innovation in Vietnam today. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 12(4), 197–208.
Daviran, A. (2025). An experimental investigation of the impact of self-directed pedagogy in place-based education. Quarterly Journal of Research in Social Studies Education, 7(1), 43–64. https://doi.org/10.48310/rsse.2025.4382
Daviran, A. (2026). Evaluation of action learning in based place Geography. Geographical Engineering of Territory, 10(2), e220820. https://doi.org/10.22034/jget.2025.512250.1616
Dryzek, J. S. (2000). Deliberative democracy and beyond: Liberals, critics, contestations. Oxford University Press.
Gholami, A. (2018). Habermas’ communicative action: A look at its practical application in school management. School Management, 18, 53–55.
Gutek, G. L. (2005). Historical and philosophical foundations of education (4th ed.). Pearson/Merrill/Prentice Hall.
Habermas, J. (1991). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society (T. Burger & F. Lawrence, Trans.; 1st MIT Press paperback ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy (W. Rehg, Trans.). MIT Press.
Hong, H. Y., Lin, P. Y., & Lee, H. Y. (2019). Developing effective knowledge-building environments through constructivist teaching beliefs and technology-integration knowledge: A survey of middle-school teachers in northern Taiwan. Journal of Learning and Individual Differences, 76, 1–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2019.101787
Istgaldi, M., Shokouhi, M. A., Rahnama, M. R., & Mirkatouli, J. (2015). Communicative action as a basis for realization of citizen participation in urban development process (Case study: City of Gorgan). Geographical Urban Planning Research (GUPR), 3(3), 263–283. https://doi.org/10.22059/jurbangeo.2015.55883
Jamshidirad, M., & Jafarian, H. (2024). Mediating role of indigenous culture and communication in the effect of restorative justice approach on regional dispute resolution. Police Cultural Studies, 10(4), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.22034/jpcs.2024.1277373.1290
Khashaei, V., & Farsi, S. (2024). Qualitative and mixed research methods (1st ed.). Fowzan Publishing: Tehran.
Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2006). Designing qualitative research (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
McNiff, J., & Whitehead, J. (2006). All you need to know about action research. London: SAGE Publications.
Mertler, C. A. (2024). Action research: Improving schools and empowering educators (7th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Mohammadzadeh, M., Safarnavadeh, M., & Ahghar, G. (2022). The effect of constructivist-based approach of teaching in sciences course on students' cognitive styles. Journal of Educational Psychology Studies, 19(45), 69–86. https://doi.org/10.22111/jeps.2022.6574
Moradi, E., & Ramezani, G. (2023). Application of opinions and philosophy of Jean-Jacques Rousseau in medical education. Journal of Medical Education, 18(3), 611–613.
Onder, M. (2018). J. J. Rousseau, Emile and religious education. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 6(7), 1539–1545. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2018.060714
Pateman, C. (1970). Participation and democratic theory. Cambridge University Press.
Pateman, C. (2014). Rousseau, John Stuart Mill and G. D. H. Cole: A participatory theory of democracy. In Participation and democratic theory (pp. 22–44). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511720444.002
Rousseau, J.-J. (1762). Emile, or on education (G. Zirkzadeh, Trans.). Tehran: Nahid Publishing.
Rousseau, J.-J. (1979). The social contract (G. D. H. Cole, Trans.). Penguin Books. (Original work published 1762)
Rousseau, J.-J. (2010). Émile, or, on education: Includes Emile and Sophie, or, the solitaries. University Press of New England.
Sajadian, N., & Damanbagh, S. (2021). Geographical analysis of the effect place (objective environment) on the sense of happiness of Ahvaz citizens based on the happy city approach. Geographical Urban Planning Research (GUPR), 9(3), 761–799. https://doi.org/10.22059/jurbangeo.2021.318477.1454
Shahbazi, M. (2022). Feasibility of implementing democracy on citizen participation in social contract theory based on the ideas of Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau. In Proceedings of the 5th International and 6th National Conference on Law and Political Science (Tehran, Iran).
Shakoei, H. (2011). New perspectives in urban geography (15th ed., Vol. 1). Tehran: Samt.
Siavoshi, L. (2016). The project of the lifeworld in late Husserlian thought. Philosophical Studies, Phenomenology Special Issue, 10(18), 37–60.
Sobhannejad, M., Mohammadi, A., & Ahmadabadi Arani, N. (2020). Teachings to improve the element of conversation in the teaching-learning process: From the comparative study of Socratic dialectic and Habermas communication. Teaching and Learning Research, 17(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.22070/tlr.2021.3213
Taraḥāni, H., & Partovi, P. (2017). Analysis of public interest in the theory of communicative planning. In Proceedings of the International Congress on Interdisciplinary Studies in Basic Sciences and Engineering (Organized by: Innovative Thinkers Scientific Association, Tehran, Iran).
Trohler, D. (2023). The global reception of Rousseau’s educational thought. Routledge.
ارسال نظر در مورد این مقاله
CAPTCHA Image
مجله پژوهش های فلسفی
دوره 20، شماره 54 - شماره پیاپی 54
مقالات
شماره 54 بهار 1405
بهمن 1404
صفحه 483-502

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار