مجله پژوهش های فلسفی

Journal of Philosophical Investigations

شماره جاری

بر اساس شماره‌های نشریه

بر اساس نویسندگان

بر اساس موضوعات

نمایه نویسندگان

نمایه کلیدواژه ها

درباره نشریه

اهداف و چشم انداز

اعضای هیات تحریریه

فرایند پذیرش مقالات

اصول اخلاقی انتشار مقاله

بانک ها و نمایه نامه ها

پرسش‌های متداول

اخبار و اعلانات

پیوندهای مفید

Fichte’s Role in Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit, Chapter 4

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی- پژوهشی

نویسنده

Emeritus Professor of Philosophy Department, University of Sydney, Australia

چکیده

In this paper I return to the familiar territory of the Lord-Bondsman "dialectic" in Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit in order to raise the question of the relation of Hegel's use of the theme of recognition there to Fichte's. Fichte had introduced the notion of recognition in his Foundations of Natural Right, to "deduce" the social existence of humans within relations of mutual recognition as a necessary condition of their very self-consciousness. However, there it also functioned as part of a solution to a problem within the work on which the theory of rights was meant to be based, the earlier Foundation of the Complete Wissenschaftslehre of 1794-5. In Hegel's classic account in chapter 4 of the Phenomenology we find recognition offered as a solution to a problem within an account of "self-consciousness" that has a number of clearly Fichtean features. But I suggest that to the degree that the lord-bondsman episode there expresses any "theory of recognition", it is not Hegel’s own theory but rather his interpretation of Fichte's, a theory of which he is critical. Freed from this misleading assumption that the "lord-bondsman dialectic" represents something deep about Hegel's own philosophy, we might then be more able to get clearer about Hegel's actual views about recognition and the role it plays in his own philosophy.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Fichte’s Role in Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit, Chapter 4

نویسنده [English]

  • Paul Redding

Emeritus Professor of Philosophy Department, University of Sydney, Australia

چکیده [English]

In this paper I return to the familiar territory of the Lord-Bondsman "dialectic" in Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit in order to raise the question of the relation of Hegel's use of the theme of recognition there to Fichte's. Fichte had introduced the notion of recognition in his Foundations of Natural Right, to "deduce" the social existence of humans within relations of mutual recognition as a necessary condition of their very self-consciousness. However, there it also functioned as part of a solution to a problem within the work on which the theory of rights was meant to be based, the earlier Foundation of the Complete Wissenschaftslehre of 1794-5. In Hegel's classic account in chapter 4 of the Phenomenology we find recognition offered as a solution to a problem within an account of "self-consciousness" that has a number of clearly Fichtean features. But I suggest that to the degree that the lord-bondsman episode there expresses any "theory of recognition", it is not Hegel’s own theory but rather his interpretation of Fichte's, a theory of which he is critical. Freed from this misleading assumption that the "lord-bondsman dialectic" represents something deep about Hegel's own philosophy, we might then be more able to get clearer about Hegel's actual views about recognition and the role it plays in his own philosophy.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Hegel
  • Fichte
  • lord-bondsman dialectic
  • recognition
  • self-consciousness
مراجع
Fichte, J. G. (1964). Gesamtausgabe der Bayerischen Academie der Wissenschaften, Friedrich Frommann.
Forster, M. N. (1998). Hegel's Idea of a Phenomenology of Spirit, University of Chicago Press.
Gadamer, H. G. (1976). Hegel's Dialectic of Self-Consciousness, in Hegel's Dialectic: Five Hermeneutic Studies, translated by P. Christopher Smith, Yale University Press.
Giovanni, G. & Harris, H. S. (1985). Between Kant and Hegel: Texts in the Development of Post-Kantian Idealism, State University of New York Press. 
Harris, H. S. (1972). Hegel's Development: Toward the Sunlight 1770-1801, Clarendon Press.
Harris, H. S. (1983). Hegel's Development II: Night Thoughts (Jena 1801–6), Oxford University Press.
Harris, H.S. (1997). Hegel's Ladder, Hackett.
Hegel, G. W. F. (1969). Phänomenologie des Geistes Werke in zwanzig Bänden, ed. Eva Moldenhauer and Karl Markus Michel, Vol. 3. English translation by A. V. Miller, Hegel's Philosophy of Spirit, Oxford University Press.
Hegel, G. W. F. (1977). The Difference Between Fichte’s and Schelling’s System of Philosophy, translated H. S. Harris & W. Cerf, State University of New York Press.
Hegel, G. W. F. (1991). Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts, translated as Elements of the Philosophy of Right, Editor by A. W. Wood, Translated by H. B. Nisbet, Cambridge University Press.
Honneth, A. (1996). The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts, MIT Press.
Kant, I. (1997). Critique of Practical Reason, Editor & translated by M. Gregor, Cambridge University Press.
Kelly, G. A. (1966). Notes on Hegel's 'Lordship and Bondage, Review of Metaphysics, 19(4), 189-217.
Kojève, A. (1969). Introduction to the Reading of Hegel, translated by J. H. Nichols Jr., Cornbell University Press.
Lumsden, S. (2004). Fichte's striving subject” in Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 47(2), 123–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/00201740410005141
Martin, W. M. (1997) Idealism and Objectivity: Understanding Fichte's Jena Project, Stanford University Press.
Nagel, T. (1989). The View from Nowhere, Oxford University Press.
Pinkard, T. (1994) Hegel's Phenomenology, Cambridge University Press.
Pinkard, T. (2002) German Philosophy 1760–1860: The Legacy of Idealism, Cambridge University Press.
Pippin, R. B. (1989). Hegel’s Idealism: The Satisfactions of Self-Consciousness, Cambridge University Press.
Pippin, R. B. (2000). What is the Question for which Hegel's Theory of Recognition is the Answer?” in European Journal of Philosophy, 8, (2) 155–72, https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0378.00106
Redding, P. (1991). Hermeneutic or Metaphysical Hegelianism? Kojève's Dilemma", The Owl of Minerva, 22 175-89, https://sydney.academia.edu/PaulRedding
Redding, P. (1996) Hegel's Hermeneutics, Cornell University Press.
Samuel, L. H., Braun, H. & Riedel, M. (1969) Natur und Geschichte: Karl Lowith zum 70. Geburtstag [Book Review] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 29(3), 460. https://philpapers.org/rec/HARHBA-8
Schultz, G. E. (1722/1996). Anaesidemus, oder Über die Fundamente der von dem Herrn Prof. Reinhold in Jena gelieferten Elementar-Philosophie, reprinted Manfred Frank, Felix Meiner, Translated in part in: di Giovanni and Harris, Between Kant and Hegel.
Siep, L. (2000). Der Weg der Phänomenologie des Geistes, Suhrkamp
Siep, L. (1979). Anerkennung als Prinzip der praktischen Philosophie: Untersuchungen zu Hegels Jenaer Philosophie des Geistes, Alber Verlag.
Stewart, J. (2000). The Unity of Hegel's "Phenomenology of Spirit": A Systematic Interpretation, Northwestern University Press.
Williams, R. R. (1997). Hegel's Ethics of Recognition, University of California Press.
Williams, R. R. (1992). Recognition: Fichte and Hegel on the Other, State University of New York Press.
Williams, R. R. (1998). Hegel's Ethics of Recognition, University of California Press.
Wood, A. (1990). Hegel’s Ethical Thought, Cambridge University Press.
Zöller, G. (2002). Fichte's Transcendental Philosophy: The Original Duplicity of Intelligence and Will, Cambridge University Press.
ارسال نظر در مورد این مقاله
CAPTCHA Image
مجله پژوهش های فلسفی
دوره 17، شماره 45 - شماره پیاپی 45
مقالات
شماره 45 زمستان 1402
دی 1402
صفحه 11-28
فایل ها
هم رسانی
ارجاع به این مقاله
آمار