- Alexander, Joshua (2012). Experimental Philosophy: An Introduction. Cambridge: Polity.
- Alexander, Joshua, and Weinberg, Johnathan (2007). “Analytic Epistemology and Experimental Philosophy.” Philosophy Compass 2: 56-80.
- Alexander, Joshua, Mallon, Ron, and Weinberg, Johnathan (2010). “Accentuate the Negative.” Review of Philosophy and Psychology 1.2: 297-314.
- Bealer, George (1992). “The Incoherence of Empiricism.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 66: 99-138.
- Bealer, George (1998). “Intuition and the Autonomy of Philosophy.” In M. DePaul and W. Ramsey (eds.), Rethinking Intuition: The Psychology of Intuition and Its Role in Philosophical Inquiry. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield: 201-240.
- Bengson, John (2013). “Experimental Attacks on Intuitions and Answers.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 86.3 (2013): 495-532.
- Boghossian, Paul (2001). “Inference and Insight” (review of BonJour, In Defense of Pure Reason). Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63.3 (2001): 633-640.
- BonJour, Laurence (1998). In Defense of Pure Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- BonJour, Laurence (2005). “In Defense of the a Priori.” In Matthias Steup and Ernest Sosa (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Epistemology. Oxford: Blackwell: 98-105.
- Brown, Jessica (2011). “Thought Experiments, Intuitions and Philosophical Evidence.” Dialectica 65.4: 493-516.
- Buckwalter, Wesley and Stich, Stephen (2014). “Gender and Philosophical Intuition.” In Joshua Knobe and Shaun Nicols (eds.), Experimental Philosophy, Vol. 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 307-346.
- Burge, Tyler (1993). “Content Preservation.” The Philosophical Review 102: 457-488.
- Burge, Tyler (2003). “Perceptual Entitlement.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67.3: 503-548.
- Cappelen, Herman (2012). Philosophy without Intuitions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Casullo, Alberto (2003). A Priori Justification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Chapman, Andrew and Addison Ellis, Robert Hanna, Tyler Hildebrand and Henry Pickford (2013). In Defense of Intuitions. A New Rationalist Manifesto. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Chisholm, Roderick (1989). Theory of Knowledge. 3rd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentince-Hall.
- Chudnoff, Elijah (2011a). “The Nature of Intuitive Justification.” Philosophical Studies 153: 313-333.
- Chudnoff, Elijah (2011b). “What Intuitions are Like.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 82.3: 625-654.
- Cullison, Andrew (2013). “Seemings and Semantics.” In Chris Tucker (ed.), Seemings and Jusification: New Essays on Dogmatism and Phenomenal Conservativism. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 33-51.
- Cummins, Robert (1998). “Reflection on Reflective Equilibrium.” In M. DePaul and W. Ramsey (eds.), Rethinking Intuition: The Psychology of Intuition and Its Role in Philosophical Inquiry. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield: 113-128.
- Enoch, David, and Schechter, Joshua (2008). “How are Belief-Forming Methods Justified?”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 76/3: 547-579.
- Geach, Peter (1957). Mental Acts. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
- Goldman, Alvin (2007). “Philosophical Intuitions: Their Target, Their Source and Their Epistemic Status.” Grazer Philosophische Studien 74: 1-26.
- Goldman, Alvin (2010). “Philosophical Naturalism and Intuitional Methodology.” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Association 84.2 (Nov. 2010): 114-150.
- Goldman, Alvin, and Pust, Joel (1998). “Philosophical Theory and Intuitional Evidence.” In M. DePaul and W. Ramsey (eds.), Rethinking Intuition: The Psychology of Intuition and Its Role in Philosophical Inquiry. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield: 179-200.
- Hanna, Robert (2001). Kant and the Foundations of Analytic Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Huemer, Michael (2001). Skepticism and the Veil of Perception. New York: Rowman & Littlefield
- Huemer, Michael (2007). “Compassionate Phenomenal Conservatism.” Philosophy and
- Phenomenological Research 74: 30-55.
- Huemer, Michael (2013). “Phenomenal Conservatism Über Alles.” In Chris Tucker (ed.), Seemings and
- Justification. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013: 328-350.
- Ichikawa, Jonathan (2013). “Experimental Philosophy and Apriority.” In Albert Casullo
- And Joshua C. Thurow (eds.), The A Priori in Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University
- Press: 45-66.
- Kahneman, Daniel, Slovic, Paul, and Tversky, Amos (1982). Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Kant, Immanuel (1997). Critique of Pure Reason. Translated by Paul Guyer and Allen Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Kern, Andrea (2012). ”Knowledge as a Fallible Capacity.” In Stefan Tolksdorf (ed.). Conceptions of Knowledge. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter: 215-241.
- Knobe, Joshua (2003). “Intentional Action and Side Effects in Ordinary Language.” Analysis 63: 190-193.
- Knobe, Joshua and Shaun Nichols (2017). “Experimental Philosophy.” In Edward N. Zalta, ed., The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/experimental-philosophy/.
- Ludwig, Kirk (2007). “The Epistemology of Thought Experiments: First Person versus Third Person Approaches.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 31: 128-159.
- Ludwig, Kirk (2010). “Intuitions and Relativity.” Philosophical Psychology 23: 427-445.
- Lynch, Michael P. (2006). “Trusting Intuitions.” In Patrick Greenough and Michael P. Lynch (eds.), Truth and Realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 227-238.
- Machery, E., Mallon, R., Nichols, S., and Stich, S. (2005). “Semantics, Cross-Cultural Style.” Cognition 92: B1-B12.
- McDowell, John (2009a). “Evans’s Frege.” In The Engaged Intellect: Philosophical Essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press: 163-185.
- McDowell, John (2009b). “The Disjunctive Conception of Experience as Material for a Transcendental Argument.” In The Engaged Intellect: Philosophical Essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press: 225-240.
- McDowell, John (2010). “Tyler Burge on Disjunctivism.” Philosophical Explorations 13.3: 243-255.
- McDowell, John (2011). Perception as a Capacity for Knowledge. Milwaukee: Marquette University Press.
- McGee, Vernon (1985). “A Counterexample to Modus Ponens.” Journal of Philosophy 82: 462-471.
- Nichols, Shaun and Knobe, Joshua (2007). “Moral Responsibility and Determinism: the Cognitive Science of Folk Intuitions.” Noûs 41: 663-685.
- Peacocke, Christopher (1992). A Study of Concepts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Plantinga, Alvin (1993). Warrant and Proper Function. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Pryor, James (2000). “The Skeptic and the Dogmatist.” Noûs 34.4: 517-549.
- Pryor, James (2005). “Is there Immediate Justification?” In Matthias Steup and Ernest Sosa (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Epistemology. Oxford: Blackwell: 181-202.
- Pust, Joel (2000). Intuitions as Evidence. New York: Garland Publishing.
- Sellars, Wilfrid (1997). Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Sosa, Ernest (2006). “Intuitions and Truth.” In Patrick Greenough and Michael P. Lynch (eds.), Truth and Realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 208-226.
- Sosa, Ernest (2007a). “Intuitions: Their Nature and Epistemic Efficacy.” Grazer Philosophische Studien 74: 51-67.
- Sosa, Ernest (2007b). A Virtue Epistemology. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Sosa, Ernest (2013). “Intuitions and Foundations.” In Albert Casullo and Joshua C. Thurow (eds.), The A Priori in Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 186-203.
- Stich, Stephen and Buckwalter, Wesley (2011). “Gender and the Philosophy Club.” The Philosopher’s Magazine 52: 60-65.
- Swain, S., Alexander, J. and Weinberg, J.M. (2008). “The Instability of Philosophical Intuitions: Running Hot and Cold on Truetemp.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 76.1: 138-55.
- Tucker, Chris (2013). “Seemings and Justification: An Introduction.” In Chris Tucker (ed.), Seemings and Justification: New Essays on Dogmatism and Phenomenal Conservatism. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 1-29.
- Weatherson, Brian (2003). “What Good are Counterexamples?” Philosophical Studies 115 (2003): 1-31.
- Weinberg, Jonathan (2007). “How to Challenge Intuitions Empirically Without Risking Skepticism,” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 31.1: 318-343.
- Weinberg, Jonathan (2013). “The Prospects for an Experimentalist Rationalism, or Why It’s OK if the A Priori Is Only 99.44 Percent Empirically Pure.” In Albert Casullo and Joshua C. Thurow (eds.), The A Priori in Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 92-108.
- Weinberg, Jonathan, Nichols, Shaun, and Stich, Stephen (2001). “Normativity and Epistemic Intuitions.” Philosophical Topics 29: 429-60.
- White, Roger (2006). “Problems for Dogmatism.” Philosophical Studies 131: 525-557.
- Williamson, Timothy (2007). The Philosophy of Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell.
- Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1969). On Certainty. Translated and edited by G.E.M. Anscombe and G.H. von Wright. Oxford: Blackwell.
- Wright, Crispin (2004a). “On Epistemic Entitlement: Warrant for Nothing (and Foundations for Free?)”. Aristotelian Society, suppl. vol. 79: 168-211.
- Wright, Crispin (2004b). “Intuition, Entitlement and the Epistemology of Logical Laws.” Dialectica 58: 155–175.
- Zagzebski, Linda (2013). “Powers and Reasons.” In Ruth Groff and John Greco (eds.), Powers and Capacities in Philosophy: The New Aristotelianism. New York: Routledge: 270-281.
- Zamzow, J. and Nichols, S. (2009). “Variations in Ethical Intuitions.” Philosophical Issues 19: 368-388.
ارسال نظر در مورد این مقاله