The Advantages and Disadvantages of the Pragmatist Approach to Educational Management

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی- پژوهشی

نویسنده

استادیار گروه مدیریت آموزشی، دانشگاه فرهنگیان، تهران، ایران

چکیده

Pragmatism in educational management emphasizes the practical effectiveness of beliefs and theories. Drawing on Dewey and James, this article examines the theoretical foundations and applications of pragmatism in educational administration. From this view, the value of any idea depends on its practical consequences, and truth is not fixed or absolute but constructed through experience and interaction with the environment. Pragmatic educational management offers key benefits: it moves managers beyond a merely administrative role to become facilitators, learning leaders, and agents of change, and transforms schools into learning organizations where teachers and students achieve continuous improvement through interaction, reflection, and practical experimentation. However, it also has limitations: relativism in ethical and religious values, lack of fixed criteria and excessive variability in decisions, strong dependence on managers' abilities, difficulty evaluating long-term educational outcomes such as morality and responsibility, and the risk of short-term objectives overshadowing long-term, quality-oriented goals. The article concludes that despite its high effectiveness in addressing real and dynamic challenges in educational systems, successful implementation requires managers with strong analytical, leadership, and communication skills, and must be accompanied by a critical perspective and attention to ethical and long-term concerns to avoid the traps of relativism and short-term decision-making.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Advantages and Disadvantages of the Pragmatist Approach to Educational Management

نویسنده [English]

  • Sohrab Yazdani
Assistant proffesor of Educational Administration Department, Farhangian University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

Pragmatism in educational management emphasizes the practical effectiveness of beliefs and theories. Drawing on Dewey and James, this article examines the theoretical foundations and applications of pragmatism in educational administration. From this view, the value of any idea depends on its practical consequences, and truth is not fixed or absolute but constructed through experience and interaction with the environment. Pragmatic educational management offers key benefits: it moves managers beyond a merely administrative role to become facilitators, learning leaders, and agents of change, and transforms schools into learning organizations where teachers and students achieve continuous improvement through interaction, reflection, and practical experimentation. However, it also has limitations: relativism in ethical and religious values, lack of fixed criteria and excessive variability in decisions, strong dependence on managers' abilities, difficulty evaluating long-term educational outcomes such as morality and responsibility, and the risk of short-term objectives overshadowing long-term, quality-oriented goals. The article concludes that despite its high effectiveness in addressing real and dynamic challenges in educational systems, successful implementation requires managers with strong analytical, leadership, and communication skills, and must be accompanied by a critical perspective and attention to ethical and long-term concerns to avoid the traps of relativism and short-term decision-making.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Pragmatic Approach
  • Educational Management
  • Flexibility
  • Decision-Making

مراجع

Asghari, M. (2022). Contemporary Western philosophies: From Husserl to Rorty (2nd ed.). Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies Publications. (Original work published in Persian)
Berkat, Setinawati, & Basrowi. (2025). The role of educational management in enhancing innovation and problem-solving competencies for students towards global competitiveness: A literature review. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 11, 101280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101280
Biesta, G. J. J., & Burbules, N. C. (2003). Pragmatism and educational research. Bloomsbury Academic.
Bush, T. (2020). Theories of educational leadership and management (5th ed.). Sage.
Dai, R., Thomas, M.K.E. & Rawolle, S. The roles of AI and educational leaders in AI-assisted administrative decision-making: a proposed framework for symbiotic collaboration. Aust. Educ. Res. 52, 1471–1487 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-024-00771-8
Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and Education. New York: Macmillan.
Dewey, J. (1938/1997). Experience and Education. New York: Touchstone.
Dewey, J. (2008). The Middle Works of John Dewey, vol. 9, 1899-1924: Democracy and Education 1916, vol. 9; Editor Jo Ann Boydston, (Sunny Press).
Fullan, M. (2020). Leading in a Culture of Change (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Gutek, G. L. (2014). Philosophical, ideological, and theoretical perspectives on education (2nd ed.). Pearson.
Robinson, M. A., & Leigh, J. S. A. (2025). Peeling the (experiential) onion: A review of the interconnected layers of research on experiential learning in Management Learning between 2010 and 2024. Management Learning, https://doi.org/10.1177/13505076241279068
Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (2005). Educational Administration, Theory, Research and Practice (7th Edition). McGraw-Hill. School Leadership & Management, 32, 453-471.
James, W. (1907). Pragmatism: A new name for some old ways of thinking. Floating Press.
James, W. (1975). Pragmatism. Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1907). https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674251977
Kien, P. T., & Dung, B. X. (2026). “William James’s pragmatism in education, from experiential learning to global application”. Cogent Education, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2026.2658224
Leonard, S. N., Fowler, S., Kennedy, J., & Devis, D. (2025). Pragmatic adaptive leadership: Tools for guiding in complex educational systems. Policy Pres
Mohajel, N (2025). Nel Noddings' Philosophical Analysis of the Relationship between Democracy and Education. The Quarterly Journal of Western Philosophy. Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 123-140. https://doi.org/10.30479/wp.2025.22157.1172
Ornstein, A. C., & Hunkins, F. P. (2018). Curriculum: Foundations, principles, and issues (7th ed.). Pearson.
Sergiovanni, T. J. (2015). The principalship: A reflective practice perspective (7th ed.). Pearson.
Yazdani., S., Ahmadiasl, F. & Nourmohammadi, O. (2026). Developing Virtue-Based Education in School: identifying prominent affecting factors. Journal of Philosophical Investigations, 19(53), 627-654. https://doi.org/10.22034/jpiut.2026.69743.4273
ارسال نظر در مورد این مقاله
CAPTCHA Image
مجله پژوهش های فلسفی
دوره 20، شماره 56 - شماره پیاپی 56
مقالات
شماره 56 پاییز 14005
مهر 1405
صفحه 711-722

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار