From Hegel to Heidegger… And back

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی- پژوهشی

نویسنده

استاد مدرسه عالی اروپاییEGS سوییس

10.22034/jpiut.2025.21082

چکیده

Robert Pippin was for decades among the most outspoken American Hegelians, defending Hegel’s idealist legacy not only against the post-Hegelian turn towards non-discursive or non-notional reality but also rejecting Heidegger’s treatment of Hegel. So it comes as a shock when,in his new book The Culmination (Pippin, 2024), he endorses Heidegger’s characterization of Hegel’s thought as the culmination of Western metaphysics, as the full deployment of its basic premise that being equals logos, i.e., that the truth of everything that exists (or that can exist) can be articulated in the form of discursive judgments, so that the full system of logic is at the same time a full ontology, the description of conditions that everything that exists should meet. In all probability, Heidegger’s answer would have been that capitalism is just one among ontic organizations of the technological disclosure of Being – as he put it, Soviet Union and the US are “metaphysically the same.” To this we should insist that capitalism is not simply an ontic phenomenon, one of the possible versions of technological attunement: capitalism is not just a social phenomenon, it also has a transcendental-ontological status. It is not modern science and technology as such which push us to continuous domination over and exploitation of nature – they function like this only within the frame of capitalism with its permanent propensity towards expanded self-reproduction. So, Pippin is right here: it is not enough to mention technological disponibility as the source of the disappearance of Meaningfulness – one should add the word “capitalism” never used by Heidegger. Here Marx surprisingly meets radical conservatives: Patrick Buisson, the French ultra-conservative, was right in claiming that “le grand deconstructeur, c’est le capitalisme.”

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

From Hegel to Heidegger… And back

نویسنده [English]

  • Slavoj Žižek
Professor of Philosophy and Psychoanalysis at The European Graduate School/ EGS, Saas Fee -Switzerland
چکیده [English]

Robert Pippin was for decades among the most outspoken American Hegelians, defending Hegel’s idealist legacy not only against the post-Hegelian turn towards non-discursive or non-notional reality but also rejecting Heidegger’s treatment of Hegel. So it comes as a shock when,in his new book The Culmination (Pippin, 2024), he endorses Heidegger’s characterization of Hegel’s thought as the culmination of Western metaphysics, as the full deployment of its basic premise that being equals logos, i.e., that the truth of everything that exists (or that can exist) can be articulated in the form of discursive judgments, so that the full system of logic is at the same time a full ontology, the description of conditions that everything that exists should meet. In all probability, Heidegger’s answer would have been that capitalism is just one among ontic organizations of the technological disclosure of Being – as he put it, Soviet Union and the US are “metaphysically the same.” To this we should insist that capitalism is not simply an ontic phenomenon, one of the possible versions of technological attunement: capitalism is not just a social phenomenon, it also has a transcendental-ontological status. It is not modern science and technology as such which push us to continuous domination over and exploitation of nature – they function like this only within the frame of capitalism with its permanent propensity towards expanded self-reproduction. So, Pippin is right here: it is not enough to mention technological disponibility as the source of the disappearance of Meaningfulness – one should add the word “capitalism” never used by Heidegger. Here Marx surprisingly meets radical conservatives: Patrick Buisson, the French ultra-conservative, was right in claiming that “le grand deconstructeur, c’est le capitalisme.”

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Sexuality
  • Antagonism
  • Phallus
  • Undeadness
  • Buddhism
  • Lathouse

مراجع

Buisson, P. (2023). La fin d’un monde [Video]. YouTube.
Dugin, A. (2023). Templars of the proletariat. London: Arktos.
Freud, S. (1953–1974). The standard edition (Vol. 1). London: Hogarth Press.
Hawking, S., & Mlodinow, L. (2010). The grand design. New York: Bantam.
Hegel, G. W. F. (1974). Jenaer Realphilosophie. In Frühe politische Systeme (p. 204). Frankfurt: Ullstein.
Hegel, G. W. F. (1977). Phenomenology of spirit. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hegel, G. W. F. (n.d.). Encyclopaedia (Par. 408, Addition). Quoted in the subjective spirit. Retrieved from https://www.marxists.org
Heidegger, M. (1975–). Beiträge zur Philosophie (Vom Ereignis). In Gesamtausgabe (Vol. 65). Frankfurt: Vittorio Klostermann.
Heidegger, M. (1979). Heraclitus seminar (with E. Fink). Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
Heidegger, M. (1984). Hölderlins Hymne “Der Ister.” In Gesamtausgabe (Vol. 53). Frankfurt: Vittorio Klostermann.
Heidegger, M. (1997). Anmerkungen I. In Anmerkungen I–V, Gesamtausgabe (Vol. 25, p. 151). Frankfurt: Vittorio Klostermann.
Heidegger, M. (2014). Überlegungen XII (Gesamtausgabe, Vol. 96). Frankfurt: Vittorio Klostermann.
Heidegger, M. (2015). Anmerkungen I–V (Gesamtausgabe, Vol. 97). Frankfurt: Vittorio Klostermann.
Heidegger, M. (2017). Zollikoner Seminare. Frankfurt: Vittorio Klostermann.
Heidegger, M. (2018). The question concerning the thing: On Kant’s doctrine of the transcendental principles. Blue Ridge Summit: Rowman & Littlefield.
Heidegger, M. (n.d.). Gesamtausgabe (Vol. 8, p. 71). Frankfurt: Vittorio Klostermann.
IJPT. (n.d.). International Journal of Philosophy and Theology, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.22609/3.1.2
Kant, I. (n.d.). Imagination in Critique of pure reason. Retrieved from https://www.degruyter.com
Lacan, J. (2004). The four fundamental concepts of psychoanalysis. New York: Routledge.
Leader, D. (2023). Is it ever just sex? London: Hamish Hamilton.
Pippin, R. (2024). The culmination. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Solomon, R. C. (1983). In the spirit of Hegel. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Trawny, P. (2016). Heidegger and the Shoah. In Reading Heidegger’s Black Notebooks 1931–1941 (p. 175). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Verene, D. P. (1985). Hegel’s recollection. Albany: SUNY Press.
Žižek, S. (1996). The indivisible remainder: An essay on Schelling and related matters. London: Verso Books.
Žižek, S. (2012). Less than nothing: Hegel and the shadow of dialectical materialism. London: Verso Books.
ارسال نظر در مورد این مقاله
CAPTCHA Image
مجله پژوهش های فلسفی
دوره 19، شماره 53 - شماره پیاپی 53
مقالات
شماره 53 زمستان 1404
دی 1404
صفحه 1-24

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار