The Distinction Between Existence and Essence and the Issue of the Independence of Science from Theology Based on Avicenna's Rationalist Metaphysical System

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی- پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دکتری فلسفه، دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، ایران.

2 استادیار گروه فلسفه، دانشگاه کردستان، سنندج، ایران.

چکیده

In Avicenna’s era, intellectually and culturally, science was subsumed under theology, and particular sciences were conceived as secondary/subsidiary to theology and religion. The author's primary question is how Avicenna confronted this challenge and what solution he proposed to rescue particular sciences from the dominance of theology. As a prominent philosopher and metaphysician, Avicenna identified the fundamental cause of science's subordination to theology in the attribution of the laws of nature to divine will and habit. To resolve this crisis, Avicenna distinguished existence from essence, thereby freeing the laws of nature from direct reliance on divine will and grounding particular sciences within the autonomous realm of essence. Consequently, he governed particular sciences by the logic of the world of independent essences. By situating particular sciences within the realm of essence, these sciences became systematized through the necessity and universality inherent in this domain, ultimately transforming into calculable and predictable elements. Finally, despite the methodological independence of particular sciences, their epistemological principles and presuppositions are referred back to philosophy, ensuring that the fundamental link between philosophical thought and the epistemic structure of the sciences is preserved at a foundational, non-theological level. This article has been written using a descriptive-analytical method.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Distinction Between Existence and Essence and the Issue of the Independence of Science from Theology Based on Avicenna's Rationalist Metaphysical System

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mostafa Abedi Jigheh 1
  • Mohsen Bagherzadeh-Meshkibaf 2
1 PhD in Philosophy, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran
2 Assistant Professor of Philosophy Department, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran
چکیده [English]

In Avicenna’s era, intellectually and culturally, science was subsumed under theology, and particular sciences were conceived as secondary/subsidiary to theology and religion. The author's primary question is how Avicenna confronted this challenge and what solution he proposed to rescue particular sciences from the dominance of theology. As a prominent philosopher and metaphysician, Avicenna identified the fundamental cause of science's subordination to theology in the attribution of the laws of nature to divine will and habit. To resolve this crisis, Avicenna distinguished existence from essence, thereby freeing the laws of nature from direct reliance on divine will and grounding particular sciences within the autonomous realm of essence. Consequently, he governed particular sciences by the logic of the world of independent essences. By situating particular sciences within the realm of essence, these sciences became systematized through the necessity and universality inherent in this domain, ultimately transforming into calculable and predictable elements. Finally, despite the methodological independence of particular sciences, their epistemological principles and presuppositions are referred back to philosophy, ensuring that the fundamental link between philosophical thought and the epistemic structure of the sciences is preserved at a foundational, non-theological level. This article has been written using a descriptive-analytical method.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Existence
  • Essence
  • Science
  • Theology
  • Calculability
  • Philosophy

مراجع

Al-Razi, F. D. (1984). Sharḥ al-Ishārāt wa al-Tanbīhāt (Vol. 2). Mar'ashi Najafi Publications.
Al-Tusi, N. D. (1976). Asās al-Iqtibās (M. Modarres Razavi, Ed.; 2nd ed.). University of Tehran Press.
Al-Tusi, N. D. (2004). Al-Ishārāt wa al-Tanbīhāt (Vols. 1–2). Al-Balaghas Press.
Aristotle. (2006). The complete works of Aristotle (J. Barnes, Ed. & Trans.). Princeton University Press.
Ashtiani, S. J. D. (1999). Selections from the works of divine philosophers of Iran (Vol. 2). Islamic Propagation Office of Qom Seminary.
Avicenna, H. A. (1947). Tisʿ Rasāʾil fī al-Ḥikmah wa al-Ṭabīʿiyyāt. Dar al-Arab.
Avicenna, H. A. (1984). Al-Taʿlīqāt (A. Badawi, Ed.). Maktabat al-ʿĀlam al-Islāmī.
Avicenna, H. A. (2008). Al-Najāt min al-Gharq fī Baḥr al-Ḍalālāt (M. T. Danesh-Pazhouh, Ed.). University of Tehran Press.
Avicenna, H. A. (2009a). Al-Ilāhiyyāt (Vol. 1; I. B. Madkour, Ed.). Dhawi al-Qurba Publishing.
Avicenna, H. A. (2009b). Al-Burhān (Vol. 9; I. B. Madkour, Ed.). Dhawi al-Qurba Publishing.
Avicenna. (1994). Burhān of Al-Shifāʾ (M. Qavam-Safari, Trans.). Fikr-e Rooz Publishing.
Avicenna. (2002). Al-Ishārāt wa al-Tanbīhāt (M. Zarei, Ed.). Boustan-e Ketab.
Avicenna. (n.d.). Al-Rasāʾil fī al-Ḥikmah wa al-Ṭabīʿiyyāt. Dar al-Arab.
Dinani, G. I. (2001). General philosophical rules in Islamic philosophy (Vol. 1). Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies.
Fakhr al-Din al-Razi. (1984). Sharḥ al-Ishārāt wa al-Tanbīhāt. Mar'ashi Najafi Publications.
Halabi, A. A. (1994). History of theology in Iran and the Islamic world. Asatir Publishing.
Hasanzadeh Amoli, H. (2008). Persian commentary on Al-Asfār al-Arbaʿah (Vol. 3). Boustan-e Ketab.
Inwood, B. (2022). Later Stoicism 155 BC to AD 200: An introduction and collection of sources in translation. Cambridge University Press.
ارسال نظر در مورد این مقاله
CAPTCHA Image
مجله پژوهش های فلسفی
دوره 20، شماره 56 - شماره پیاپی 56
مقالات
شماره 56 پاییز 1405
مهر 1405
صفحه 799-816

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار