The Quarterly Journal of Philosophical Investigations

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی- پژوهشی

نویسنده

استاد فلسفه، مدیر مؤسسه فلسفه بدون مرز، آمریکا

10.22034/jpiut.2021.13839

چکیده

In another essay, I’ve argued by means of a formal analogy between (i) the incompleteness of Principia Mathematica-style systems of mathematical logic (logico-mathematical incompleteness) and (ii) the incompleteness of the Standard Models in contemporary physics (physico-mechanical incompleteness), that (iii) just as the fact of logico-mathematical incompleteness entails the existence of mathematical creativity, so too the fact of physico-mechanical incompleteness entails the existence of natural creativity. Building on that line of thought, in this essay I present a new and empirically-testable strategy for completing quantum mechanics. More precisely, I argue that if we assume that the Standard Models in contemporary physics are incomplete, and if we also assume that all rational human animals are primitive sources of natural creativity via their free agency, then, by means of an appeal to Bohmian mechanics, together with the thesis that all rational human animals are primitive sources of natural creativity via their free agency, we can complete quantum mechanics.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

How to Complete Quantum Mechanics, or, What It’s Like to Be a Naturally Creative Bohmian Beable

نویسنده [English]

  • Robert Hanna

Professor of Philosophy, Director of Philosophy Without Borders- Independent philosopher, USA

چکیده [English]

In another essay, I’ve argued by means of a formal analogy between (i) the incompleteness of Principia Mathematica-style systems of mathematical logic (logico-mathematical incompleteness) and (ii) the incompleteness of the Standard Models in contemporary physics (physico-mechanical incompleteness), that (iii) just as the fact of logico-mathematical incompleteness entails the existence of mathematical creativity, so too the fact of physico-mechanical incompleteness entails the existence of natural creativity. Building on that line of thought, in this essay I present a new and empirically-testable strategy for completing quantum mechanics. More precisely, I argue that if we assume that the Standard Models in contemporary physics are incomplete, and if we also assume that all rational human animals are primitive sources of natural creativity via their free agency, then, by means of an appeal to Bohmian mechanics, together with the thesis that all rational human animals are primitive sources of natural creativity via their free agency, we can complete quantum mechanics.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • physics
  • quantum mechanics
  • Bohmian mechanics
  • physico-mechanical incompleteness
  • natural creativity
  • free agency
  • (Bell, 1987a). Bell, J.S. Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
  • (Bell, 1987b). Bell, J.S. “The Theory of Local Beables.” In (Bell, 1987a: 52-62).
  • (Bell, 1987c). Bell, J.S. “Six Possible Worlds of Quantum Mechanics.” In (Bell, 1987a: 181–195).
  • (Bell, 1987d). Bell, J.S. “La Nouvelle Cuisine.” In (Bell, 1987a: 232-248).
  • (Bohm, 1952). Bohm, D. “A Suggested Interpretation of the Quantum Theory in Terms of ‘Hidden’ Variables, I and II.” Physical Review, 85(2): 166–193.
  • (Feynman, 1967). Feynman, R. The Character of Physical Law. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • (Feynman, Leighton, and Sands, 1963). Feynman, R., Leighton, R.B., and Sands, M. The Feynman Lectures on Physics, I. New York: Addison-Wesley.
  • (Frankfurt, 1988a). Frankfurt, H. The Importance of What We Care About. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
  • (Frankfurt, 1988b). Frankfurt, H. “Alternate Possibilities and Moral Responsibility.” In (Frankfurt, 1988a: 1-10).
  • (Frankfurt, 1988c). Frankfurt, H. “Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person.” In (Frankfurt, 1988a: 11-25).
  • (Frankfurt, 1988c). Frankfurt, H. “Identification and Wholeheartedness.” In (Frankfurt, 1988a: 159-176).
  • (Frankfurt, 2004). Frankfurt, H. The Reasons of Love. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
  • (Goldstein, 2017). Goldstein, S. “Bohmian Mechanics.” In E.N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2017 Edition). Available online at URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/qm-bohm/>.
  • (Goldstein, Norsen, Tausk, and Zanghi, 2011). Goldstein, S., Norsen, T., Tausk, D.V., and Zanghi, N., “Bell’s Theorem,” Scholarpedia 6: 8378. Available online at URL = <http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Bell%27s_theorem>.
  • (Hanna, 2015). Hanna, R. Cognition, Content, and the A Priori: A Study in the Philosophy of Mind and Knowledge . THE RATIONAL HUMAN CONDITION, Vol. 5. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
  • (Hanna, 2018). Hanna, R. Deep Freedom and Real Persons: A Study in Metaphysics. THE RATIONAL HUMAN CONDITION, Vol. 2. New York: Nova Science.
  • (Hannna, 2021a). Hanna, R. “The Incompleteness of Logic, the Incompleteness of Physics, and the Primitive Sourcehood of Rational Human Animals.” Unpublished MS, 2021. Available online at URL = <https://www.academia.edu/49232541/The_Incompleteness_of_Logic_the_Incompleteness_of_Physics_and_the_Primitive_Sourcehood_of_Rational_Human_Animals_June_2021_version_>.
  • (Held, 2018). Held, C. “The Kochen-Specker Theorem.” In E.N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2018 Edition). Available online at URL =  <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2018/entries/kochen-specker/>.
  • (Nagel, 1979). Nagel, T. “What Is It Like To Be a Bat?” In T. Nagel, Mortal Questions. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. Pp. 165-180.
  • (Norton, 2013). Norton, J.D. “Chasing the Light: Einstein’s Most Famous Thought Experiment.” In J.R. Brown, M. Frappier, and L. Meynell (eds.), Thought Experiments in Philosophy, Science and the Arts. London/New York: Routledge. Pp. 123-140.
  • (Prigogine, 1997). Prigogine, I. The End of Certainty: Time, Chaos, and the New Laws of Nature. New York: Free Press.
  • (Robson, 2021). Robson, B.A. “Introductory Chapter: Standard Model of Cosmology.” Available online at URL = <https://www.intechopen.com/books/redefining-standard-model-cosmology/introductory-chapter-standard-model-of-cosmology>.
  • (Siegel, 2020). Siegel, E. “3 Simple Reasons Why Wolfram’s New ‘Fundamental Theory’ Is Not Yet Science.” Forbes (13 May 2020). Available online at URL =
  • <https://medium.com/starts-with-a-bang/3-simple-reasons-why-wolframs-new-fundamental-theory-is-not-yet-science-ebca5be3a65d>.
  • (Varela, Maturana, and Uribe, 1974). Varela, F. Maturana, H. and Uribe, R. “Autopoiesis: The Organization of Living Systems, its Characterization and a Model.” Currents in Modern Biology 5: 187-196.
  • (Whitehead and Russell, 1962). Whitehead, A.N. and Russell, B. Principia Mathematica to *56. 2nd edn., Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
  • (Wikipedia, 2021). Wikipedia. “Double-Slit Experiment.” Available online at URL = <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double-slit_experiment>.
CAPTCHA Image