نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی- پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشیار گروه فلسفۀ علم و تکنولوژی، پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی، تهران. ایران.
2 دانشیار گروه فلسفه، دانشگاه اصفهان، اصفهان. ایران
چکیده
در مقالۀ حاضر ابتدا به بررسی دلایل مخالفت با متافیزیک می‌پردازیم. قصد داریم ضمن بررسی این دلایل به موضعی مناسب در قبال جایگاه و نقش و اهمیت متافیزیک برسیم. دیدگاه‌های مختلفی دربارۀ مسئلۀ قدیمی نسبت متافیزیک و علم وجود دارد. با کمک شواهد تاریخی استدلال می‌کنیم که تعامل متافیزیک و علم تعامل پیچیده‌ای است که تنها در پرتو رویکرد نقادانه قابل دفاع است. در این نگرش نقادانه هم باید به نقش و اهمیت متافیزیک در علم توجه داشت و هم در خصوص انتظارات خود از آن تواضع معرفتی داشت.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
The Importance and Role of Metaphysics for Science
نویسندگان [English]
- Alireza Mansouri 1
- Amir Ehsan Karbasizadeh 2
1 Associate Professor of Philosophy of science & Technology, Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies, Tehran, Iran
2 Associate Professor of Philosophy, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.
چکیده [English]
In this paper, we first examine the reasons for opposing metaphysics. While assessing these reasons, we intend to reach a plausible stance regarding the relationship between science and metaphysics and its role and importance in scientific activity. There are different views on this old question. We argue that the interaction of metaphysics and science is a complex interaction that can only be defended in the light of a critical approach. In this critical attitude, one should not only pay attention to the role and importance of metaphysics in science but also should have an epistemic humility about his expectations of it.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
- Metaphysics
- Philosophy of Science
- Scientific Metaphysics
- Analytical Metaphysics
- Ontology
- Realism
- Agassi, J. (1975) 'Scientific Problems and Their Roots in Metaphysics', in Science in Flux: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Springer, Dordrecht.
- Amiriara, H. and Karbasizade, A. (2021) 'Ambiguity in Naturalized Metaphysics: a case study in the philosophy of time and theory of relativity', Sophia Perennis, Vol. 17(38): 259-281. {in persian} http://www.javidankherad.ir/article_127976.html?lang=en.
- Ansari Bonab, M. and Mansouri, A. (2021) 'The Ontological and Epistemological Necessity of Local Beables in Quantum Mechanics', Philosophical Investigations, Vol. 25(38): 33-56, https://pi.srbiau.ac.ir/article_17284.html?lang=en. {in persian}
- Bell, J.S. (2004) Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics: Collected Papers on Quantum Philosophy, Cambridge University Press.
- Bunge, M. (1971) 'Is Scientific Metaphysics Possible?', The Journal of Philosophy: 507-520.
- Callender, C. (2011) 'Philosophy of Science and Metaphysics', in French, S. and Saatsi, J. The continuum companion to the philosophy of science, A&C Black.
- Carnap, R. (1950) 'Empiricism, Semantics and Ontology', Revue Internationale de Philosophie, Vol. 4(11): 20-40.
- Chakravartty, A. (2017) Scientific Ontology: Integrating Naturalized Metaphysics and Voluntarist Epistemology, Oxford University Press.
- Da Costa, N.C. and French, S. (2003) Science and partial truth: A unitary approach to models and scientific reasoning, Oxford University Press.
- Duhem, P.M.M. (1914/1954) The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Einstein, A.; Infeld, L. (1967) 'The Evolution of Physics: Touchstone.
- Göhner, J. F. and Schrenk, M. (2021) Metaphysics of Science, [Online], Available: https://iep.utm.edu/ [10 Sep. 2021].
- Humphreys, P. (2019) 'Scientific Ontology and Speculative Ontology', in Philosophical Papers, Oxford University Press.
- Kuhn, T. (1962/2012) The structure of scientific revolutions, Princeton University Press.
- Kuhn, T. (1970) 'Logic of Discovery or Psychology of Research?', in Lakatos , I. and Musgrave, A. Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge University Press.
- Ladyman, J. and Ross, D. (2007) Every Thing Must Go: Metaphysics Naturalized, Oxford University Press.
- Lange, M. (2009) 'Review: Tim Maudlin: The Metaphysics Within Physics', Mind, vol. 118, No. 469: 197-200.
- Lyons, T.D. (2005) 'Towards a Purely Axiological Scientific Realism', Erkenntnis, vol. 63, No. 2: 167-204.
- Maudlin, T. (2007) The Metaphysics Within Physics, Oxford University Press.
- Maudlin, T. (2013) 'The Nature of the Quantum State', in wave function, Oxford University Press.
- Maudlin, T. (2014) 'What bell did', Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 47, No: 1-28.
- Maudlin, T. (2016) 'Local Beables and The Foundation of Physics', in Bell, M. and Gao, S. Quantum Nonlocality and Reality: 50 Years of Bell's Theorem, Cambridge University Press.
- Maxwell, J. C. (1878) 'Ether', in Britannica, 9th ed..
- Maxwell, N. (2004) Scientific metaphysics, [Online], Available: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/1674.
- Ney, A. (2011) 'Tim MaudlinThe Metaphysics Within Physics', J. Phil. Sci., No. 62: 683–689.
- Popper, K.R. (1979) Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach, Revised edition, Oxford University Press.
- Popper, K. (1982) Quantum Theory and the Schism in Physics, New Jersey: Rowman and Littlefield.
- Popper, K. (1983) 'Metaphysics and Criticizability', in Miller, D. A Pocket Popper, Fontana Press.
- Sklar, L. (1976) Space, Time and Spacetime, University of California Press.
)
ارسال نظر در مورد این مقاله