Journal of Philosophical Investigations

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی- پژوهشی

نویسنده

استادیار پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی، ایران. تهران.

چکیده

این نوشتار به بررسی ظرفیت نظریه­های فلسفه سیاسی معاصر در مواجهه با ویروس کووید-19‌ می‌پردازد. جهت انجام این مهم نویسنده به پیشهاد طبقه بندی ویژه‌‌ای برای فهم تنوع حاکم بر منطق اقدام و عمل در حوزه عمومی بر اساس نظریه­های فلسفه سیاسی همت می‌گمارد و سپس، از منظر آگاهی ناشی از این طبقه‌بندی مفهوم پردازانه، سطوح مختلف درک موقعیت به لحاظ فلسفی را در مواجهه با این ویروس همه‌‌گیر به بحث می‌گذارد. بر این اساس چهار گروه نظریه‌پردازی عدالت- محور، سنت- محور، نتیجه-محور و آزادی-محور معرفی می‌گردد. نوشتار می‌کوشد، در تلاشی ابتدائا معرفت‌شناسانه و سپس ظرفیت‌سنجانه بر پایه نظام هنجاری ناشی از هر یک از نظریه­های فلسفه سیاسی، امکان­های پیش روی این دیسیپلین­های نظری را جهت فهم موقعیت همه‌‌گیری ویروس کرونا و سپس مواجهه با آن توضیح دهد. مقاله قادر به شناسایی طیفی از امکان­ها، بر اساس رویکردی انتقادی و تحلیلی، می‌گردد. فرضیه پژوهش آن است که به میزانی که نظریات فلسفه سیاسی از سمت معرفت‌شناسی کل نگر متعین پیرامون عدالت‌گرایی به سمت معرفت‌شناسی جزءنگر نامتعین پیرامون آزادی‌گرایی تغییر موقعیت می‌یابند، استعداد سیاست‌گذاری کنترل پایه و محدودیت‌گرا در جامعه کاهش می‌یابد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Political Philosophy and Dealing with the Coronavirus Dealing with the Epidemic of Covid-19 from the Perspective of Contemporary Political Philosophy

نویسنده [English]

  • Abdolamjeed Moballeghi

Assistant professor in Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies, Iran. Tehran.

چکیده [English]

This paper examines the capacity of contemporary political philosophy theories in dealing with the Coronavirus disease (Covid-19). It proposes a special categorization which helps to classify the meaning and understand the diversity of action and practice in the public sphere based on theories of political philosophy.
Based on this, four groups of meta-theories are identified: justice-oriented, tradition-oriented, result-oriented and freedom-oriented. In the next step, the paper identified the most important and better known theories within each of these meta-theories. In an attempt, based on a normative explanation of each of the theories of political philosophy, the theoretical capacity of political philosophy to understand the epidemic situation of the Coronavirus (Covid-19) and then to face it is studied. The research hypothesis is that to the extent that theories of political philosophy shift from justice-oriented holistic epistemology to Freedom-oriented non-holistic epistemology, their inclination toward controlling state management, such as social distancing, diminishes. 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Political Philosophy
  • Covid 19
  • Coronavirus
  • Justice
  • Freedom
  • Social Distancing
-       Abbasi, Ebrahim (2015) Communitarianism as a Method of Analysis: An Effort for Localization in Social Sciences, Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities, Volume 7, Issue 2, Spring 2015, Page 23-56.
-       Adelson,‌ Howard L. (1995) “The Origins of a Concept of Social Justice” in Social Justice in the Ancient World, ed. K. D. Irani and Morris Silver, Westport: Greenwood Publishing Group,.
-       Afolabi, Michael Olusegun (2018) “Public Health Disasters: A Global Ethical Framework”, Pittsburgh: Springer.
-       Alavudeen, A.; Rahman, R. Kalil; Jayakumaran, M. (2008) “Professional Ethics and Human Values”, New Delhi: Laxmi Publications.
-       Almgren, Gunnar (2006) “Health Care Politics, Policy, and Services: A Social Justice Analysis”, New York: Springer Publishing Company.
-       Ashford, Nigel; Davies, Stephen (2012) “A Dictionary of Conservative and Libertarian Thought (Routledge Revivals)”, New York: Routledge.
-       Audard, Catherine (2014), “John Rawls”, New York: Routledge.
-       Barzilai, Gad (2010) “Communities and Law: Politics and Cultures of Legal Identities”, Michigan: University of Michigan Press.
-       Battin, M. Pabst; Francis, Leslie P.; Jacobson, Jay A.; Smith, Charles B. (2009) “The Patient as Victim and Vector: Ethics and Infectious Disease”, New York: Oxford University Press.
-       Bazelon, Emily (2020) “Restarting America Means People Will Die. So /When Do We Do It?” in: The New York Times Magazine (online), Accessed at 12/07/2020, https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/10/magazine/coronavirus-economy-debate. html
-       Birks, Thomas Rawson (1874) “Modern Utilitarianism, Macmillan and Company”, London: Macmillan and Co.
-       Bjørkdahl, Kristian; Carlsen, Benedicte (2018) “Introduction: Pandemics, Publics,and Politics—Staging Responses to Public Health Crises”, Singapore: Palgrave Pivot.
-       Crosby, Alfred W. (2003) America's Forgotten Pandemic: The Influenza of 1918, New York: Cambridge University Press.
-       Doherty, Peter C. (2013) “Pandemics: What Everyone Needs to Know”, New York: Oxford University Press.
-       Faessel, Victor (2018) “The Oxford Handbook of Global Studies”, London: Oxford University Press.
-       Fishman, Dan (2020) “Libertarian Press Release on COVID-19” (online), accessed: 06/06/2020, https://www.lp.org/libertarian-press-release-on-covid-19/
-       Fleming, Mary Louise; Parker, Elizabeth (2012) “Introduction to Public Health”, 2nd edition, Chatswood, New South Wales: Churchill Livingstone/​Elsevier.
-       Folland, Sherman; Charles Goodman, Allen; Stano, Miron (2016) “The Economics of Health and Health Care: Pearson New International Edition”, New York: Routledge.
-       Gaus, Gerald (2004) “Chandran Kukathas”, Handbook of Political Theory, London: SAGE, 2004.
-       Gerstman, B. Burt (2003) “Epidemiology Kept Simple: An Introduction to Traditional and Modern Epidemiology”, 2d Ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
-       Ghaderi, Zakaria (2012) “The Criticism of Philosophical Discourse of Modernity: Subject, Truth and Power in Michel Foucault’s Thought”, Journal of occidentstudy, Volume 2, Issue 2, Winter and Spring 2012,page 127-179 {in Persian}.
-       Haghighat, Sadegh S. (2019) Methodology of Political Science, Qom: Mofid University Press {in Persian}.
-       Hanewicz, Wayne B. (2011) “Pandemic” in Encyclopedia of Global Justice: A – I, Deen K. Chatterjee, London: Springer.
-       Heywood, Andrew, Politics (2010) Trans. Abd o alrahman e Alem, Tehran: Ney Publication {in Persian}.
-       Horton, John (2007) “Selfhood, Community and Democracy”, in Liberal Democracy and Its Critics, April Carter; Geoffrey Stokes, Tehran: Allameh Tabatab i University {in Persian}.
-       Kymlicka, Will (2017)‌ Contemporary Political Philosophy, Trans. Meisam Badamhi; Mohammad Mobasheri, Tehran: negah e moaser Publication {in Persian}.
-       Lal, Prerna (2006) “A Critique of the Social Contract - Hegel, Marx and Foucault” (online). Accessed at 23/06/2020, https://ssrn.com/abstract=2217846 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2217846
-       Larson, Heidi (2020) “Stuck: How Vaccine Rumors Start -- and Why They Don't Go Away”, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-       Lundy, Karen Saucier; Sharyn, Janes (2016) “Community Health Nursing: Caring for the Public's Health”, Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
-       McCann, Gerard; Ó hAdhmaill, Felim (2020) “International Human Rights, Social Policy & Global Development: Critical Perspectives”, Bristol; Chicago, IL: Policy Press.
-       Mishra, Sitakanta (2020) “The Post-Pandemic World Order: Nine Pointers”, New York: IndraStra Global.
-       Mulgan, Tim (2014) “Understanding Utilitarianism”, London and New York: Routledge.
-       Murray, Dale F. (2007) “Nozick, Autonomy and Compensation, London, New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.
-       Naidoo, Jennie; Wills, Jane (2009) “Foundations for Health Promotion”, Edinburgh: Baillière Tindall.
-       Nozick, Robert (1974) “Anarchy, State, and Utopia”, New York: Basic Books.
-       Nozick, Robert (1990) “Examined Life: Philosophical Meditations”, New York: Simon & Schuster.
-       Rawls, John (1971) “A Theory of Justice”, Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
-       Reiff, Mark R. (2020) “In the Name of Liberty: The Argument for Universal Unionization”, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
-       Sagi, Avi (2008) “Tradition vs. Traditionalism”, Amsterdam: BRILL/Rodopi.
-       Schmidtz, David (2011) “The Right to Distribute in The Cambridge Companion to Nozick's Anarchy, State, and Utopia, Ed. Ralf M. Bader, John Meadowcroft, New York: Cambridge University Press.
-       Shelby, Will, j.; Dietz, Eric; R. Black, David (2012) “Classic Military War Principles Applied to Pandemic Preparation” in Pandemic Planning, j. Eric Dietz and David R. Black, New York: CRC Press.
-       Snowden, Frank (2019) “Epidemics and Society: From the Black Death to the Present”, New Haven CT: Yale University Press.
-       Stott, Clifford; West, Owen; Harrison, Mark, (2020) “A Turning Point, Securitization, and Policing in the Context of Covid-19: Building a New Social Contract Between State and Nation?” Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice.
-       Taylor, Steven (2019) “The Psychology of Pandemics: Preparing for the Next Global Outbreak of Infectious Disease”, Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
-       Walgrave, Lode (2002) “Restorative Justice and the Law: socio-ethical and juridical foundations for a systemic approach” in Restorative Justice and the Law, Lode Walgrave (Ed.), Devon, UK: Willan Publishing.
-       Weithman, Paul J. (1999) “Moral Psychology and Community, in Philosophy of Rawls, Volume 4, New York: Garland Publishing.
-       World Health Organization (1984) “Health promotion: a discussion document on the concept and principles” (online), Accessed at 23/06/2020, https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/107835/1/E90607.pdf
CAPTCHA Image