Subject of Metaphysics: A Critique of Natorp's Neo-Kantian Approach Based on Hamelin's Interpretation

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 PhD Candidate in Philosophy, Iranian Institute of Philosophy (IRIP), Tehran. Iran.

2 Associate Professor of philosophy, Iranian Institute of Philosophy (IRIP), Tehran. Iran.

3 PhD in Philosophy, Allameh Tababa’i University, Tehran. Iran.

Abstract

As it is well known, Aristotle in his Metaphysics seeks a science subsumed under different rubrics of “prime philosophy”, “wisdom”, “the study of being qua being”, and “theology”. The relation between these different titles of Metaphysics has been formulated by Paul Natorp as an insoluble paradox: the subject matter of prime philosophy cannot be both being qua being (being in general) and divine being (the supreme being) at the same time. Since Natorp, there has always been a controversy on this paradox as well as the problem of integrity of different books of Metaphysics. The purpose of this paper, therefore, is twofold. Firstly, we shall scrutinize the neo-Kantian foundation of Natorp’s interpretation of Aristotle; secondly, we shall present Octave Hamelin’s exegesis of Aristotle’s theory of being as an interpretation on the basis of which two seemingly contradictory aspects of Aristotle’s metaphysics can be reconciled, and thereby one can find an appropriate solution to this paradox. In fact, we intend to disclose the underlying assumptions lie at the bottom of Natorp’s understanding of Aristotle, and we shall indicate that Hamelin’s ontological interpretation of Metaphysics is so fertile that provides us with an appropriate measure to avoid confronting such contradictions.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

-   Al-Farabi (2008) “Maqased e metaphysic e arastoo” (Aristotle Objectives of Metaphysics) in Rasail-e Falsafiye Farabi (Farabiʼs Philosophical Essays), trans. Saeed Rahimian, Tehran: Elmi and Farhangi Publications, 57-64 {in Persian}.
-   Allison, Henry E. (1968) “Kant’s Concept of the Transcendental Object”, Kant-Studien, 59, 165-186.
-   Aristotle (1934) De l’âme, trans. Jules Tricot, Paris: Vrin, coll. Bibliothèque des textes philosophiques.
-   Aristotle (1962) La Métaphysique, trans. Jules Tricot, Paris: Vrin, coll. Bibliothèque des textes philosophiques (2 vol.).
-   Aristotle (1984) The Complete Works of Aristotle, The Revised Oxford Translation, edit. Jonathan Barnes, (Bollingen Series LXXI-2), Princeton University Press (2 vol.).
-   Aristotle (1995) Les seconds analytiques, trans. Jules Tricot, Paris: Vrin, coll. Bibliothèque des textes philosophiques.
-   Bressan, Lisa (2013) "Aristotle's Metaphysics Book K in Paul Natorp's Neokantian Perspective", Lexicon Philosophicum: International Journal for the History of Texts and Ideas: 1, 154-178.
-   Cohen, Hermann (1885) Kant's Theorie der Erfahrung, Second edition, Berlin: F. Dümmler.
-   Faramarz Ghramaleki, Ahad & Maftouni, Nadia (2007) "The Subject of Philosophy in the Thought of Aristotle, Ibn Sina and Ibn Rushd." Avicennian Philosophy, 35: 56-78 {in Persian}.
-   Grondin, Jean (2002) “The new Proximity Between Theology and Philosophy”, in Between The Human and The Divine. Philosophical Hermeneutics, Wiercinski, A. (Dir.), Toronto: The Hermeneutic Press.
-   Hahn, Robert (1979) “Aristotle as Ontologist or Theologian? Or, Aristotelian Form in the Context of the Conflicting Doctrines of Being in the Metaphysics”, Southwest Journal of Philosophy, 10: 79-88.
-   Hamelin, Octave (1920) Le système d’Aristote, Paris: Librairie Alcan.
-   Ibn Sina (2009) Kitab Al-Shafa: Al-Ilahiyat, trans. Ibrahim Dadjoo, Tehran: Amirkabir {in Persian}.
-   Ilkhani, Mohammad (2014) “Mowzu e Mabaad-al-tabiah; Arastoo, Ibn Sina va Thomas Aquini”, (Subject of Metaphysics; Aristotle, Ibn Sina and Thomas Aquinas) shenakht, 70/1: 33-68 {in Persian}.
-   Kant, Immanuel (1998) Kiritik der reinen Vernunft, trans. Guyer, P. and A. Wood (eds.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-   Kemp Smith, Norman (1962) A Commentary to Kant’s 'Critique of Pure Reason, Second edition, New York: Humanities Press.
-   Kiankhah, Leilia & Saeedimehr, Mohammad (2012) "Definition and the Subject matter of Metaphysics from Ibn Sina Point of View: A Study on the Influence of Farabi’s Treatise of the Objectives of Metaphysics” Avicennian Philosophy, 47: 27-52 {in Persian}.
-   Natorp, Paul (1888a) “Thema und Disposition der aristotelischen Metaphysik”, Philosophische Monatshefte, 24: 37–65; 540–574.
-   Natorp, Paul (1888b) “Über Aristoteles’ Metaphysik K 1–8, 1065a26”, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 1: 178–193.
-   Natorp, Paul (1921) Platos Ideenlehre: Eine Einführung in den Idealismus (Zweite, durchsehene und um einen metakritischen Anhang vermehrte Ausgabe), Second edition, Leipzig: Felix Meiner Verlag.
-   Owens, Joseph (1978) The Doctrine of Being in the Aristotelian 'Metaphysics': A Study in the Greek Background of Mediaeval Thought, Toronto: Pontifical Institute for Medieval Studies.
-   Palangi, Monireh (2009) “The Subject of First Philosophy According to Aristotle and Ibn Sina” Avicennian Philosophy, 40: 29-51 {in Persian}.
Send comment about this article
CAPTCHA Image

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics