Journal of Philosophical Investigations

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی- پژوهشی

نویسنده

Emeritus Fellow, the Australian National University- Australia.

چکیده

After offering an overview of some of the main themes of Popper’s political thought, the paper argues that his account faces two problems relating to institutions. The first is that while Popper stresses the ‘rational unity of mankind’, and the potential for any of us to furnish criticisms of public policy, it is not clear what institutional means currently exist for this to enable this to take place. Second, Popper has stressed the conjectural character of even our best theories. However, at any point, some theories will have fared better in the face of criticism than others, and they may give us important information about constraints on our actions. At the same time, as ordinary citizens we may not be in a good position to understand the theories in question, let alone appraise the state of the specialised discussion of them. There is, it is suggested, a case for thinking of ways to institutionally entrench such fallible theories, especially in the current setting in which social media play an important role

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Popper’s Open Society and Its Problems

نویسنده [English]

  • Jeremy Shearmur

Emeritus Fellow, the Australian National University- Australia.

چکیده [English]

After offering an overview of some of the main themes of Popper’s political thought, the paper argues that his account faces two problems relating to institutions. The first is that while Popper stresses the ‘rational unity of mankind’, and the potential for any of us to furnish criticisms of public policy, it is not clear what institutional means currently exist for this to enable this to take place. Second, Popper has stressed the conjectural character of even our best theories. However, at any point, some theories will have fared better in the face of criticism than others, and they may give us important information about constraints on our actions. At the same time, as ordinary citizens we may not be in a good position to understand the theories in question, let alone appraise the state of the specialised discussion of them. There is, it is suggested, a case for thinking of ways to institutionally entrench such fallible theories, especially in the current setting in which social media play an important role

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Popper
  • Open Society
  • fallibilism
  • Sunstein
  • presuppositions
  • objectivity
  • fatherless society
  • post-truth
  • Habermas
  • public sphere
  • tradition
  • Plato
  • essentialism
  • demography
  • ‘divine corporation’
Acton, H. & Watkins, J. (1963). ‘Symposium: Negative Utilitarianism’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, supplementary volume 37, pp. 83-114.
Berman, G. & Fox, A. (2023). Gradual: The Case for Incremental Change in a Radical Age, Oxford University Press.
Bernstein, E. (1909). Evolutionary socialism: a criticism and affirmation, B. W. Huebsch.
Bishop, B. (2008). The Big Sort, Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
Dorling, D. & Gietel-Basten, S. (2017). Why Demography Matters, Polity.
Fuller, S. (2018). Post-Truth, London: Anthem.
Fuller, S. (2020). A Player’s Guide to the Post-Truth Condition, Anthem.
Gauss, G. (2016). The Tyranny of the Ideal, Princeton University Press.
Habermas, J. (1989). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere, MA: MIT Press.
Hayek, F. (1944). The Road to Serfdom, Routledge.
Hayek, F. (1991). The Trend of Economic Thinking, ed. W. Bartley & S. Kresge, University of Chicago Press.
Hayek, F. (1997). Socialism and War, ed. B. Caldwell, University of Chicago Press.
Hobsbawm, E. & Ranger, T. (eds) (2016). The Invention of Tradition, Cambridge University Press.
Jarvie, I. (2001). The Republic of Science, Rodopi.
Lijphart, A. (1977). Democracy in Plural Societies: A Comparative Exploration, Yale University Press.
Munz, P., (2004). Beyond Wittgenstein’s Poker, Ashgate.
Popper, K. (1945). The Open Society and Its Enemies, Routledge.
Popper, K. (1957). The Poverty of Historicism, Routledge.
Popper, K. (1963). Conjectures and Refutations, Routledge.
Popper, K. (1976). Unended Quest, Fontana.
Popper, K. (2008). After the Open Society, ed. J. Shearmur and P. Turner, Routledge.
Schilpp, P. (ed.) (1974). The Philosophy of Karl Popper, Open Court.
Schneewind, J. (2009). Essays on the History of Moral Philosophy, Oxford University Press,
Shearmur, J. (1996). The Political Thought of Karl Popper, Routledge.
Shearmur, J. (1997). 'Hayek, Keynes and the State', History of Economics Review 26.
Shearmur, J. (2006). ‘The Logic of Scientific Discovery’, in J. Shand (ed.), Central Works of Philosophy: Volume 4: The Twentieth Century: Moore to Popper, Chesham, Bucks: Acumen, pp. 262-86.
Shearmur, J. (2010). ‘Why “the Hopeless War”: Approaching Intelligent Design’, Sophia 49(4), 475ff.
Shearmur, J. (2019). ‘Contemporary Political Philosophy: post-Hayekian and Popperian reflections’, in Conference Proceedings, Conference on Political Philosophy: Argument, Challenge and Development, 15th-16th June, Changchun, Jilin: Jilin University: Center for Fundamentals of Philosophy etc, pp. 79-91.
Shearmur, J. (2021). ‘Lessons from Twentieth Century Political Philosophy before Rawls’ in Routledge International Handbook of Contemporary Social and Political Theory, 2nd edition, ed. G. Delanty & S. Turner, Routledge.
Sunstein, C. (2016). The Ethics of Influence, Cambridge University Press.
Sunstein, C. (2017). #Republic, Princeton University Press.
Thaler, R. & Sunstein, C. (2021). Nudge: The Final Edition, Allen Lane.
Wettersten, J. (1992). The Roots of Critical Rationalism, Rodopi.
CAPTCHA Image