The Political Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی- پژوهشی

نویسنده

دانشیار گروه علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران.

10.22034/jpiut.2026.70031.4315

چکیده

This paper examines the political philosophy of Artificial Intelligence (AI) through three distinct approaches: optimistic positivist scientism, critical middle ground, and phenomenological pessimism. The central issue addressed is the ethical and political implications of AI, specifically how it influences governance, social structures, and human autonomy. The research questions explore how AI can be understood in terms of its potential and risks, how different political philosophies interpret its role, and what governance models can mitigate its negative consequences. The methodology adopted is a comparative analysis of key thinkers and their contributions to the debate on AI. The framework includes positivist, critical theory, and phenomenological perspectives, with a focus on how these paradigms inform the understanding of technology and its societal impact. Key theorists discussed include Francis Bacon, Karl Marx, Yuval Harari, Jürgen Habermas, Martin Heidegger, and Hannah Arendt, each offering a unique viewpoint on the nature of AI and its implications for governance and human existence. The findings highlight three divergent views: the optimistic positivist approach sees AI as a tool for progress, advocating for technological innovation and global governance; the critical middle ground emphasizes ethical oversight and regulation to prevent social inequality; and the phenomenological pessimism warns of AI’s potential to undermine human freedom and autonomy, leading to a dystopian, technocratic society. The study concludes that while AI offers significant potential for improving human life, it also raises profound challenges that require careful regulation, ethical consideration, and a commitment to preserving democratic freedoms.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Political Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence

نویسنده [English]

  • Rouhollah Eslami
Associate Professor of Political Science Department, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran
چکیده [English]

This paper examines the political philosophy of Artificial Intelligence (AI) through three distinct approaches: optimistic positivist scientism, critical middle ground, and phenomenological pessimism. The central issue addressed is the ethical and political implications of AI, specifically how it influences governance, social structures, and human autonomy. The research questions explore how AI can be understood in terms of its potential and risks, how different political philosophies interpret its role, and what governance models can mitigate its negative consequences. The methodology adopted is a comparative analysis of key thinkers and their contributions to the debate on AI. The framework includes positivist, critical theory, and phenomenological perspectives, with a focus on how these paradigms inform the understanding of technology and its societal impact. Key theorists discussed include Francis Bacon, Karl Marx, Yuval Harari, Jürgen Habermas, Martin Heidegger, and Hannah Arendt, each offering a unique viewpoint on the nature of AI and its implications for governance and human existence. The findings highlight three divergent views: the optimistic positivist approach sees AI as a tool for progress, advocating for technological innovation and global governance; the critical middle ground emphasizes ethical oversight and regulation to prevent social inequality; and the phenomenological pessimism warns of AI’s potential to undermine human freedom and autonomy, leading to a dystopian, technocratic society. The study concludes that while AI offers significant potential for improving human life, it also raises profound challenges that require careful regulation, ethical consideration, and a commitment to preserving democratic freedoms.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Political Philosophy
  • Critical Theory
  • Governance
  • Phenomenological Pessimism

مراجع

Acemoglu, D. (2019). Technology and the Future of Labor. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 33(2), 7-36.
Agamben, G. (2005). State of Exception. University of Chicago Press.
Aristotle. (1996). Politics (C. D. C. Reeve, Trans.). Hackett Publishing Company.
Arendt, H. (1951). The Origins of Totalitarianism. Harcourt Brace.
Bacon, F. (1620). Novum Organum. London: John Bill.
Binns, R. (2018). AI and the Future of Education: Challenges and Opportunities. Journal of Educational Technology, 45(2), 122-138.
Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies. W.W. Norton & Company.
Castells, M. (2010). The Rise of the Network Society. Wiley-Blackwell.
Coeckelbergh, M. (2020). AI Ethics. MIT Press.
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Pantheon Books.
Friedman, T. L. (2017). Thank You for Being Late: An Optimist's Guide to Thriving in the Age of Accelerations. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Fukuyama, F. (2018). Identity: The Demand for Dignity and the Politics of Resentment. Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.
Harari, Y. N. (2016). Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow. HarperCollins.
Harari, Y. N. (2018). 21 Lessons for the 21st Century. Spiegel & Grau.
Heidegger, M. (1977). The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays. Harper & Row.
Hobbes, T. (1994). Leviathan (E. Curley, Ed.). Hackett Publishing Company. (Original work published 1651)
Husserl, E. (1936). The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology. Northwestern University Press.
Kissinger, H. (2021). The Age of AI and Our Human Future. Little, Brown and Company.
Kuhn, T. S. (1996). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (3rd ed.). University of Chicago Press.
Locke, J. (1980). Second Treatise of Government (C. B. Macpherson, Ed.). Hackett Publishing Company. (Original work published 1690)
Marr, B. (2018). Artificial Intelligence in Practice: How 50 Successful Companies Used AI and Machine Learning to Solve Problems. Wiley.
Merton, R. K. (1936). The Unanticipated Consequences of Purposive Social Action. American Sociological Review, 1(6), 894-904.
Merton, R. K. (1973). The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. University of Chicago Press.
Marcuse, H. (1964). One-Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society. Beacon Press.
Narayanan, A., Bonneau, J., Felten, E., Miller, A., & Goldfeder, S. (2016). Bitcoin and Cryptocurrency Technologies. Princeton University Press.
Nye, J. S. (2011). The Future of Power. PublicAffairs.
O’Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. Crown Publishing Group.
Pasquale, F. (2015). The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms That Control Money and Information. Harvard University Press.
Pence, H. (2020). Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights. Oxford University Press.
Peters, M. A. (2017). Blockchain Education: Revolutionizing the Future of Higher Education. Springer.
Postman, N. (1992). Technopoly: The Surrender of Culture to Technology. Vintage Books.
Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press.
Rosenau, J. N. (1997). Along the Domestic-Foreign Frontier: Exploring Governance in a Turbulent World. Cambridge University Press.
Rousseau, J.-J. (1997). The Social Contract (C. Betts, Trans.). Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1762)
Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2021). Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach (4th ed.). Pearson.
Schwann, M. (2020). Artificial Intelligence and Its 15 Categories. Springer.
Singer, P. W. (2009). Wired for War: The Robotics Revolution and Conflict in the 21st Century. Penguin Books.
Sassen, S. (2016). Expulsions: Brutality and Complexity in the Global Economy. Harvard University Press.
Tapscott, D., & Tapscott, A. (2016). Blockchain Revolution: How the Technology Behind Bitcoin and Other Cryptocurrencies is Changing the World. Penguin.
Weber, M. (1949). The Methodology of the Social Sciences. Free Press.
Zohar, D. (2019). Blockchain and the Future of Democracy: Decentralized Voting. Blockchain Press.
Zuboff, S. (2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. PublicAffairs.
ارسال نظر در مورد این مقاله
CAPTCHA Image
مجله پژوهش های فلسفی
دوره 20، شماره 54 - شماره پیاپی 54
مقالات
شماره 54 بهار 1405
بهمن 1404
صفحه 463-482

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار