مجله پژوهش های فلسفی

Journal of Philosophical Investigations

شماره جاری

بر اساس شماره‌های نشریه

بر اساس نویسندگان

بر اساس موضوعات

نمایه نویسندگان

نمایه کلیدواژه ها

درباره نشریه

اهداف و چشم انداز

اعضای هیات تحریریه

فرایند پذیرش مقالات

اصول اخلاقی انتشار مقاله

بانک ها و نمایه نامه ها

پرسش‌های متداول

اخبار و اعلانات

پیوندهای مفید

Reason(s) have Weight with the Evidence of Practical Reason

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی- پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 Research Scholar, School of Philosophy and Culture, Shri Mata Vaishno Devi University, India

2 Assistant Professor, School of Philosophy and Culture, Shri Mata Vaishno Devi University, India

چکیده

Practical reason is the use of reason to decide how to act and perform in a social reality. When someone deliberates about what to do, one puts all the reasons for the action, and then all the reasons against the action will determine the outcome of the action. In that situation, we can describe that practical action with reason because we will determine reason with the weight of different reasons not on the weighing reasons. In this paper, we analyze that reasons have weight against the theory that weights of reasons have no role in a theory of reasoning, and defend that reasons have weight with the evidence of practical reasons. The aim of this paper is to argue that weight of reasons has a role in the process of reasoning. In every situation of life, we can use have reason and weight of reason according to the practical situation of life.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Reason(s) have Weight with the Evidence of Practical Reason

نویسندگان [English]

  • Reena Kumari 1
  • Madhu Mangal Chaturvedi 2
  • Ravi Kumar 1

1 Research Scholar, School of Philosophy and Culture, Shri Mata Vaishno Devi University, India

2 Assistant Professor, School of Philosophy and Culture, Shri Mata Vaishno Devi University, India.

چکیده [English]

Practical reason is the use of reason to decide how to act and perform in a social reality. When someone deliberates about what to do, one puts all the reasons for the action, and then all the reasons against the action will determine the outcome of the action. In that situation, we can describe that practical action with reason because we will determine reason with the weight of different reasons not on the weighing reasons. In this paper, we analyze that reasons have weight against the theory that weights of reasons have no role in a theory of reasoning, and defend that reasons have weight with the evidence of practical reasons. The aim of this paper is to argue that weight of reasons has a role in the process of reasoning. In every situation of life, we can use have reason and weight of reason according to the practical situation of life.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • reason
  • value
  • weight reason
  • practical reason
  • normative reason
مراجع
Anderson, P. (2022). The Art of Abductive Reasoning, San Francisco, Logic Press
Aristotle. (350 BCE). Nicomachean Ethics. Translated by W.D. Ross. Oxford University Press.
Arcus, M. E. (1980). Value Reasoning: An Approach to Values Education. Family Relations. 29(2) , 163-171. https://doi.org/10.2307/584067
Bentham, J. (1789). An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation, T. Payne
Broome, J. (2002). Reason and Nature: Essays in the Theory of Rationality. In J. L. Millar, Practical Reasoning (pp. 85-111). Oxford University Press.
Broome, J. (2005). Weighing Goods: Equality, Uncertainty, and Time. Oxford University Press.
Broome, J. (2008). Reply to Southwood, Kearns and Star, and Cullity. Ethics 119. In Ethics (pp. 96-108). University of Chicago.
Clark, R. (2020). Unconscious Cognition, Mind Matters
Chang, R. (2020). Do we have normative powers? Aristotelian Society Supplementary, 94 (1) , 275-300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/arisup/akaa012
Davis, L. (2019). Cognitive Processes in Decision Making, Cognitive Science Press.
D Fogal, O. R. (2023). The weight of reasons. Philosophical Studies ,180(9), 1-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11098-023-01974-y
Dancy, J. (2002). Reasons for Action. In J. Dancy, Practical Reality, Oxford University Press.
Drai, D. (2018). Reasons Have no Weight. The Philosophical Quarterly , 60-76.
Evans, J. (2019). Justifying Actions Through Reason, Ethical Press.
Foot, P. (1978). Virtues and Vices. University of California Press.
Frege, G. (1892). Über Sinn und Bedeutung. In Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik.
Gorham, G. (Sep., 2002). Descartes on the Innateness of All Ideas. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 32,(3), 355-388. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/40232155
Gregory, A. (2016). Normative Reasons as Good Bases . Philosophical Studies 9 , 2291-2310.
Hempel, C. G. (1965). Aspects of Scientific Explanation, The Free Press.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324271986_Reasoning
https://www.mindtools.com/a3ixqae/critical-thinking?from=shared-link
https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12429
https://plato.stanford.edu/Entries/reasons-just-vs-expl/
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/practical-reason/
https://iep.utm.edu/prac-med/
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/374421004_A_Study_of_Value_Education_in_the_Panchatantra
Jones, B. (2019). Patterns in Inductive Reasoning, Learning Publishers.
James, W. (1907). Pragmatism: A New Name for Some Old Ways of Thinking, Longmans, Green, and Co.
Johnson, T. (2018). Logical Inference and Mental Processes, Academic Press.
Kant, I. (1785). Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, Johann Friedrich Hartknoch
Korsgaard, C. M. (1996). The Sources of Normativity. Cambridge University Press.
Maguire, B. (2016). The value based Theory of Reasons. Journal of Philosophy, 3, 233-262. http://dx.doi.org/10.3998/ergo.12405314.0003.009
Maguire, E. L. (2017). Weighing Reasons. oxford University Press.
Maguire, B. (2016). The Weight of Reasons: A Study in Value and Decision Making, Oxford University Press.
Mill, J. S. (1863). Utilitarianism, Parker, Son, and Bourn.
Miller, S. (2017). Complex Problem Solving and Reasoning, Thoughtful Books.
Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice, Harvard University Press.
Roberts, M. (2018). Adaptability and Reasoning.  Adaptive Minds Publishing
Ricco, R. B. & Overton, W. F. (2009). Reasoning. To appear in V. S. Ramachandran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior, 2nd Edition.
Sharma, P. V. (1990). Panchatantra . In G. L. Chandiramani. Rupa Publications India .
Kearns, S. & Star, D. (2013). Weighing Reasons. Journal of Moral Philosophy, 70-86.
Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (2009). Moral Skepticism and Moral Judgment, Oxford University Press.
Singer, P. (1972). Hunger, Poverty, and the Ethics of Giving, Random House.
Smith, C. (2020). Principles of Deductive Reasoning, Thoughtful Books.
Sartre, J. P. (1943). Being and Nothingness, Gallimard.
Taylor, L. (2020). Financial Planning and Reason, Money Matters.
Thompson, L. (2020). The Role of Reasoning in Human Thought, Cognitive Science Books.
Whiting, D. (2017). Right in some respects: reasons as evidence. Philosophical Studies, 175(9), 2191–2208. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11098-017-0954-x
Wilson, G. (2021). Principles and Practices of Inductive Reasoning, Learning Publishers.
ارسال نظر در مورد این مقاله
CAPTCHA Image
مجله پژوهش های فلسفی
دوره 18، شماره 47 - شماره پیاپی 47
مقالات
ویژه‌نامه فلسفه کانت در قرن21 (تابستان1403)
مرداد 1403
صفحه 233-250
فایل ها
هم رسانی
ارجاع به این مقاله
آمار