نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی- پژوهشی
نویسنده
دانشیار گروه فلسفه، دانشگاه پیام نور
چکیده
Contemporary ethics and moral philosophy need a kind of revision due to their negligence in human moral capacities, ordinary life, and humans’ expectations of ethics. The assumptions and presuppositions of ethics result in their current unsatisfactory status. In this paper, we first explore and criticize those presuppositions. Then, instead of introducing ideal presuppositions of ethics, we introduce folk ethics and its components in order to show that contemporary ethics and moral philosophy should always begin with folk ethics. The most important advantage of folk ethics is its realistic foundation, which in turn will produce better results.
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
The Necessity of Considering Folk Ethics in Moral Philosophy
نویسنده [English]
- Jalal Peykani
Associate Professor, University of Payam-e Noor
چکیده [English]
Contemporary ethics and moral philosophy need a kind of revision due to their negligence in human moral capacities, ordinary life, and humans’ expectations of ethics. The assumptions and presuppositions of ethics result in their current unsatisfactory status. In this paper, we first explore and criticize those presuppositions. Then, instead of introducing ideal presuppositions of ethics, we introduce folk ethics and its components in order to show that contemporary ethics and moral philosophy should always begin with folk ethics. The most important advantage of folk ethics is its realistic foundation, which in turn will produce better results.
کلیدواژهها [English]
- folk ethics
- moral philosophy
- moral capacities
- virtue ethics
- consequentialism
- Alston, William (2005) Beyond Justification, Cornell University Press
- Bynum, Terrell (n.d), “A Copernician Revolution in Ethics”, in: idt.mdh.se/ECAP-2005/articles
- O., Sarkissian H., and Wong. D. (2007), “Naturalizing Ethics”, in Moral Psychology: The Evolution of Morality, edited by Walter Sinnott-Armstrong, vol. 1, pp. 1-26, MIT Press.
- Goldman, Alvin (1992), “Epistemic Folkways and Scientific Epistemology”, in: Liaisons: Philisophy Meets the Cognitive and Social Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, pp. 155- 175.
- Goldman, Alvin (2006), Simulating Minds: The Philosophy, Psychology, and Meuroscience of Mindreading, Oxford University Press.
- Hume, David (2003), A Treatise of Human Nature, Dover Publications.
- Hursthouse, Rosalind (2012), “Virtue Ethics”, http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-virtue.
- Karlsson, Jeker (2012), “Ethics Naturalized” in: http://www.lunduniversity.lu.se
- Lakoff, G., and Johnsom, M. (1999), Philosophy in the flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought, New York: Basic Books.
- MacIntire, Alsdair (2007), After Virtue, 3rd edition, University of Notre Dame Press
- Martin, W. Mike (1981). “Professional and ordinary morality: A reply to Freedman”, in: Ethics, No. 91, pp. 631-633.
- Prinz, Jesse (1995), “Moral Obligation and Moral Motivation”, in Kai Nielsen and Jocyelyne Couture, eds., On the Relevance of Metaethics: New Essays on Metaethics, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, supp. vol. 21, pp. 187-219.
- Prinz, Jesse (2007), “Can Moral Obligation Be Empirically Discovered?” in: Midwest Studies In Philosophy, Volume 31, Issue 1, 271–291, September 2007
- Rorty, Richard (1999), Philosophy and social hope, Penguin Books.
- Zagzebski, Linda (2009), On Epistemology, Wadsworth press.
- Zimmerman, David (1980), “Meta-ethics Naturalized”, in: Canadian Journal of Philosophy,X, No.4, pp. 637- 662.
)
ارسال نظر در مورد این مقاله