نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی- پژوهشی
نویسنده
Independent Scholar, South Africa
چکیده
This paper focuses on absolute spontaneity, first postulated by Immanuel Kant. In the early twentieth century spontaneity entered the domain of quantum physics when Niels Bohr included it as part of his quantum postulate. Later on, David Bohm developed the concept of a quantum potential in his description and interpretation of quantum physics, a concept that can also be understood in terms of spontaneity. A discussion of Kant’s influence on the interpretation of quantum physics is followed by a consideration of the inclusion of spontaneity in Niels Bohr’s epistemological approach to quantum mechanics and David Bohm’s quantum potential as part of his ontological approach to quantum physics. Kant’s influence on both Bohr and Bohm is examined as well as the applicability of his critical metaphysics to quantum theory. Critical metaphysics read together with Bohr and Bohm’s interpretations of quantum physics is then utilized to make some proposals with regard to the problems plaguing our best theories of physics.
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
Kant, Niels Bohr and Quantum Spontaneity
نویسنده [English]
- Willem McLoud
Independent Scholar, South Africa
چکیده [English]
This paper focuses on absolute spontaneity, first postulated by Immanuel Kant. In the early twentieth century spontaneity entered the domain of quantum physics when Niels Bohr included it as part of his quantum postulate. Later on, David Bohm developed the concept of a quantum potential in his description and interpretation of quantum physics, a concept that can also be understood in terms of spontaneity. A discussion of Kant’s influence on the interpretation of quantum physics is followed by a consideration of the inclusion of spontaneity in Niels Bohr’s epistemological approach to quantum mechanics and David Bohm’s quantum potential as part of his ontological approach to quantum physics. Kant’s influence on both Bohr and Bohm is examined as well as the applicability of his critical metaphysics to quantum theory. Critical metaphysics read together with Bohr and Bohm’s interpretations of quantum physics is then utilized to make some proposals with regard to the problems plaguing our best theories of physics.
کلیدواژهها [English]
- quantum physics
- spontaneity
- Bohr & Kant
Albert, D. Z. (1992). Quantum Mechanics and Experience, Harvard University Press.
Allais, L. (2004). Kant's One World: Interpreting Transcendental Idealism, British Journal for the History of Philosophy 12(4), 655-684. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0960878042000279314
Allison, H. E. (2012). Essays on Kant, Oxford University Press.
Allori, Valia & et al. (2008). On the Common Structure of Bohmian Mechanics and the Ghirardi-Rimini-Weber Theory, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 59(3), 353-389. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axn012
Ameriks, K. (1992). Kantian Idealism Today, History of Philosophy Quarterly 9(3), 329-34.
Auyang, S. Y. (1995). How is Quantum Field Theory Possible? Oxford University Press.
Bartels, A. (1999). Objects or Events? Towards an Ontology for Quantum Field Theory, Philosophy of Science 66(3),170-184.
Bell, John. (1990). Against 'measurement', Phys. World, 3(8), 33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/2058-7058/3/8/26
Bitbol, M. (2007). Materialism, Stances, and Open-Mindedness’, in Images of Empiricism, Edited by B. Monton, Oxford University Press.
Bitbol, M. (2008). Reflective Metaphysics: Understanding Quantum Mechanics from a Kantian Standpoint’, Philosophica 83(1), 53-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.21825/philosophica.82161
Bitbol, M. (2013). Bohr’s complementarity and Kant’s epistemology, in Séminaire Poincaré, 17, 145–166. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14316-3_8
Bitbol, M (2017). On Bohr’s Transcendental Research Program, in Niels Bohr and the Philosophy of Physics, pp. 47–66. Edited by Faye & Folse, Cambridge University Press.
Bitbol, M. & Osnaghi, S. (2013). Bohr's Complementarity and Kant's Epistemology, Bohr, 1913-2013, Séminaire Poincaré XVII:145-166.
Bohm, D. & Hiley, B. J. (1993). The Undivided Universe, Routledge.
Bohr, Niels. (1928). The Quantum Postulate and the Recent Development of Atomic Theory, Nature 121, 580–590.
Bohr, N. (1934). Atomic Theory and the Description of Nature. Cambridge University Press.
Bohr, N. (1948). On the notions of causality and complementarity, Dialectica 2(3-4), 312-319. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-8361.1948.tb00703.x
Bohr, N. (1955). Atoms and Human Knowledge. In, Atomic Physics and Human Knowledge, pp. 83-93, Wiley.
Bohr, N. (1962). The Solvay meeting and the development of quantum physics. In, Essays 1958-1962 on atomic Physics and Human Knowledge, pp. 79-100, Interscience Publishers.
Cartwright, N. (1983). How the Laws of Physics Lie? Oxford University Press.
Cartwright, N. (1989). Nature's capacities and their Measurement, Clarendon/Oxford University Press.
Chevalley, C. (1994). Niels Bohr’s Words and the Atlantis of Kantianism, in Niels Bohr and Contemporary Philosophy, pp. 33–55, Edited by J. Faye & H. Folse, Kluwer. Cambridge University Press.
Cuffaro, M. (2010). The Kantian framework of complementarity, in Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 41, 309–317. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsb.2010.04.003
Donadi, S. & et al. (2021). Underground test of gravity-related wave function collapse. Nature Physics, 17(1), 74–78. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41567-020-1008-4
Dorato, M. (2002). Kant, Gödel and Relativity', in Proceedings of the invited papers for the 11th International Congress of the Logic Methodology and Philosophy of Science, Edited by P. Gardenfors, K. Kijania-Placek, & J. Wolenski, Kluwer.
Dorato, M. (2017). Bohr’s Relational Holism and the Classical-Quantum Interaction, in Niels Bohr and the Philosophy of Physics, pp. 133–154, Edited by J. Faye & H. Folse, Bloomsbury Academic.
Earman, J. (1986). A Primer on Determinism, D. Reidel.
Fano, V. (1988). How Italian Philosophy Reacted to the Advent of Quantum Mechanics in the Thirties’, in The Nature of Quantum Mechanics, pp. 385-401, Edited by G Tarozzi & A. Merwe, Kluwer, Cambridge University Press.
Faye, J. (1991). Niels Bohr: His Heritage and Legacy. An Antirealist View of Quantum Mechanics, Kluwer Academic Publisher.
Faye, J. (2019). Copenhagen Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, Stanford Encyclopedia: https://plato.stanford.edu/ENTRIES/qm-copenhagen/.
Fiscaletti, D. (2018). The Geometry of Quantum Potential Entropic Information of the Vacuum, SpaceLife Institute. https://doi.org/10.1142/10653
Folse, H. (1985). The Philosophy of Niels Bohr: The Framework of Complementarity, North Holland.
Folse, H. (1986). Niels Bohr, Complementarity, and Realism, in PSA 1986: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association Vol. I, Edited by A. Fine & P. Machamer East Lansing: PSA, pp. 96–104, Cambridge University Press.
Gallego, M. B. (2011). The Bohm-Penrose-Hameroff model for consciousness and free will theoretical foundations and empirical evidences, Pensamiento 67 (254), 661-674.
Hameroff, S. (2012). American science documentary television series Through the Wormhole narrated by. Morgan Freeman and aired in 2012 on the Science Channel.
Hanna, R. (2006). Kant, Science and Human Nature, Oxford University.
Hanna, R & Maiese, M. (2009). Embodied Minds in Action, Oxford University.
Hanna, R & Thonpson, E. (2013). Neurophenomenology and the Spontaneity of Consciousness, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 33: sup1: 133-162.
Healey, R. (2009). Gauging What's Real. The Foundations of Contemporary Gauge Theories, Oxford University.
Hiley, B. J. (1999). Active Information and Teleportation, in Epistemological and Experimental Perspectives on Quantum Physics, Edited by D. Greenberger & et. al, Kluwer. Cambridge University Press.
Hiley, B. J. (2002). From the Heisenberg Picture to Bohm: A New Perspective on Active Information and its relation to Shannon Information', in Proc. Conf. Quantum Theory: Reconsidering of Foundations, Växjö University.
Hiley, B. J. (2010). Some Remarks on the Evolution of Bohm's Proposals for an Alternative to Standard Quantum Mechanics. Preprint.
Honner, J. (1982). The transcendental philosophy of Niels Bohr, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 13: 1–29.
Honner, J. (1987). The Description of Nature: Niels Bohr and The Philosophy of Quantum Physics, Clarendon Press.
Howard, D. (1994). What makes a classical concept classical? Toward a reconstruction of Niels Bohr’s philosophy of physics. In Niels Bohr and contemporary philosophy, Edited by J. Faye & H. Folse, Kluwer.
Howard, D. (2004). Who invented the “Copenhagen interpretation?” A study in mythology. Philosophy of Science 71:669-682. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/425941
Howard, D. (2005). Revisiting the Einstein-Bohr dialogue. Cal Tech, October 2005; Jerusalem, Bar-Hillel Lecture, December 2005; Special issue of Iyyun in honor of Mara Beller).
Hubert, M & Romano, D. (2018). The wave-function as a multi-field, European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 8(3), 521–537. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-017-0198-9
Hughes, R. I. G. (1989). The Structure and Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, Harvard University Press.
Jamali, M; Golshani, M. & Jamali, Y. (2019). A proposed mechanism for mind-brain interaction using extended Bohmian quantum mechanics in Avicenna's monotheistic perspective, Heliyon. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02130
Kaiser, D. (1992). More Roots of Complementarity: Kantian Aspects and Influences, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 23, 213–239.
Kauark-Leite, P. (2010). Transcendental philosophy and quantum physics, Manuscrito – Rev. Int. Fil. 33 243-267.
Kauark-Leite, P. (2017). Transcendental versus Quantitative Meaning of Bohr’s Complementarity Principle, in Niels Bohr and the Philosophy of Physics, pp. 67–90, Edited by J. Faye & H. Folse, Bloomsbury Academic.
Langton, R. (1998). Kantian Humility. Our Ignorance of Things in Themselves, Oxford University Press.
Levi, P. (2020). Basic Quantum Field Model of the Self-Organization of Microtubules in Eukaryotic Cells, European Journal of Biophysics 8(2), 60-75. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ejb.20200802.17
Licata, I. & Fiscaletti, D. (2014). Quantum Potential: Physics, Geometry, and Algebra, Springer-Verlag.
McLaughlin, P. (1990). Kant's Critique of Teleology in Biological Explanation, The Edwin Mellen Press.
McLoud, W. (2018). Kant, Noumena and Quantum Physics, Contemporary Studies in Kantian Philosophy 3.
Najmabadi, I. Tahmasebie, S., & Dehbashi, M. (2020). A Fresh Look at the Position of the Thing-in-Itself According to Kant and Hegel Based on the Metaphysical Foundations of David Bohm’s Quantum Physics. Journal of Philosophical Theological Research, 22(84), 49 ۔ 72. doi. 10.22091/jptr.2020.4954.2229
Penrose, R. (2022). Consciousness must be beyond computable physics. New Scientist, YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TfouEFuB-co&ab_channel=NewScientist
Peppin, R. B. (1987). Kant on the Spontaneity of Mind, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 17(2),449-476.
Poznanski, R. R. et al. (2018). Spontaneous potentiality as formative cause of thermo-quantum consciousness’, J. Integr. Neurosci 17(4). https://doi.org/10.31083/j.jin.2018.04.0418
Pringe, H. (2007). Critique of the Quantum Power of Judgment. A Transcendental Foundation of Quantum Objectivity, Walter de Gruyter.
Pringe, H. (2009). A Transcendental Account of Correspondence and Complementarity, in Constituting Objectivity: Transcendental Perspectives on Modern Physics, Edited by M. Bitbol, P. Kerszberg & J. Petitot, Springe.
Pringe, H. (2023). Kant and Bohr on Quantum Objectivity, Roum. Philosophie 67(2):247–265.
Redhead, M. (1987). Incompleteness, Nonlocality, and Realism: A Prolegomenon to the Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics, Oxford University Press.
Romano, D. (2020). Multi-field and Bohm’s theory, Synthese (11), 29. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11229-020-02737-6
Seifi, M; Ali Soltanmanesh, A & Afshin Shafiee, A. (2022). Quantum coherence on selectivity and transport of ion channels, Sci Rep. 12(1):9237. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-13323-w
Soler, Léna. (2009). The Convergence of Transcendental Philosophy and Quantum Physics: Grete Henry-Hermann’s 1935 Pioneering Proposal’, in Constituting Objectivity: Transcendental Perspectives on Modern Physics, Edited by M. Bitbol, P. Kerszberg & J. Petitot, Springer.
Teller, P. (1995). An Interpretive Introduction to Quantum Field Theory, Princeton University Press.
Tkatchenko, A & et al. (2023). Casimir Self-Interaction Energy Density of Quantum Electrodynamic Fields, Physical Review Letters. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.041601
Valente, M. B. (2010). Bohr’s quantum postulate and time in quantum mechanics, philsci-archive.pitt.edu/8335/1/Bohr%27s_quantum_postulate_and_time_in_quantum_mechanics.pdf
Van Strien, M. (2024). Why Bohm was never a determinist, in Guiding Waves in Quantum Mechanics: 100 Years of de Broglie-Bohm Pilot-Wave Theory, Edited by A. Oldofredi, Oxford University.
)
ارسال نظر در مورد این مقاله