Journal of Philosophical Investigations

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی- پژوهشی

نویسنده

Department of Biological and Biomedical Sciences and Department of Philosophy, Emory University, USA

چکیده

This paper bridges contemporary neuroscience theories and Hegelian philosophy, centering on Karl Friston’s Free Energy Principle (FEP). Neuroscience models like the Bayesian brain hypothesis and predictive coding depict the brain as a predictive machine, echoing Hermann von Helmholtz’s concept of unconscious inference, where perception is shaped by prior knowledge. The FEP, rooted in information theory and statistical physics, suggests organisms minimize sensory surprise through unconscious and active inference, providing a model for behavior and explaining the purposiveness of biological systems. Some scholars assert that Georg W. F. Hegel’s view of living beings in his Philosophy of Nature aligns with the FEP, portraying them as purposive and enactive systems. This paper extends this idea, proposing that Hegel’s 'System of Science' in the Phenomenology of Spirit functions as a free energy-minimizing system. It discusses predictive coding and the FEP, establishing criteria for a system that minimizes free energy, and applies these criteria to Hegel’s work. The paper argues that the dialectical narrative in the Phenomenology operates as a reflective system driven to minimize logical or conceptual free energy, ultimately advancing the spirit towards absolute spirit. This Hegelian predictive model generates expectations essential for dialectical progression.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Hegel’s Internal Engine – Free Energy Minimization at Play in the Phenomenology of Spirit

نویسنده [English]

  • Caius R Gibeily

Department of Biological and Biomedical Sciences and Department of Philosophy, Emory University, USA

چکیده [English]

This paper bridges contemporary neuroscience theories and Hegelian philosophy, centering on Karl Friston’s Free Energy Principle (FEP). Neuroscience models like the Bayesian brain hypothesis and predictive coding depict the brain as a predictive machine, echoing Hermann von Helmholtz’s concept of unconscious inference, where perception is shaped by prior knowledge. The FEP, rooted in information theory and statistical physics, suggests organisms minimize sensory surprise through unconscious and active inference, providing a model for behavior and explaining the purposiveness of biological systems. Some scholars assert that Georg W. F. Hegel’s view of living beings in his Philosophy of Nature aligns with the FEP, portraying them as purposive and enactive systems. This paper extends this idea, proposing that Hegel’s 'System of Science' in the Phenomenology of Spirit functions as a free energy-minimizing system. It discusses predictive coding and the FEP, establishing criteria for a system that minimizes free energy, and applies these criteria to Hegel’s work. The paper argues that the dialectical narrative in the Phenomenology operates as a reflective system driven to minimize logical or conceptual free energy, ultimately advancing the spirit towards absolute spirit. This Hegelian predictive model generates expectations essential for dialectical progression.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Hegel
  • neuroscience
  • predictive coding
  • free energy principle
  • phenomenology
  • dialectics
Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an Ecology of Mind: Collected Essays in Anthropology, Psychiatry, Evolution, and Epistemology. University of Chicago Press
Bruno, G. A. (2023). From Time into Eternity: Schelling on Intellectual Intuition, pp. 1–15
Butler, C. (2012). The dialectical method: a treatise Hegel never wrote. Humanity Books.
Boonstra, E. A. & Slagter, H. A. (2019). The Dialectics of Free Energy Minimization, Journal of frontiers in systems neuroscience,13 (42), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2019.00042
Chemero, A. (2009). Radical embodied cognitive science. MIT Press.
Dahlstrom, D. (2013). The Self before Self-Consciousness: Hegel’s Developmental Account. Hegel Bulletin, 34(2), 135–158. https://doi.org/10.1017/hgl.2013.20
de-Wit, L., Machilsen, B., Putzeys, T. (2010). Predictive coding and the neural response to predictable stimuli. J Neurosci. 30(26), 8702-3. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2248-10.2010
Festinger, L., Riecken, H. W. & Schachter, S. (1956). When prophecy fails. University of Minnesota Press.
Friston, K. (2009). The free-energy principle: a rough guide to the brain? Trends in cognitive sciences, 13(7), 293–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2009.04.005
Friston, K., Daunizeau, J. & Kiebel S. J. (2009). Reinforcement Learning or Active Inference? PLOS ONE, 4(7), e6421. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0006421
Friston, K. (2010). The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory? Nat Rev Neurosci 11(2), 127–138. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2787
Friston, K., Kilner, J. & Harrison, L. (2006). A free energy principle for the brain. Journal of physiology, Paris, 100(1-3), 70–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphysparis.2006.10.001
Gambarotto, A. & Mossio, M. (2024). Enactivism and the Hegelian Stance on Intrinsic Purposiveness. Phenom Cogn Sci 23, 155–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-022-09823-9
Guberman, S. (2017). Gestalt Theory Rearranged: Back to Wertheimer. Psychol. 8, 1782. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01782
Hegel, G. W. F. (2018). The Phenomenology of Spirit. Pinkard T. & Baur M., eds. Cambridge University Press.
Helmholtz, H. L. (1948). Concerning the perceptions in general, first pub: 1867.
Houlgate, S. (2012). Hegel's Phenomenology of spirit: a reader's guide. Bloomsbury Academic.
Kaaronen R. O. (2018). A theory of predictive dissonance: Predictive processing presents a new take on cognitive dissonance. Frontiers in Psychology 9,1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02218
Malabou, C. (2000). The Future of Hegel: Plasticity, Temporality, Dialect icl 15.
Malabou, C. (2008). What should we do with our brain?  Translated by S. Rand. Fordham University Press.
Maybee, J. E. (2020). Hegel’s Dialectics, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosoph, URL= https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2020/entries/hegel-dialectics/
Pezzulo, G. & Sims, M. (2021). Modelling ourselves: what the free energy principle reveals about our implicit notions of representation, Synthese, Vol. 199 Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-021-03140-5
Pinkard, T. P. (2023). Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit: A Guide, OUP Usa.
Pippin, R. (2022). The Many Modalities of Wirklichkeit in Hegel’s Wissenschaft der Logik, in Wirklichkeit. Beiträge zu einem Schlüsselbegriff der Hegelschen Philosophie, pp. 43-58) http://doi.org/10.5771/9783465106647-43 
Wade, N. J. (2021). The vision of Helmholtz. Journal of the History of the Neurosciences, 30(4), 405–424. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20416695211022374
Wertheimer, M. (1923). Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt. II. Psychol. Forsch. 39(1), 301–350. https://doi.org/1010.1007/BF00410640
CAPTCHA Image