Alper Ay, F., Karakaya, A. & Yilmaz, K. (2015). Relations Between Self-Leadership and Critical Thinking Skills. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 207, 29 –41.
Arató, F. (2014). Deconstruction of education. Practice and Theory in Systems of Education, 9(2), 83–89.
Badamchi, M. H. (2021). Forupashi-ye kelas-e sonnati dar farayand-e majazi shodan va tarh-e yek kelas-e alternative [The collapse of the traditional classroom in the virtualization process and the proposal of an alternative classroom]. Daneshgah-e Emrooz, 5, 155–158.
Bell, R. L., Blair, L. M., Crawford, B. A., & Lederman, N. G. (2005). Just do it? Impact of a guided inquiry approach on students' understanding of scientific inquiry. Science Education, 89(3), 384–402.
Brown, G. (2003). Teacher-centered models and their implications for learning. Educational Review, 55(2), 123–134.
Bruner, J. S. (1961). The act of discovery. Harvard Educational Review, 31(1), 21–32.
Burbules, N. C. (1996). Deconstructing “difference”: A postmodern critique of educational equality. Educational Theory, 46(2), 179–193.
Cornelius-White, J., & Harbaugh, A. P. (2010). Learner-centered instruction: Building relationships for student engagement and success. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Davidson, S. G., Jaber, L. Z., & Southerland, S. A. (2020). Emotions in the doing of science: Exploring epistemic affect in elementary teachers’ science research experiences. Science Education, 104(6), 1008–1040.
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and Education. New York: Macmillan.
Duschl, R., & Grandy, R. (Eds.). (2013). Teaching Scientific Inquiry: Recommendations for Research and Implementation. Sense Publishers.
Ennis, R. H. (2002). Goals for a critical thinking curriculum and its assessment. In Arthur L. Costa (Ed.), Developing minds (3rd Edition). Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Ennis, R. H. (2018). Critical thinking across the curriculum: A vision. Topoi, 37(1), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-016-9401-4
Erduran, S. (2021). Respect for evidence: Can science education deliver it? Science & Education, 30(3), 441–444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00245-8
Fiume, P. (2005). Constructivist theory and border pedagogy foster diversity as a resource for learning. College Quarterly, 8(1), 51–64.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Continuum.
Gillies, Donald (1993). Philosophy of Science in the Twentieth Century: Four Central Themes. Blackwell.
Hawkins, D. (1994). Constructivism: Some history. In P. Fensham, R. Gunstone, & R. White (Eds.), The Content of Science: A Constructivist Approach to its Teaching and Learning (pp. 9–13). Falmer Press.
Hitchcock, D. (2017). Critical thinking as an educational ideal. In On reasoning and argument (pp. 477–497). Springer.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark. Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99–107.
Kafai, Y. B., Peppler, K., & Chapman, R. (Eds.). (2009). The Computer Clubhouse: Creativity and constructionism in youth communities. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Khabbazikenari, M. and Rahbar, N. (2022). Analyzing the Teaching Style of a Deconstructive Narrative; What does Derrida say about this? Journal of Philosophical Investigations, 16(40), 557-568.
Kuhn, T. (1977). The Essential Tension. Chicago. The University of Chicago Press.
Kuhn, T. S. (1996). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (3rd ed.). University of Chicago Press.
Lederman, N. G. (2006). Syntax of nature of science within inquiry and science instruction. In L. B. Flick & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Scientific inquiry and nature of science (pp. 301–317). Dordrecht; Springer.
Matthews, M.R. (2024). Thomas Kuhn and Science Education. Sci & Educ 33, 609–678.
Mayer, R. E. (2004). Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? American Psychologist, 59(1), 14–19.
McComas, W. F. (Ed.) (2020). Nature of science in science instruction: Rationales and strategies, Cham: Springer.
McIntyre, L. (2021). Talking to science deniers and sceptics is not hopeless. Nature, 596(7871), 165–165. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-02152-y
Normand, M. P. (2008). Science, skepticism, and applied behavior analysis. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 1(2), 42–49.
Novak J. D. (ed) (1987). Misconceptions and Educational Strategies in Science and Mathematics (3 vols). Cornell University.
Novak, J. D. (1977). A Theory of Education (Paperback). Cornell University Press.
Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Popenici, S.A.D., Kerr, S. (2017). Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on teaching and learning in higher education. RPTEL 12, 22.
Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211–227.
Quale, A. (2008). Radical Constructivism. Sense Publishers, Rotterdam.
Quintana, C., et al. (2004). A framework for supporting metacognitive aspects of online inquiry through software-based scaffolding. Educational Psychologist, 39(4), 269–313.
Rapp, A. C., & Corral-Granados, A. (2021). Understanding inclusive education – a theoretical contribution from system theory and the constructionist perspective. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 28(4), 423–439.
Resnick, M. (2017). Lifelong Kindergarten: Cultivating creativity through projects, passion, peers, and play. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Resnick, M., Rusk, N., & Cooke, S. (1998). The Computer Clubhouse: Technological fluency in the inner city. In D. Schon, B. Sanyal, & W. Mitchell (Eds.), High technology and low-income communities (pp. 266–286). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Rusk, N., Resnick, M., & Cooke, S. (1999). The Computer Clubhouse: Preparing young people for the digital age. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 8(4), 255–273.
Sajadi, S. H. (2025b). Integrating the Nature of Science in Science Instruction: Introducing a Hermeneutic and Discussion-Based Approach.
International Journal of Science Education, 1–20.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2025.2553250
Schweisfurth, M. (2013). Learner-centred education in international perspective: Whose pedagogy for whose development? London, UK: Routledge.
Sedaqat, A., Talaei, L., & Rezaei Sani, T. (2019). A structural analysis of teaching physics using the Predict–Observe–Explain (POE) method, Roshd-e Amoozesh-e Fizik, 35(1), 2–6.
Sengupta-Irving, T., & Enyedy, N. (2014). Why Engaging in Mathematical Practices May Explain Stronger Outcomes in Affect and Engagement: Comparing Student-Driven with Highly Guided Inquiry. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 24(4), 550–592.
Tena-Sánchez, J., & León-Medina, F. J. (2022). Y aún más al fondo del “bullshit”: El papel de la falsifcación de preferencias en la difusión del oscurantismo en la teoría social y en la sociedad [And even deeper into “bullshit”: The role of preference falsifcation in the difussion of obscurantism in social theory and in society]. Scio, 22, 209–233.
von Glasersfeld, E. (1989). Cognition, construction of knowledge and teaching. Synthese, 80(1), 121–140.
von Glasersfeld, E. (1993). Questions and answers about radical constructivism. In K. Tobin (Ed.), The Practice of Constructivism in Science Education’ (pp. 23–38). AAAS Press.
Westbrook, J., et al. (2013). Pedagogy, curriculum, teaching practices and teacher education in developing countries. Education Rigorous Literature Review. London, UK: Department for International Development (DFID).
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100.
)
ارسال نظر در مورد این مقاله