Journal of Philosophical Investigations

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی- پژوهشی

نویسنده

دانشیار گروه ادیان و عرفان، دانشگاه سمنان، ایران.

چکیده

در این مقاله به کارکرد تخیلی، نمادین و امر واقعی به عنوان مقولات اصلی اندیشة لکان پرداخته می­شود که با بسط منطقی روانکاوی فروید حاصل شده است و نهایتاً با استفاده از شبکة مفهومی فرویدی-لکانی، ریشه­های شکل­گیری متافیزیک افلاطون بررسی خواهد شد. نتیجه قهری فلسفة وحدت­انگارانة پارمنیدس، سکوت و لازمة صیرورت­انگاری هراکلیتوس، پُرگویی است و چه بسا مرگ سقراط به واسطة بی­اعتنایی اهل وحدت به مسائل اجتماعی و ژاژخایی بی­اساس اهل کثرت باشد. طبق تفسیر فرویدی-لکانی قاعدتاً فلسفة پارمنیدس به خاطر پرداختن به ایده، منطبق بر عملکرد نمادین و فلسفة هراکلیتوس به خاطر توجه به ادراکات حسی با کارکرد تخیلی روان همخوانی دارد ولی طبق تفسیر افلاطونی استغراق در وحدت در عین نمادین بودن فعالیتی ایستا است و توجة صرف به کثرت هم در عین تخیلی بودن به نوعی پویایی بی­بنیان می­انجامد. افلاطون از کلیت و ضرورت ایده برای مقیّد کردن فرانمود شیئی استفاده می­کند و از این طریق خشونت نهفته در کارکرد تخیلی را با روحیة حقیقت­جویی در بازی ایده­ها یا دالّ­ها استعلا می­بخشد. 

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

A Freudian-Lacanian Interpretation of Formation Process of Plato's Metaphysics

نویسنده [English]

  • Ali Sanaee

Associate professor of Religions and Mysticism, Department Semnan University, Iranş

چکیده [English]

This article deals with the imaginary and symbolic function of the psyche, and the Real as the main categories of Lacan's thought, which was achieved by the logical extension of Freud's psychoanalysis, and then, by using the Freudian-Lacanian conceptual network, the roots of formation of Plato's metaphysics will be considered. A requirement of Parmenides' philosophy is silence and the inevitable outcome of Heraclitus's becoming, is idle talk, and perhaps the death of Socrates is due to the disregard of the defenders of Parmenides to social issues and the baseless discourse of the defenders of Heraclitus. According to the Freudian-Lacanian interpretation, Parmenides’ thought, which deals with the idea, corresponds to the symbolic function, and Heraclitus’ orientation, which pays attention to sensory perceptions, is compatible with the imaginary function of the psyche. However according to the Platonic interpretation, absorption in unity is a static activity, and mere attention to multiplicity leads to baseless dynamics. Plato uses the generality and necessity of the idea to limit the representation of the object and transcends the violence hidden in the imaginary function by the truth-seeking spirit in the play of ideas.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Freud
  • Lacan
  • Plato
  • imaginary function of the psyche
  • symbolic function of the psyche
Boothby, R. (2005). Freud as Philosopher: Metapsychology after Lacan. Translated by S. Sommi. Ghoghnoos Publications. (In Persian)
Brun, J. (1984). Plato and the Academy. Translated by A. Pourhosseini. Nashr-e Homa. (in Persian)
Copleston, F. (2017). A History of Philosophy. Vol. 1, Translated by S. J. Mojtabavi. Elmi va Farhangi & Sorosh. (In Persian).
Davidson, T. (1870). The Fragments of Parmenids. J. Wiley and Sons. Available in: https://ia600204.us.archive.org/29/items/fragmentsofparme00parm/fragmentsofparme00parm.pdf. (28/10/2022)
Fink, B. (2020). The Lacanian Subject: between Language and Jouissance. Translated by M. A. Jafari. Ghoghnoos Publications. (In Persian).
Freud, S. (1914). Forgetting of Proper Names. Psychopathology of Everyday Life (Chapter 1). Translated by A. A. Brill. Classics in the History of Psychology, an internet resource developed by Ch. D. Green, York University Press. https://psychclassics.yorku.ca/Freud/Psycho/chap1.htm
Freud, S. (1923). The Ego and the Id. The Standard Edition of Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. XIX. https://www.sas.upenn.edu/~cavitch/pdf-library/Freud_SE_Ego_Id_complete.pdf
Freud, S. (1930). Civilization and its discontents. The Standard Edition of Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. XXI. Available in: www.sas.upenn.edu/~cavitch/pdf-library/Freud_SE_Civ_and_Dis_complete.pdf
Harris, O. (2017). Lycan’s Return to Antiquity: between Nature and the Gods. Routledge.
Heidegger, M. (2010). Time and Being. Translated by A. Rashidian. Nashr-e Ney. (In Persian)
Kant, I. (1998). Critique of Pure Reason. Translated by P. G. A. W. Wood, Cambridge University Press.
Kofman, S. (1999). Mirror and Oneiric Mirages: Precursor of Freud. Translated by E. Davis, The Harvard Review of Philosophy. 7(1), 4-14. https://doi.org/10.5840/harvardreview1999711
Laos, N. (2015). The Metaphysics of World Order: a synthasis of philosophy, theology and politics. Pickwick Publications.
Lacan, J. (1949). The Mirror Stage as Formative of the Function of the I as Reveald in Psychoanalytic Experience. Translated by A. Sheridan. Available in: http://www.sholetteseminars.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/LacanMirrorPhase.pdf
Lacan, J. (1977). Ecrits. The First Complete Edition in English. Translated by B. Fink. In collaboration with Heloise Fink and Russell Grigg. W. W. Norton & Company.
Lacan, J. (1988). The Ego in Freud’s Theory and In the Technique of Psychoanalysis, The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book II, Jacques -Alain Miller(ed), Translated by S. Tomaselli. W. W. Norton & Company.
Lacan, J. (1998). The Four Fundamental Concepts Psychoanalysis. The Seminar of Jacques Lacan. Book XI. Translated by A. Sheridan. W. W. Norton & Company.
Nedoh, B. (2020). Anxiety and Ontology: Toward the Lacanian Materialist Metapsychology of the Affect. Newton and Philosophy of Nature, Objectivity and Fiction, 41(3). https://doi.org/10.3986/fv.41.3.05
Olivier, B. (2012). Plato, Freud, Nietzsche, the Soul and the question of human finitude. Journal of the South African Society for Greek Philosophy and Humanities. 13(1), 77-98. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC124777
Plato. (1988). A Collection of Plato's Works. Translated by M. H. Lotfi. Kharazmi Publications. (In Persian).
Saket, A. H. (2021). Universal and Particular in Plato's Works. The Quarterly Journal of Philosophical Investigations. 15(37), 952-973. Doi: 10.22034/jpiut.2021.48161.2995 (in Persian)
Shaddel, T, Imanpour, M & Atrak, H. (2021). God in Plato's philosophy. The Quarterly Journal of Philosophical Investigations. 15(34), 178-197. https://philpapers.org/pub/785/2021 (in Persian)
CAPTCHA Image