Human Dignity as the Normative Foundation of Legal Legitimacy: A Pancasila-Based Philosophical Framework

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی- پژوهشی

نویسنده

دانشجوی دکتری گروه حقوق، دانشگاه سیاه کوالا، باندا آسه، اندونزی

چکیده

This article examines human dignity as the normative foundation of legal legitimacy within the framework of Pancasila. This research stems from the conceptual problem that legal legitimacy is often reduced to formal legality, procedural compliance, and policy effectiveness, thus neglecting the dimension of normative justification toward legal subjects. The purpose of this research is to explain how Pancasila positions human dignity as a non-derivative principle that serves as the foundation and limit for the validity of law and the exercise of state power. Using a normative-philosophical approach, this article analyzes the relationship between Pancasila as a material basic norm, human dignity as the right to justification, and its implications for the principles of the rule of law, democracy, and legal pluralism. The research results indicate that in the Pancasila legal system, legal legitimacy cannot be understood solely as the outcome of procedures or the will of the majority but rather as a normative practice that must be rationally accountable to humans as dignified subjects. This research also shows that legal pluralism, including customary law practices, can serve as a means of actualizing human dignity as long as it remains within the horizon of rational justification and the prevention of institutional humiliation. This finding confirms that Pancasila offers a coherent philosophical framework for integrating legal legitimacy, democracy, and human dignity in a pluralistic society and provides a normative basis for human-centered legal reform.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Human Dignity as the Normative Foundation of Legal Legitimacy: A Pancasila-Based Philosophical Framework

نویسنده [English]

  • Erwin Susilo
PhD Candidate of Law Department, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, Indonesia
چکیده [English]

This article examines human dignity as the normative foundation of legal legitimacy within the framework of Pancasila. This research stems from the conceptual problem that legal legitimacy is often reduced to formal legality, procedural compliance, and policy effectiveness, thus neglecting the dimension of normative justification toward legal subjects. The purpose of this research is to explain how Pancasila positions human dignity as a non-derivative principle that serves as the foundation and limit for the validity of law and the exercise of state power. Using a normative-philosophical approach, this article analyzes the relationship between Pancasila as a material basic norm, human dignity as the right to justification, and its implications for the principles of the rule of law, democracy, and legal pluralism. The research results indicate that in the Pancasila legal system, legal legitimacy cannot be understood solely as the outcome of procedures or the will of the majority but rather as a normative practice that must be rationally accountable to humans as dignified subjects. This research also shows that legal pluralism, including customary law practices, can serve as a means of actualizing human dignity as long as it remains within the horizon of rational justification and the prevention of institutional humiliation. This finding confirms that Pancasila offers a coherent philosophical framework for integrating legal legitimacy, democracy, and human dignity in a pluralistic society and provides a normative basis for human-centered legal reform.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Human dignity
  • Legal Legitimacy
  • Pancasila
  • Rule of Law
  • Legal Pluralism
  • Democracy

مراجع

Al-Asmari, K. (2023). Protecting human dignity in the Sunnah. Islamic Sciences Journal, 12(4), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.25130/jis.21.12.4.1
Andreetta, S. (2026). Human dignity on trial: Welfare judges, immigration politics and social change. Law and Policy, 48(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/lapo.70007
Ashenden, S., & Hess, A. (2022). Think and thin—or political? Judith N. Shklar and Avishai Margalit on betrayal. Global Intellectual History, 7(4), 650–665. https://eprints.bbk.ac.uk
Bigo, D. (2025). The banalisation of 'suspicion': Politics of prevention, digitisation of prediction, fate of travellers. International Migration, 63(4), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.70047
Boister, N. (2025). The "general part" of transnational criminal law. European Journal of International Law, 36(2), 433–460. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chaf025
Čekavičius, L. (2022). Capabilities approach as a metapolitical category: Analysis of M. Nussbaum's conception of justice. Problemos, 102, 90–104. https://doi.org/10.15388/Problemos.2022.102.7
Cruz, A. W. (2023). Human dignity in the Chilean constitutional scholarship and case law. Estudios Constitucionales, 21(2), 3–34. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-52002023000200003
Douglas, S., Macaden, L., Muirhead, K., Webster, E., & Ellis, L. (2025). Dignity and human rights—Survey findings on undergraduate nursing students' conceptualisation and operationalisation of dignity. Nursing Open, 12(4), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.70194
Edeji, O. C. (2025). Intersections of the right to education and human dignity in international human rights law: A purpose-based analysis. Laws, 14(3), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws14030033
Fikfak, V., & Izvorova, L. (2022). Language and persuasion: Human dignity at the European Court of Human Rights. Human Rights Law Review, 22(3), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngac018
Gold, A. S., & Smith, H. E. (2025). Managing legal concepts: Maintenance, modulation, modification. The American Journal of Jurisprudence, 70(3), 163–182. https://academic.oup.com
Golia, A. J. R. (2024). The relationship between global law and the individual: Symbiosis, oscillation, and strategic subjectification. American Journal of Comparative Law, 72(3), 601–640. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcl/avae028
Gregory, M. (2025). Deciding with dignity: Automated decision-making, the rule of law, and procedural disrespect. Ratio Juris, 38(3), 172–197. https://doi.org/10.1111/raju.70007
Gutschmidt, H. (2023). Concept of human dignity in ethics and law. Philosophische Rundschau, 70(4), 457–482.
Hefni, W., Ahmadi, R., & Mustofa, I. (2022). Reinventing the human dignity in Islamic law discourse: The wasatiyah approaches from Khaled Abou El-Fadl to the interreligious relation. Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam, 16(2), 239–254. https://doi.org/10.24090/mnh.v16i2.6928
Henderson, K. (2024). Ask a political scientist: A conversation with Nicholas Xenos about critical theory, democratic politics, and the problems with patriotism. Polity, 56(1), 187–198. https://doi.org/10.1086/728032
Horák, F. (2022). Human dignity in legal argumentation: A functional perspective. European Constitutional Law Review, 18(2), 237–263. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1574019622000141
Jiménez, M. J. O., & Dávila, J. A. (2025). Human dignity and the recognition of foreign judgements in Colombia. Revista de Derecho Privado, 49, 359–380. https://doi.org/10.18601/01234366.49.11
Junaidi, J. (2024). Implementation of penal mediation "Tepung Tawar" as criminal case settlement in Palembang, South Sumatra. Teumulong: Journal of Community Service, 2(2), 79–84. https://iesrjournal.com
Karliuha, Y. (2024). Human dignity as the foundation of peremptory norms in international law: Theoretical considerations and practical implications. International and Comparative Law Review, 24(1), 74–84. https://doi.org/10.2478/iclr-2024-0004
Kirste, S. (2024). Human dignity as a foundation of law. Ratio Publica, 4(2), 625–613. https://doi.org/10.25162/9783515104838
Kiss, L. N., & Mercz, M. (2022). A win-win approach in human rights advocacy? Lessons learned from the book titled "Human Dignity and Law: Studies on the Dignity of Human Life." Forum Prawnicze, 2022(6), 88–99. https://doi.org/10.32082/fp.6(74).2022.1097
Mansur, T. M., Muazzin, M., Abdullah, M. A., Ali, H., Usman, M. Bin, & Miranti, A. (2025). Mediating tradition: The role of law enforcement in customary law disputes. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 13(2), 1183–1208. https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v13i2.1921
Mansur, T. M., Sulaiman, & Ali, H. (2020). Adat court in Aceh, Indonesia: A review of law. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 8(2), 423–442. https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v8i2.443
Mejía Fernández, R., & Romero, J. (2022). Social evolution in Jürgen Habermas: Towards a weak anthropological naturalism between Kant and Darwin. Theoria (Sweden), 88(3), 607–628. https://doi.org/10.1111/theo.12383
Meyer, S. (2024). Toleration in the European Union: A forgotten virtue. Transnational Legal Theory, 15(2), 145–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/20414005.2024.2369410
Meyrick, J. (2025). (Re)thinking culture thickly: The public realm from Hannah Arendt's The Human Condition to the Bennett Institute report. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/13675494251329742
Mulligan, T. (2022). [Review of the book The code of capital: How the law creates wealth and inequality, by K. Pistor]. Business Ethics Quarterly, 32(1), 199–202. https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2021.49
Muñoz, C. S. (2023). Women's rights, peace, and democracy: A problematic relationship. Politicka Misao, 60(2), 31–51. https://doi.org/10.20901/pm.60.2.02
Nurdiansyah, E., Maftuh, B., & Malihah, E. (2023). Tepung Tawar Perdamaian: Resolusi konflik berlandaskan nilai-nilai Pancasila di Sumatera Selatan. Satwika: Kajian Ilmu Budaya dan Perubahan Sosial, 7(2), 285–294. https://doi.org/10.22219/satwika.v7i2.26352
Pada, R. T. D. S. (2022). The progress of asymmetries in Axel Honneth's recognition theory. Philosophia (Philippines), 23(1), 152–165. https://doi.org/10.46992/PIJP.23.1.A.9
Pastor Muñoz, N. (2023). Why international criminal law can and should be conceived with supra-positive law: The non-positivistic nature of international criminal legality. Criminal Law and Philosophy, 17(2), 381–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572-022-09628-6
Perrin, P., Wozniak, J., Lande, A., Morris, S., Kozybay, Z., Soriano Nuncio, A., Hembling, J., & Castleman, T. (2023). Upholding human dignity: A literature review. University of Notre Dame. https://doi.org/10.7274/76537082b53
Pistor, K. (2022). Legal coding beyond capital? European Law Open, 1(2), 344–350. https://doi.org/10.1017/elo.2022.19
Prasetyo, T. (2025). Keadilan bermartabat: Reconstructing legal authority in Indonesia. Cogito, 17(2), 122–137.
Reath, A. (2022). Kantian constructivism and Kantian constitutivism: Some reflections. Kant Yearbook, 14(1), 45–69. https://doi.org/10.1515/kantyb-2022-0003
Rosenkranzová, O. (2024). The problem of philosophical foundations of human dignity in law. International and Comparative Law Review, 24(1), 31–51. https://doi.org/10.2478/iclr-2024-0002
Sajó, A. (2024). Militant rule of law and not-so-bad law. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 16(3), 525–549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-024-00221-8
Saldanha, J., & Do Nascimento, V. R. (2024). Institutional cosmopolitanism and cosmopolitanism of responsibility: Spaces for human rights and duties. Araucaria, 26(55), 625–654. https://doi.org/10.12795/araucaria.2024.i55.27
Satola, A. P. (2025). A service conception of democratic authority. Res Publica, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-025-09706-1
Steinmann, R. (2025). The genesis of the generic idea of human dignity in South African law. Fundamina, 31(1), 148–179. https://doi.org/10.47348/FUND/v31/i1a6
Susilo, E. (2024). Integrating Spinoza's philosophy of civil law into Indonesian judicial reasoning: Toward a justice-oriented legal framework. Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum, 13(2), 173–190. https://doi.org/10.14421/c4016524
Susilo, E. (2025a). Artificial intelligence in Indonesian judicial decisions: A Pancasila-based normative model with a comparative approach. International Comparative Jurisprudence, 11(2), 170–179. https://doi.org/10.13165/j.icj.2025.11.02.002
Susilo, E. (2025b). Natural justice, procedural justice, and the judge's role in the Pancasila-based rule of law. Yurispruden: Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Malang, 8(2), 177–196. https://doi.org/10.33474/yur.v8i2.23835
Warne, N. A. (2022). Avishai Margalit and theology of institutions. Studies in Christian Ethics, 35(3), 607–621. https://doi.org/10.1177/09539468221090399
Widiyono, T., & Khan, M. Z. K. (2023). Legal certainty in land rights acquisition in Indonesia's national land law. Law Reform: Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum, 19(1), 128–147. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v19i1.48393
Wilkinson, M. A. (2024). The authoritarian nature of common good constitutionalism. American Journal of Jurisprudence, 69(1), 89–106. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajj/auae012
Zalewska, M., & Heidemann, C. (2024). Grundnorm and grounding: A modern metaphysics for Hans Kelsen's pure theory? Bialostockie Studia Prawnicze, 29(3), 55–75. https://doi.org/10.15290/bsp.2024.29.03.04
ارسال نظر در مورد این مقاله
CAPTCHA Image
مجله پژوهش های فلسفی
دوره 20، شماره 56 - شماره پیاپی 56
مقالات
شماره 56 پاییز 1405
مهر 1405
صفحه 767-782

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار