Journal of Philosophical Investigations

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی- پژوهشی

نویسنده

Independent Philosopher, Canada

چکیده

The future of philosophy and the future of humankind-in-the-world are intimately related, not only (i) in the obvious sense that all philosophers are “human, all-too-human” animals—i.e., members of the biological species Homo sapiens, and also finite, fallible, and thoroughly normative imperfect in every other way too—hence the natural fate of all human animals is also the natural fate of all philosophers, but also (ii) in the more profound and subtle sense of what I’ll call philosophical futurism. Philosophical futurism is a critical, synoptic, and speculative reflection on the fate of humankind-in-the-world, with special attention paid not only to what humankind-in-the-world (including philosophy itself) will most likely be, if things continue to go along in more or less the same way as they have been and are now going, or could conceivably be, as in science fiction or other forms of imaginative projection, but also to what what humankind-in-the-world (including philosophy itself) ought to be, and therefore (assuming that “ought” entails “can”) can be, as the direct result of our individual and collective free agency, for the purpose of rationally guiding humankind in the near future. In my essay, I very briefly present, defend, and strongly recommend a version of philosophical futurism that I call Kantian futurism.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Kantian Futurism

نویسنده [English]

  • Robert Hanna

Independent Philosopher, Canada

چکیده [English]

The future of philosophy and the future of humankind-in-the-world are intimately related, not only (i) in the obvious sense that all philosophers are “human, all-too-human” animals—i.e., members of the biological species Homo sapiens, and also finite, fallible, and thoroughly normative imperfect in every other way too—hence the natural fate of all human animals is also the natural fate of all philosophers, but also (ii) in the more profound and subtle sense of what I’ll call philosophical futurism. Philosophical futurism is a critical, synoptic, and speculative reflection on the fate of humankind-in-the-world, with special attention paid not only to what humankind-in-the-world (including philosophy itself) will most likely be, if things continue to go along in more or less the same way as they have been and are now going, or could conceivably be, as in science fiction or other forms of imaginative projection, but also to what what humankind-in-the-world (including philosophy itself) ought to be, and therefore (assuming that “ought” entails “can”) can be, as the direct result of our individual and collective free agency, for the purpose of rationally guiding humankind in the near future. In my essay, I very briefly present, defend, and strongly recommend a version of philosophical futurism that I call Kantian futurism.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Kant
  • meta-philosophy
  • humankind
  • futurism
Haack, S. (2021). Philosophy as a Profession, and as a Calling. Syzetesis 8, 33-51.
Hanna, R (2008). Kant in the Twentieth Century. In Routledge Companion to Twentieth-Century Philosophy. Routledge. Pp. 149-203
Hanna, R.  (2023). Kantian Futurism. Unpublished MS.
Hanna, R. (2001). Kant and the Foundations of Analytic Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Hanna, R. (2006a). Kant, Science, and Human Nature. Oxford University Press.
Hanna, R. (2006b). Rationality and the Ethics of Logic. Journal of Philosophy 103, 67-100.
Hanna, R. (2006c). Rationality and Logic. MIT Press.
Hanna, R. (20115). Cognition, Content, and the A Priori: A Study in the Philosophy of Mind and Knowledge. Vol. 5, THE RATIONAL HUMAN CONDITION, Oxford University Press.
Hanna, R. (2016). Radical Enlightenment: Existential Kantian Cosmopolitan Anarchism, with a Concluding Quasi-Federalist Postscript. In Join, Or Die: Philosophical Foundations of Federalism. Pp. 63-90, Edited by Heidemann & K. Stoppenbrink.
Hanna, R. (2017 a). Exiting the State and Debunking the State of Nature, Con-Textos Kantianos 5, 167-189.
Hanna, R. (2017b). Life-Changing Metaphysics: Rational Anthropology and its Kantian Methodology.” In The Cambridge Companion to Philosophical Methodology. Edited by G. D’Oro & S. Overgaard, pp. 187-210, Cambridge University Press.
Hanna, R. (2017c). Wittgenstein and Kantianism. In Blackwell Companion to Wittgenstein. Edited by H.-J. Glock, pp. 682-698, Blackwell.
Hanna, R. (2017d). Kant, the Copernican Devolution, and Real Metaphysics. In Kant Handbook. pp. 761-789, Edited by M. Altman, Palgrave Macmillan.
Hanna, R. (2018a). Preface and General Introduction, Supplementary Essays, and General Bibliography. THE RATIONAL HUMAN CONDITION, Vol. 1. Nova Science.
Hanna, R. (2018b). Deep Freedom and Real Persons: A Study in Metaphysics. THE RATIONAL HUMAN CONDITION, Vol. 2. Nova Science.
Hanna, R. (2018c). Kantian Ethics and Human Existence: A Study in Moral Philosophy. THE RATIONAL HUMAN CONDITION, Vol. 3.  Nova Science.
Hanna, R. (2018d). Kant, Agnosticism, and Anarchism: A Theological-Political Treatise. THE RATIONAL HUMAN CONDITION, Vol. 4. Nova Science.
Hanna, R. (2020). The Kant Wars and the Three Faces of Kant. Contemporary Studies in Kantian Philosophy 5: 73-94.
Hanna, R. (2021a). The New Conflict of the Faculties: Kant, Radical Enlightenment, the Hyper-State, and How to Philosophize During a Pandemic, Con-Textos Kantianos 13: 209-233.
Hanna, R. (2021b). The Fate of Analysis: Analytic Philosophy from Frege to the Ash-Heap of History. Mad Duck Coalition.
Hanna, R. (2021c). Axioms. In Wuerth, 58.
Hanna, R. (2021d). Experience. In Wuerth, pp. 183-186.
Hanna, R. (2021e). Representation. In Wuerth, pp. 388-390.
Hanna, R. (2021f). Synthesis. In Wuerth, pp. 429-432.
Hanna, R. (2021g). Synthetic a Priori. In Wuerth, pp. 432-434.
Hanna, R. (2021h).  Jäsche Logic. In Wuerth, pp. 707-711.
Hanna, R. (2022). Six Studies in the Decline and fall of Professional Academic Philosophy, and a Real and Relevant Alternative. Borderless Philosophy 5, 48-130.
Hanna, R. (2024a). Kant, Williamson, and the Future of Analytic Philosophy. Unpublished MS.
Hanna, R. (2024b). Science for Humans: Mind, Life, the Formal-&-Natural Sciences, and a New Concept of Nature. Springer Nature.
Kant, I. (1973). OD (On a Discovery) Whereby Any New Critique of Pure Reason Has Been Made Superfluous by an Older One. Translated by H. Allison. In H. Allison, The Kant-Eberhard Controversy. Pp. 107-160. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Kant, I. (1979). CF (The Conflict of the Faculties). Translated by M. Gregor. Lincoln, University of Nebraska Press.
Kant, I. (1997). CPR (Critique of Pure Reason). Translated by P. Guyer & A. Wood. Cambridge University Press. (1781 or an edition: AK 4: 1-251; 1787 or B edition: Ak 3)
Kant, I. (2004). Prol (Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics). Translated by G. Hatfield. Cambridge University Press.
Lewin, M. & Williamson, T. (2023). Kant and Analy­sis. Kantian Journal 42 (3), 49-73.
Lewin, M. (2023a). Kant and Analysis. In (Lewin and Williamson, 2023).
Lewin, M. (2023b). Kant on Philosophy as Conceptual Analysis. Con-Textos Kantianos 18: 11-20.
Schopenhauer, A. (2014). On University Philosophy. In Parerga and Paralipomena: Short Philosophical Essays. Translated by S Roehr & C. Janaway. Cambridge University Press. Vol. 1. pp. 125-176.
Wuerth, J. (Ed.). (2021). Cambridge Kant Lexicon. Cambridge University Press.
CAPTCHA Image