Journal of Philosophical Investigations
Karl Popper in Africa: Liberal-Communitarianism as Ideology for Democratic Social Reconstruction
Karl Popper in Africa: Liberal-Communitarianism as Ideology for Democratic Social Reconstruction

Oseni Taiwo Afisi

دوره 17، شماره 42 ، خرداد 1402، ، صفحه 1-12

https://doi.org/10.22034/jpiut.2000.16561

چکیده
  This paper examines the liberal society that Popper lauds, that aims to be truly open, and discusses why another, more communitarian kind of society, particularly societies in Africa, may also reflect the quest for intellectual openness that is Popper’s ideal. Moreover, this paper avers reasons why Popper should be comfortable with such a liberal-communitarian ...  بیشتر
Popper in Greece
Popper in Greece

Georgios Archontas

دوره 17، شماره 42 ، خرداد 1402، ، صفحه 13-22

https://doi.org/10.22034/jpiut.2000.16563

چکیده
  Notwithstanding Karl Popper’s deep admiration for ancient Greece and his affection for modern Greece, his work has been mostly viewed with caution by Greek scholars who, until relatively recently, often chose to either ignore or downplay it. This stance can be partially attributed to the novel approach of Popper’s critique to Plato which did not fare ...  بیشتر
Applying Critical Rationalism to Liberal Capitalism
Applying Critical Rationalism to Liberal Capitalism

Raphael Sassower

دوره 17، شماره 42 ، خرداد 1402، ، صفحه 225-241

https://doi.org/10.22034/jpiut.2023.16585

چکیده
  Since Critical Rationalism is considered by some more of an attitude or mindset and by others a methodological approach to philosophical thinking and practical problem-solving, its application, or more accurately, its epistemological testing grounds, should be expected to be much more wide-ranging than they have been so far. With the exception of some published ...  بیشتر
Logical Content and Its Malcontents
Logical Content and Its Malcontents

David Miller

دوره 17، شماره 42 ، خرداد 1402، ، صفحه 281-297

https://doi.org/10.22034/jpiut.2023.16588

چکیده
  The doctrine that the content of the conclusion of a deductively valid argument is included in the content of its premises, taken jointly, is a familiar one. It has important consequences for the question of what value valid arguments possess, since it indicates the poverty of three traditional answers: that arguments may and should be used as instruments of ...  بیشتر
Is Falsifiability a ‘Blunt Instrument’ for Modern Physics?
Is Falsifiability a ‘Blunt Instrument’ for Modern Physics?

Manjari Chakrabarty

دوره 17، شماره 42 ، خرداد 1402، ، صفحه 298-316

https://doi.org/10.22034/jpiut.2023.16589

چکیده
  Modern (theoretical) physics seems to be in deep crisis today as many of its core aspects are not empirically well-confirmed. Heated exchanges among physicists on the scientific status of physical theories with little or, at best, a tenuous connection to possible experimental tests is highly visible in the popular scientific literature. Some physicists (e.g., ...  بیشتر
Personal or Impersonal Knowledge?
Personal or Impersonal Knowledge?

Susan Haack

دوره 13، شماره 28 ، آبان 1398، ، صفحه 21-44

https://doi.org/10.22034/jpiut.2019.35720.2399

چکیده
  Reflections on the contrast between the titles of Popper’s Objective Knowledge and Polanyi’s Personal Knowledge led Haack to explore how Polanyi’s ideas might be used to correct some of the distortions caused by Popper’s refusal to allow any role in epistemology to the knowing subject, and thus to throw light on such questions as the relations ...  بیشتر