مجله پژوهش های فلسفی

Journal of Philosophical Investigations

شماره جاری

بر اساس شماره‌های نشریه

بر اساس نویسندگان

بر اساس موضوعات

نمایه نویسندگان

نمایه کلیدواژه ها

درباره نشریه

اهداف و چشم انداز

اعضای هیات تحریریه

فرایند پذیرش مقالات

اصول اخلاقی انتشار مقاله

بانک ها و نمایه نامه ها

پرسش‌های متداول

اخبار و اعلانات

پیوندهای مفید

How to Escape Irrelevance: Performance Philosophy, Public Philosophy and Borderless Philosophy

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی- پژوهشی

نویسنده

استاد فلسفه، دانشگاه کلرادو آمریکا

چکیده

 Carlo Cellucci has rightly pointed out that contemporary professional academic philosophy has a serious problem of irrelevance. Performance philosophy and public philosophy are two recent attempts to solve that problem and radically transform professional academic philosophy into what I call real philosophy. Nevertheless, performance philosophy and public philosophy have some prima facie problems. My goal in this essay is to make some headway towards solving these two prima facie problems, first, by briefly describing ways of conceptually clarifying and purposively unifying performance philosophy and public philosophy individually; second, by briefly presenting a mediating theoretical and practical framework that could solve the incoherence problem and the two solitudes problem, and also directly and reciprocally connect performance philosophy and public philosophy: a framework I call borderless philosophy; and third and finally, against the backdrop of that mediating framework, in response to a possible objection to my argument, by briefly proposing a way in which performance philosophy, via borderless philosophy, could significantly enrich public philosophy. The upshot is that borderless philosophy, together with performance philosophy and public philosophy, collectively yield a fully adequate solution to the problem of irrelevance.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

How to Escape Irrelevance: Performance Philosophy, Public Philosophy and Borderless Philosophy

نویسنده [English]

  • Robert Hanna

Professor of Philosophy, University of Colorado, independent philosopher, and Director of The Contemporary Kantian Philosophy Project, USA

چکیده [English]

 Carlo Cellucci has rightly pointed out that contemporary professional academic philosophy has a serious problem of irrelevance. Performance philosophy and public philosophy are two recent attempts to solve that problem and radically transform professional academic philosophy into what I call real philosophy. Nevertheless, performance philosophy and public philosophy have some prima facie problems. My goal in this essay is to make some headway towards solving these two prima facie problems, first, by briefly describing ways of conceptually clarifying and purposively unifying performance philosophy and public philosophy individually; second, by briefly presenting a mediating theoretical and practical framework that could solve the incoherence problem and the two solitudes problem, and also directly and reciprocally connect performance philosophy and public philosophy: a framework I call borderless philosophy; and third and finally, against the backdrop of that mediating framework, in response to a possible objection to my argument, by briefly proposing a way in which performance philosophy, via borderless philosophy, could significantly enrich public philosophy. The upshot is that borderless philosophy, together with performance philosophy and public philosophy, collectively yield a fully adequate solution to the problem of irrelevance.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • metaphilosophy
  • Wittgenstein
  • Kant
  • professional philosophy
  • revolution
مراجع
-    Appiah, K.A. (2006) Cosmopolitanism: Ethics in a World of Strangers. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
-    Arendt, H., Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil. Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Penguin, 1977.
-    Barnes, J. (2011) “A Candid View of Candide.” The Guardian (1 July 2011). Available online at URL = <https://www.theguardian.com/books/2011/jul/01/candide-voltaire-rereading-julian-barnes>.
-    Celluci, C. (2018) “Philosophy at a Crossroads: Escaping from Irrelevance.” Syzetesis 5: 13-53. Aavailable online at URL = <http://www.syzetesis.it/documenti/archivio/anno5/f1/3%20ARTICOLO%20CELLUCCI.pdf>.
-    Duhigg, C., “What Google Learned From Its Quest to Build the Perfect Team.” New York Times (25 February 2016). Available online at URL = <http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/28/magazine/what-google-learned-from-its-quest-to-build-the-perfect-team.html
-    Gauss, E.M. and Totzke, R. (2015) “On Performative Philosophy—10 impulses for Discussion From [soundcheck philosophie],” Performance Philosophy 1: 74-94. Available online at URL = <http://www.performancephilosophy.org/journal/article/view/30>.
-    Hanna, R. (2019a) THE RATIONAL HUMAN CONDITION, Vol. 1, Preface and General Introduction, Supplementary Essays, and General Bibliography. New York: Nova Science.
-    Hanna, R. (2019b) THE RATIONAL HUMAN CONDITION, Vol. 2, Deep Freedom and Real Persons: A Study in Metaphysics. New York: Nova Science.
-    Hanna, R. (2019c) THE RATIONAL HUMAN CONDITION, Vol. 3, Kantian Ethics and Human Existence: A Study in Moral Philosophy. New York: Nova Science.
-    Hanna, R. (2019d) THE RATIONAL HUMAN CONDITION, Vol. 4, Kant, Agnosticism, and Anarchism: A Theological-Political Treatise. New York: Nova Science.
-    Hanna, R. (2015) Cognition, Content, and the A Priori: A Study in the Philosophy of Mind and Knowledge (aka THE RATIONAL HUMAN CONDITION, Vol. 5). Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
-    Kropotkin, P. (1910) “Anarchism.” Enyclopedia Britannica (1910). Available online at URL = <http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/ kropotkin-peter/1910/britannica.htm>.
-    Lem, S. (1992) “King Globares and the Sages.” In S. Lem, Mortal Engines. Trans. M. Kandel. New York: Harcourt Books. Pp. 101-113.
-    Marx, K. (1964) Selected Writings in Sociology & Social Philosophy. Trans. T. Bottomore. New York: McGraw-Hill.
-    Meagher, S.M., and Feder, E.K. (2010) “Practicing Public Philosophy.” Public Philosophy Network. (2010-present). Available online at URL = <http://publicphilosophynetwork.ning.com/page/history-of-the-ppn>.
-    Milosz, C. (1955) The Captive Mind. Trans. J. Zielonko. New York: Vintage Books.
-    MIT Center for Collective Intelligence. (2018). Available online at URL = <http://cci.mit.edu/>.
-    Performance Philosophy Network. (2012-present). Available online at URL = <http://performancephilosophy.ning.com/>.
-    Reginald, H. et al. (2018) Borderless Philosophy 1 (2018). Available online at URL = <https://www.cckp.space/publications-cskp>.
-    Reginald, H. et al. (2017-present) “Philosophy without Borders.” Patreon. Available online at URL = <https://www.patreon.com/philosophywithout borders>.
-    Russell, B. (1918) Proposed Roads to Freedom: Socialism, Anarchism and Syndicalism. Cornwall, NY: Cornwall Press, 1918. Available online at URL = <http://www.zpub.com/notes/rfree10.html>.
-    Schiller, F. (2018) “Letters on the Aesthetic Education of Humanity.” (Trans. of the title modified slightly). Available online at URL = <http://www.gutenberg.org/files/6798/6798-h/6798-h.htm>.
-    Schmidt, J. (2000) Disciplined Minds: A Critical Look at Salaried Professionals and the Soul-Battering System That Shapes Their Lives. New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield.
-    Shields, P., Shields, P., and Shields, N. (2009) “GRE Scores by Discipline.” Detached Ideas (4 January 2009). Available online at URL = <http://www.arisbe.com/detached/?p=1905>.
-    Wikipedia. (2018) “Collective Intelligence.” Available online at URL = <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collective_intelligence>.
-    Woolley, A.W., Aggarwal, I., and Malone, T.W. (2015) “Collective Intelligence and Group Performance.” Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24 (2015): 420-424.
-    W, X, Y, & Z. (2013-present). Against Professional Philosophy. Available online at URL = <http://againstprofphil.org/>.
-    Z. (2017) “On Philosophical Failures.” Against Professional Philosophy (4 October 2017). Available online at URL = <http://againstprofphil.org/on-philosophical-failures/>.
-    Z. (2016) “Hyper-Disciplined Minds: Professional Philosophy and the Death of Dissent.” Against Professional Philosophy (26 February 2016). Available online at URL = <http://againstprofphil.org/hyper-disciplined-minds-the-professionalization -of-philosophy-and-the-death-of-dissent/>.
ارسال نظر در مورد این مقاله
CAPTCHA Image
مجله پژوهش های فلسفی
دوره 12، شماره 24 - شماره پیاپی 24
مقالات
مهر 1397
صفحه 55-82
فایل ها
هم رسانی
ارجاع به این مقاله
آمار