Journal of Philosophical Investigations

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی- پژوهشی

نویسنده

استادیار گروه معارف دانشگاه علوم پزشکی نیشابور. ایران

10.22034/jpiut.2020.41079.2639

چکیده

Philosophers consider sense as a means for true cognition. In spite of the fact that Islamic philosophy are generally regarded as rational philosophy, it does not mean that they do not assume epistemological value for sense. To some of them, including Ibn Sina, sense is extremely important. In the present article, I argue that the role of sense in Ibn Sina's epistemological system is very significant although the I would not consider Ibn Sina  as an empiricist in the sense that Hume is in the Western philosophy. Rather, I consider Ibn Sina empiricism similar to  the theory of Locke. It is due to the fact that Ibn Sina considers the human mind as a tabula rasa with no actual data at the birth. It is believed that with sense the knowledge begins. In addition, in this study, by taking into the account of both empirical and rational criteria (in Ibn Sina's epistemological system), it is ultimately accentuated that in the most cases, Ibn Sina's tendency is found to be more toward empiricism. In another part of the paper, the role of sense in the realm of the concepts and affirmation (sensory and rational) is explained. It is concluded that sensory conceptions are the outcomes of sense. Other ideas (concepts) are mediated by sense; sensory affirmations immediately come from sense and in rational affirmations, sense plays a role as an introduction. In sum, this is the explanation of Ibn Sina's statement: "Whoever has no sense will have no knowledge"

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Position of Sense in Ibn Sina's Epistemology (The Empiricism of Avicenna)

نویسنده [English]

  • Mostafa Momeni

Assistant Professor, Neyshabur University of Medical Sciences, Neyshabur, Iran.

چکیده [English]

Philosophers consider sense as a means for true cognition. In spite of the fact that Islamic philosophy are generally regarded as rational philosophy, it does not mean that they do not assume epistemological value for sense. To some of them, including Ibn Sina, sense is extremely important. In the present article, I argue that the role of sense in Ibn Sina's epistemological system is very significant although the I would not consider Ibn Sina  as an empiricist in the sense that Hume is in the Western philosophy. Rather, I consider Ibn Sina empiricism similar to  the theory of Locke. It is due to the fact that Ibn Sina considers the human mind as a tabula rasa with no actual data at the birth. It is believed that with sense the knowledge begins. In addition, in this study, by taking into the account of both empirical and rational criteria (in Ibn Sina's epistemological system), it is ultimately accentuated that in the most cases, Ibn Sina's tendency is found to be more toward empiricism. In another part of the paper, the role of sense in the realm of the concepts and affirmation (sensory and rational) is explained. It is concluded that sensory conceptions are the outcomes of sense. Other ideas (concepts) are mediated by sense; sensory affirmations immediately come from sense and in rational affirmations, sense plays a role as an introduction. In sum, this is the explanation of Ibn Sina's statement: "Whoever has no sense will have no knowledge"

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • affirmations
  • Avicenna or Ibn Sina
  • empiricism
  • concepts
  • knowledge
  • sense
  • sense perception
  • Ajdukiewicz Kazimierz(2536), Problems and Theories of Philosophy, by Bozorgmehr Manuchehr, e.d. by Mahdavi Yahya, Tehran: Daneshgah e- Sanati Aryamehr, ( in Persian)
  • Al-Farabi (1405), Al-Jam‘ bayn Ra’y al-Hakimayn, Introduction and Comments by Al-Bair Nasri Nader, Tehran: Al-Zahra(in Persian)
  • Al-Farabi(14080), al- Manteqiyyat lel- Farabi, ed. by M.T. Dānešpažūh, Qom: Ayatollah Mar‘ashi Najafi Library Publications
  • Bahmanyar(1375 ), At-TAhsil, ed. By Morteza Motahhari, Tehran: Entesharat e- Daneshgah e –Tehran (in Persian)
  • Bozorgmehr, Manuchehr(1398/1978), Filsofan e- tajrobi e- Englestan(England empiricist philosophers), Tehran: Anjoman –e Falsafah- ye Iran(in Persian)
  • Copleston Frederick(1986), A history of philosophy, Canada: Doubleday, Vol. 1,4,5, (in Persian)
  • Copleston Frederick(1360H), Kant, tr. By Bozorgmehr Manuchehr, Tehran: Entesharat-e Daneshgah -e Sharif (in Persian)
  • Faàli, M.T.( 1376H), Edrak -e Hesi Az Didgah -e Ibn Sīnā(Sense perception from Ibn Sīnā's point of view), Qom: Daftar -e Tabliqat- e Eslami(in Persian)
  • Foulquie, Paul(1347H), Metaphysique, tr. By Mahdavi , Yahya, Tehran: Entešārāt-e Dānešgāh-e Tehrān( in Persian)
  • Ibn Manzur, M.( 1414), Lisan al-‘Arab (disctionary), Beirut: Dar al-Fikr .
  • Ibn Rushd, Talkhis-e Kitab-ol Burhan, Cario: al-Hayʾaal-Misriyya
  • Ibn Sīnā(1379), Al-Isharat wa al-Tanbihat Maà Al- Sharh at- Tusi Va Sharh e- Qotb o- Din Al-RAzi, Tehran: Matbeat- ol Haydari
  • Ibn Sīnā(1956), aš-Šifāʾ, al-Mantiq, al-Burhān, ed. by Abū-l-ʿAlā ʿAfīfī. Cairo: al-Matbaʿaal-amī
  • Ibn Sīnā(1960), aš-Šifāʾ, al-Ilāhiyyāt, ed. by G.C. Anawatī and S. Zāyid. Cairo: al-Matbaʿa-ol amī
  • Ibn Sīnā(1400), Rasa’il Ibn Sīnā (Avicenna’s Treatises), Qom: Bidar Publications
  • Ibn Sīnā(1404), At-Taʿlīqāt, by ʿAbdurrahmān Badawī. Cairo: al-Hayʾaal-Misriyya al-ʿāmmali-l-kitāb
  • Ibn Sīnā(1404), Al-Shifa, Al- Mantiq, ed. S. Zāyid, Cairo: al-Matbaʿa al-amīriyya
  • Ibn Sīnā(1405), Al Matiq- ol Mashreghiyeen, Qom: Ayatollah Mar‘ashi Najafi Library Publications.
  • Ibn Sīnā(1375H), An- Nafs men Kitab-o Šifāʾ, ed. By H. H. Amoli, Qom: Daftar –e Tablighat- e Islami
  • Ibn Sīnā(1376H), Al- Ilāhiyyāt, ed. By H.H. Amoli, Qom: Daftar- e Tabliqat-e Eslami,
  • Ibn Sīnā(1362H), an-Najāt, ed. by M.T. Dānešpažūh (Tehran: Entešārāt-e Dānešgāh-e Tehrān
  • Ibn Sīnā(1363H), Al-Mabda’ wa al-Ma‘ad, tahqiq ‘A. Nurani. Tehran: Mu’assasah Mutala‘at-e Islami, University of McGill.
  • Ibn Sīnā, Ahwal al-Nafs Risalah fi al-Nafs wa Baqa’iha wa Ma‘adiha wa yaliha Thalath Rasa’il fi al-Nafs li Ibn Sīnā, tahqiq Ahmad Fu’ad al-Ahwani. Paris: Dar Babylon.
  • Locke, John(1380H). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, tr. By S. Rezazadeh Shafagh, Tehran: Entešārāt-e Shfiei(in Persian)
  • Yahya(1376H), Shakkakan-e Yunan(Skeptics of Greece), Tehran: Kharazmi, (in Persian)
  • Mesbah- e Yazdi(1373H), M.T., Sharh-e Burhan- e Shifa, ed. By Mohsen Gharaviyan, Tehran: Amirkabir(in Persian)
  • Mostafavi,S.H.( 1387H), Sharh e- Namad –e Sewwum -e Esharat, Tehran: Entešārāt-e Dānešgāh-e Imam Sadiq (in Persian)
  • Paul Edwards(1972), The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, London, copyright by Macmillan, Vol. 3 , 7.
  • Randall , John Herman(1363H), Philosophy: An Introduction, Tr. by A.J. Aàlam, Tehran: Entešārāt-e Soroush( in Persian)
  • Sajjadi, S.J(1375H), Farhang-e Olum –e Falsafi va Kalami, Tehran: Amir Kabir
  • Saliba ,Jamil(1366H), Al Mojam ol- Falsafi, tr. by Sanei M., Tehran: Hekmat
  • Audi , Robert (1995)The Cambridge Dictionary of philosophy, , Cambridge university press
  • Al- Tusi, nasir o Din(1361), Isa sol EQtibas, ed. By Modarres e Razavi, Tehran: Entesharat e- Daneshgah e -Tehran
  • Witgeneshtain, L(1378H). Logical Positivism, tr. By Khorramshahi, B. Tehran: Enteshatat-e Elmi Farhangi(in Persian)

 

CAPTCHA Image