مجله پژوهش های فلسفی

Journal of Philosophical Investigations

شماره جاری

بر اساس شماره‌های نشریه

بر اساس نویسندگان

بر اساس موضوعات

نمایه نویسندگان

نمایه کلیدواژه ها

درباره نشریه

اهداف و چشم انداز

اعضای هیات تحریریه

فرایند پذیرش مقالات

اصول اخلاقی انتشار مقاله

بانک ها و نمایه نامه ها

پرسش‌های متداول

اخبار و اعلانات

پیوندهای مفید

Critical Consideration on God's Essence and His Features in Open Theism

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی- پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دکتری فلسفه، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

2 دانشیار گروه فلسفه، دانشکدگان فارابی) دانشگاه تهران، قم، ایران.

چکیده

Open Theism, as a new perspective in theology, has attracted attention of many scholars and mainly claims that some teachings of classical theism are not in accordance with Scripture and depict God in the way of Greek metaphysic and Hermeneutical pattern. Therefore, Open Theists proposed a new model of theology based on the notion of Openness in reaction to deterministic model of classical theism. Their point of view had some implications like mutability, temporality and direct involvement of God. But these lead to some problems in their view like inconsistency and ambiguity in addition to denying absolute perfection from Him. In this paper, we will clarify these defects and give solutions based on Islamic thought and Lastly introduce Doctrine of Badāʾ by which we will answer many of unsolved problems that led some theologians toward Open Theism. It will be shown that by Badāʾ there will be no room for inconsistency in Devine properties. 

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Critical Consideration on God's Essence and His Features in Open Theism

نویسندگان [English]

  • Eisa Mohammadinia 1
  • . Seyed Mohammad Ali Dibaji 2

1 PhD in Philosophy; University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

2 Associate Professor of Philosophy Department, Farabi Campus, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

چکیده [English]

Open Theism, as a new perspective in theology, has attracted attention of many scholars and mainly claims that some teachings of classical theism are not in accordance with Scripture and depict God in the way of Greek metaphysic and Hermeneutical pattern. Therefore, Open Theists proposed a new model of theology based on the notion of Openness in reaction to deterministic model of classical theism. Their point of view had some implications like mutability, temporality and direct involvement of God. But these lead to some problems in their view like inconsistency and ambiguity in addition to denying absolute perfection from Him. In this paper, we will clarify these defects and give solutions based on Islamic thought and Lastly introduce Doctrine of Badāʾ by which we will answer many of unsolved problems that led some theologians toward Open Theism. It will be shown that by Badāʾ there will be no room for inconsistency in Devine properties. 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • open theism
  • Islamic thought
  • divine timelessness
  • Badāʾ
  • immutability
مراجع
Al-Kuleyni, Muḥammad ibn Ya’qub. (1986). Al- Kāfi (book of Tawhid, chapter of badāʾ). Tehran: Dār al-Kutub al- Islamiyeh.
Al-Ṯūsi, Khāje Naṣir al-Din. (1984). Talkhis al-Muḥaṣṣal, vol. 1. Beirūt: Dār al-aḍwā’ (in Arabic).
Aristotle. (1941). On the Heavens & Metaphysics in The Basic Works ofAristotle, ed. Richard McKeon, New York: Random House.
Case-Winters, Anna. (1990). God’s Power: Traditional Understandings and Contemporary Challenges, Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press.
Chadwick, Henry. (1966). Early Christian Thought and the Classical Tradition: Studies in Justin, Clrnent and Origen, New York: Oxford University Press.
Fretheim, Terence. (1984). The Suffering of God. Philadelphia: Fortress.
Hasker, William & Sanders, John. (2017). Open Theism: Progress and Prospects, Theologische Literaturzeitung, 142/9, 859-872.
Hasker, William. (2004). Providence, Evil and the Openness of God. Routledge.
Ibn Fāris, Ahmad. (1983). Mo'ajam Maghāyīs al-loghah. Qom: Maktab al-A'alām al-Islamī (in Arabic).
Ibn Manẓūr, Muḥammad Ibn Mukram. (1987). Lisān al-'Arab. Beirut: Dār Ihya' al-Turaṯ al-A’rabi (in Arabic).
Luther, Martin. (1957). The Bondage of the Will, translated by J. I. Packer; O. R. Johnston, Old Tappan. New Jersey: Fleming H. Revell Co.
Mullā Sadrā, Muḥammad ibn Ibrahīm al-Shīrāzī. (1976). Al-Mabdaa' va al-Ma'aād, ed. Seyyed Jalāl al-dīn āshtīyanī. Tehran: Iran Research Institute of Philosophy (in Arabic).
Mullā Sadrā, Muḥammad ibn Ibrahīm al-Shīrāzī. (1981). Hikmat al-Muta‘aliya fi al-Asfār al-‘Aqliyya al-Arba‘a (known as Asfār). Beirūt: Dār Ihya' al-Turaṯ al-A’rabi (in Arabic).
Mullā Sadrā, Muḥammad ibn Ibrahīm al-Shīrāzī. (1999). Al-Arshīyah, ed. Muḥammad Khalīl al-labūn. Beirūt: Mu’ssiseye al-Tarīkh al-'Arabī (in Arabic).
Nash. Ronald. H. (1983). The Concept of God, Grand Rapids, Michigan: Zondervan.  
Pike, Nelson. (1992). Devine Omniscience and Voluntary Action” from ‘God, Foreknowledge and freedom, ed. John Martin Fischer. Stanford University Press.
Pinnock, Clark. (2003). Open Theism: What is this? A new teaching? and with authority. (MK 1:27), Ashland Theological Journal.
Pinnock, Clark; Richard Rice; John Sanders; William Hasker; David Basinger. (1994). The Openness of God: A Biblical Challenge to the Traditional Understanding of God. Downers Grove: Intervarsity Press.
Plato. (1937). Republic, Laws, Timaeus from Dialogues of Plato, translated by B. Jowett. New York: Random House.
Rāghib Isfahānī, A'bu al-Ghāsim. (1991). Mufradāt A'lfāz al- Quran al-Karīm. Damascus: Dār al- Ghalam (in Arabic).
Rhoda, Alan R. (2013). Open Theism and Other Models of Divine Providence, In Diller, Jeanine, Kasher, Asa (eds.), Models of God and Alternative Ultimate Realities. Springer Netherlands.
Rowan, John P. (1977). Platonic and Christian Theism, in God in Contmporary Thought: A Philosophical Perspeetive, ed. Sebastian A. Matczak. New York: Learned Publications, pp. 385-413.
Saeedimehr, M. (2018). Divine Knowledge and the Doctrine of Badāʾ. TheoLogica: An International Journal for Philosophy of Religion and Philosophical Theology, 2(1), 23-36. https://doi.org/10.14428/thl.v2i1.1683
Sanders, John. (2007). The God Who Risks; A Theology of Devine Providence. Downers Grove: Intervarsity Press.
Sheikh Mofīd. (1992). A'vāil al-Maghālāt fi al-Madhāhib wa al- Mokhtārāt, ed. Sheykh al-Islam Zanjānī. Tabriz (in Arabic).
St Thomas Aquinas. (1989). Summa Theologiae: A Concise Translation, Timothy McDermott. London: Eyre and Spottiswoode.
St. Augustine. (1960). The Confessions, Translated by John K. Ryan. New York: Image Books.
Vanhoozer, Kevin J. (2012). Remythologizing Theology: Divine Action, Passion, and Authorship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wolfson, Harry. (1947). Philo: Foundations of Religious Philosophy in Judaism, Christianity and Islam, vol. 2. Harvard University Press.
Zādhoosh, Muḥammad Rezā. (2002). Doctrine of Badāʾ and its Bibliography. in Ketāb-e Māh-e Din, Vol. 68-69, (in Persian).
ارسال نظر در مورد این مقاله
CAPTCHA Image
مجله پژوهش های فلسفی
دوره 16، شماره 41 - شماره پیاپی 41
مقالات
شماره انگلیسی (ویژه نامه فلسفه تعلیم و تربیت)
دی 1401
صفحه 386-398
فایل ها
اشتراک گذاری
ارجاع به این مقاله
آمار