Journal of Philosophical Investigations

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی- پژوهشی

نویسندگان

استادیار گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه فرهنگیان، تهران، ایران

چکیده

هدف: بررسی ادبیات پژوهش نشان داد که مطالعات بسیار اندکی با تمرکز بر توسعه معلم در رویکرد آموزش فلسفه برای کودکان گزارش شده است. بنابراین با توجه به شکاف تحقیقاتی موجود در داخل کشور، هدف پژوهش حاضر بررسی نقش فلسفه برای کودکان در توسعه حرفه­ ای معلمان می ­باشد..
روش پژوهش: رویکرد این پژوهش استقرایی و از روش کیفی برای انجام آن استفاده شده اسـت. نـوع پـژوهش میدانی و از روش مطالعه موردی استفاده شد. جامعه آماری پژوهش، اعضای هیات علمی و معلمانی بودند که در این حوزه سابقه پژوهش و تدریس داشتند. در پژوهش حاضر با استفاده از روش نمونه­ گیری هدفمند تعداد 12 نفر از اعضاء تحت مصاحبه قرار گرفتند. سپس داده‌های حاصل از آن‌ها از طریق کدگذاری باز، محوری و انتخابی، تجزیه‌ و تحلیل شد.
یافته‌ها: نتایج حاصل از یافته ­های پژوهشی نشان داد که آموزش فلسفه برای کودکان در خودشناسی، احترام به نظر دیگران، تأمل در تدریس خود، شناخت ظرفیت دانش ­آموزان­، دانش­ آموز محوری، انتقال راهبردهای تدریس آموخته شده در آموزش فلسفه برای کودکان به سایر دروس، توسعه تفکر، توسعه تسهیل گری، توسعه تحقیق مشارکتی، بهبود مهارت ارتباطی، توسعه فرهنگ، توسعه آموزش گفتگو، توسعه کار تیمی و به طور کلی در ارتقای پیشرفت حرفه ­ای معلمان نقش تاثیر­گذاری دارد.
نتیجه‌گیری: با توجه به مشارکت‌های فردی و اجتماعی روش آموزش فلسفه برای کودکان، واضح است که اجرای این رویکرد در تمامی مقاطع تحصیلی از دوره پیش ­دبستانی تا دانشگاه مفید خواهد بود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Philosophy for Children and Professional Development of Teachers (qualitative study)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Hassan Ahmadi
  • Ali Eghbali

Assistant Professor of Educational Sciences Department,, Farhangian University, Tehran, Iran

چکیده [English]

A review of the research literature showed that very few studies focusing on teacher development in the philosophy education approach for children have been reported. Therefore, according to the existing research gap in the country, the purpose of the present study is to investigate the role of Philosophy for Children in the professional development of teachers. The approach of this research is inductive and a qualitative method has been used to conduct it. The type of field research and case study method was used. The statistical population of the research was academic staff members and teachers who had research and teaching experience in this field. In the present study, 12 members were interviewed using the purposeful sampling method. Then the data obtained from them were analyzed through open, central and selective coding. The results of the research findings showed that teaching philosophy for children in self-knowledge, respect for others' opinions, reflection on one's own teaching, recognition of students' capacity, student-centeredness, transfer of teaching strategies learned in teaching philosophy for children to Other courses, development of thinking, development of facilitation, development of collaborative research, improvement of communication skills, development of culture, development of dialogue training, development of team work and generally have an impactful role in promoting the professional development of teachers. Considering the individual and social contributions of the method of Philosophy for Children, it is clear that the implementation of this approach will be useful in all educational levels from preschool to university.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • education
  • philosophy for children
  • professional development
  • teachers
  • students
برهمن، مریم؛ خدابخشی صادق­آبادی، فاطمه. (1396). آموزش فلسفه برای کودکان، فصلنامه پیشرفت­های نوین در علوم رفتاری، 2(9): 104-90.
امیری، جعفر. (1400). رابطه توسعه حرفه­ای معلمان با عملکرد تحصیلی با تاکید بر نقش میانجی پیوند با مدرسه دانش آموزان پسر متوسطه دوم، فصلنامه مدیریت و چشمانداز آموزش، 3(1): 166-139.
Akkocaoglu, N.; Celepoglu, A. (2014). Views of primary school teachers on philosophy books prepared for children. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116: 2498-2503. ‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.600
Amiri, J. (2021). The Relationship between Teachers' Professional Development and Academic Performance with Emphasis on the Mediating Role of Secondary School Boys' Bonding. Management and Educational Perspective, 3(1): 139-166. (in Persian) https://doi.org/10.22034/jmep.2021.275602.1053
Aydın, A.; Selvitopu, A.; Kaya, M. (2018). Resources Invested in Education and PISA 2015 Results: A Comparative Study. Elementary Education Online, 17(3): 1283-1301. https://dx.doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2018.466346
Bostancioglu, A. (2018). Online Communities of Practice in the Service of Teachers' Technology Professional Development: The Case of Webheads in Action. Turkish online journal of educational technology-TOJET, 17(2): 97-110. https://doi.org/http://www.tojet.net/articles/v17i2/17210.pdf
Boyraz, C.; Turkcan, B. (2021). Development of a Primary School Teacher on Philosophy with Children: An Action Research. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 13(4): 491-510 DOI: 10.26822/iejee.2021.207
Brahman, M.; Khodabakhshi Saedeghabadi, F. (2018). Teaching philosophy for children. The Journal of New Advances in Behavioral Sciences, 2(9): 90-104. (in Persian) http://ijndibs.com/article-1-83-fa.html
Cayır, N. A. (2019). Philosophy for children in teacher education: Effects, difficulties, and recommendations.‏ International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 11(2):173-180. DOI:10.26822/iejee.2019248591
Dalgar, G. (2017). Examining the effect of visual art education programme on the critical thinking skills of preschool children [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Gazi University, Graduate School of Social Sciences, Ankara, Turkey. https://doi.org/10.2307/1320854
Demissie, F. (2016). The praxis of P4C in teacher education. In Philosophy for Children. Routledge.‏ 115-121 https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315640310
Direk, N. (2013). philosophy for children. Pan Publishing.
Ferguson, L. E. I. L. A.; Braten, I. (2018). Student teachers’ beliefs about learning, teaching, and teaching knowledge. Teacher Education Practice, 31(3): 348.‏ DOI: 10.1348/000709901158398
Giraldo, F. (2021). A reflection on initiatives for teachers’ professional development through language assessment literacy. Profile Issues in TeachersProfessional Development, 23(1): 197-213.‏ DOI: 10.15446/profile.v23n1.83094
Green, L.; Condy, J.; Chigona, A. (2012). Developing the language of thinking within a classroom community of inquiry: pre-service teachers’ experiences. South African Journal of Education, 32(3): 319-330.‏ DOI: 10.15700/saje.v32n3a583
Haynes, J. (2020). Teachers Perspectives on philosophy for Children in east london schools, Project: Philosophy with Children. http://ijndibs.com/article-1-83-fa.html
Isiklar, S.; Ozturk, Y. A. (2022). The effect of philosophy for children (P4C) curriculum on critical thinking through philosophical inquiry and problem-solving skills. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 9(1): 130-142.‏ https://doi.org/10.33200/ijcer.942575.
Kathard, H.; Pillay, D.; Pillay, M. (2015). A study of teacher–learner interactions: A continuum between monologic and dialogic interactions. Language, speech, and hearing services in schools, 46(3): 222-241.‏ DOI: 10.1044/2015_LSHSS-14-0022
Kilinc, A.; Demiral, U.; Kartal, T. (2017). Resistance to dialogic discourse in SSI teaching: The effects of an argumentation‐based workshop, teaching practicum, and induction on a preservice science teacher. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(6): 764-789. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21385
Kizel, A. (2021). Against the Excluded Voices: The Challenges of Philosophy for Children in a Multi-Narratival Educational System. IchundWeltverknüpfen, 173.‏
Lam, C. M. (2021). The impact of Philosophy for Children on teachers’ professional development. Teachers and Teaching, 27(7): 642-655.‏  https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2021.1986693
Lee, C. B. (2010). Generating synergy between conceptual change and knowledge building. Human Development, 53(3): 134-152.‏ DOI: 10.1159/000315170
Li, L. (2011). Obstacles and opportunities for developing thinking through interaction in language classrooms. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 6(3): 146–158. DOI: 10.1016/j.tsc.2011.05.001
Mutlu, E. (2010). Investigating the thinking levels of children in early childhood period (60-72 months) and attitudes of preschool teachers related to thinking education. [Unpublished master dissertation]. Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Graduate School of Social Sciences, Canakkale, Turkey. https://doi.org/10.33200/ijcer.942575
Prescott, G. (2016). Challenging assumptions and making progress. in Philosophy for Children. Routledge.‏ 122-130. DOI: 10.4324/9781315640310-13
Roberts, A. F. (2006). The effects of a teacher development programme based on Philosophy for Children (Doctoral dissertation, University of the Western Cape).‏ http://etd.uwc.ac.za/bitstream/handle/11394/2078/Roberts_MPSYCH_2006.pdf?sequence=1
Sancar, R.; Atal, D.; Deryakulu, D. (2021). A new framework for teachers’ professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 101(2): 103305.‏ DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2021.103305
Scholl, R.; Nichols, K.; Burgh, G. (2016). Connecting learning to the world beyond the classroom through collaborative philosophical inquiry. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 44(5):436-454.‏ https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2015.1095279
Scott, C. L. (2015). The Futures of Learning 3: What Kind of Pedagogies for the 21st Century. Education Research and Foresight Working Papers, Unesdoc Digital Library. 8(8): 1-14. https://www.schooleducationgateway.eu/en/pub/resources/publications/education_research_and_foresig.htm
Sutcliffe, R.; Lewis, L., (2017). Teaching Philosophy and Philosophical Teaching. Routledge International Handbook of Philosophy for Children. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315726625-39/teaching-philosophy-philosophical-teaching-lizzy-lewis-roger-sutcliffe
 Tas, I. (2017). The effects of philosophy for children on theory of mind and creativity of 48–72-month-old children. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Çukurova University, Adana, Turkey.‏ http://ijcer.net/en/download/article-file/1787146
Tmone-Turkish Ministry of National Education. (2013). The curriculum of preschool education. Ankara, Turkey.
Topping, K. J.; Trickey, S. (2007). Impact of philosophical enquiry on school students’ interactive behaviour. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2(2): 73-84.‏  DOI: 10.1016/j.tsc.2007.03.001
Tsiotakis, P.; Jimoyiannis, A. (2016). Critical factors towards analysing teachers' presence in on-line learning communities. The Internet and Higher Education, 28(4): 45-58.‏ DOI: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.09.002
Wu, C. (2021). Training teachers in China to use the philosophy for children approach and its impact on critical thinking skills: A pilot study. Education Sciences, 11(5): 206.‏ DOI: 10.3390/educsci11050206
Xie, X. (2010). Why are students quiet? Looking at the Chinese context and beyond. ELT journal, 64(1): 10-20.‏ https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccp060
Zhang, N.; Liu, Q.; Zhu, J.; Wang, Q.; Xie, K. (2020). Analysis of temporal characteristics of collaborative knowledge construction in teacher workshops. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 25(2): 323-336.‏ https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-019-09422-9
Zhang, S.; Liu, Q.; Wang, Q. (2017). A study of peer coaching in teachers’ online professional learning communities. Universal Access in the Information Society, 16(2): 337-347.‏ https://doi.org/10.1007
CAPTCHA Image