مجله پژوهش های فلسفی

Journal of Philosophical Investigations

شماره جاری

بر اساس شماره‌های نشریه

بر اساس نویسندگان

بر اساس موضوعات

نمایه نویسندگان

نمایه کلیدواژه ها

درباره نشریه

اهداف و چشم انداز

اعضای هیات تحریریه

فرایند پذیرش مقالات

اصول اخلاقی انتشار مقاله

بانک ها و نمایه نامه ها

پرسش‌های متداول

اخبار و اعلانات

پیوندهای مفید

Transformation and Transcendence of Artistic Form in Plato's Aesthetic Theory

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی- پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه فلسفه هنر، واحد اردبیل، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اردبیل، ایران

2 استادیار گروه فلسفه، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، اردبیل، ایران

چکیده

Nowadays, although our aesthetic ideas are based on modern theories and perspectives that have pervaded the art, the root of western tradition of art dates back to Greek and Roman art tradition. Theory of form in art tries to emphasize the materiality of artistic object, though in later theories, it has been more flexible and proposes issues such as content and function, as well as attributing concepts such as composition, color, technique etc. to the artwork. Plato by proposing mimesis theory and expanding its scope considered a pattern and framework for attitudes and thoughts in static arts such as painting, literature and dynamic performance arts such as drama and music, and managed to regulate and organize them. For Plato, in this process, ēthos functions as a determinant factor.  This present study is an attempt to discuss this question with descriptive-analytical approach: “will artistic form in Plato's theories be important after proposing the representational attitude toward art?” The results demonstrated that Plato's samples of beauty, in addition to descriptions and implications about the features of artistic form in some conversations can be considered equal to artistic form and due to the reflective theory in its revolution process, artistic form development into transcendence ethical form.


کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Transformation and Transcendence of Artistic Form in Plato's Aesthetic Theory

نویسندگان [English]

  • Camellia Talei Bafghi 1
  • Maryam Soltani Kouhanestani 2

1 Department of philosophy of art,, Ardabil branch, Islamic Azad University,, Ardabil, Iran.

2 Assistant professor, Department of Philosophy, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran

چکیده [English]

Nowadays, although our aesthetic ideas are based on modern theories and perspectives that have pervaded the art, the root of western tradition of art dates back to Greek and Roman art tradition. Theory of form in art tries to emphasize the materiality of artistic object, though in later theories, it has been more flexible and proposes issues such as content and function, as well as attributing concepts such as composition, color, technique etc. to the artwork. Plato by proposing mimesis theory and expanding its scope considered a pattern and framework for attitudes and thoughts in static arts such as painting, literature and dynamic performance arts such as drama and music, and managed to regulate and organize them. For Plato, in this process, ēthos functions as a determinant factor.  This present study is an attempt to discuss this question with descriptive-analytical approach: “will artistic form in Plato's theories be important after proposing the representational attitude toward art?” The results demonstrated that Plato's samples of beauty, in addition to descriptions and implications about the features of artistic form in some conversations can be considered equal to artistic form and due to the reflective theory in its revolution process, artistic form development into transcendence ethical form.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Artistic form
  • Ethical form
  • ethos
  • Mimesis
  • Plato
مراجع
-       Aristotle (1985). The Complete Works of Aristotle, The Revised Oxford Translation, Ed. ‎Jonathan Barnes, USA: Princeton University Press.
-       Atkinson, Paul et al (2000). Qualitative Researching with Text, Image and Sound, U.S.A:  Sage Publications Ltd.
-       Beardsley, C. Monroe (1966). Aestheticsfrom Classical Greece to the Present, the University of Alabama Press, United States.
-       Beheshti, Mohamad Reza. (2009). Aesthetics & Philosophy of Art in Dialogue: Plato, Ed. Monireh Panjtani Farhanegstan Honar, Tehran. {in Persian}
-       Brandwood, Leonard. (2010) The chronology of Plato's dialogues, England: Cambridge University Press.
-       Broadie, Sarah (2011). Nature and Divinity in Plato's Timaeus, England: Cambridge University Press.
-       Carroll, Noël. (2002). Philosophy of Art a contemporary introduction, London and New York: Routledge.
-       Copleston, Frederick (1993). A History ofPhilosophy, Volume I, New York: Doubleday.
-       Fichner-Rathus, Lois (2012). Foundations of Art and Design, Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
-       Gebauer, Gunter & Wulf, Christoph (1995). Mimesis: Culture - Art – Society, U.S.A: University of California Press.
-       Garver, Eugene (1994). Aristotle's Rhetoric: An Art of Character, Chicago, IL:  university of Chicago Press.
-       Halliwell, Stephen. (2010). Plato on Art and Beauty, London: Palgrave Macmillan, London.
-       Halliwell (2002).  The Aesthetics of Mimesis: Ancient Texts and Modern Problems, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
-       Hornby, A.S. (2010). Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary, Oxford University Press, 7TH edition, New York.
-       Huntsman, Penny. (2016). AboutArt: A Thematic Guide to Art History, Wiley-Blackwell, London.
-       Irwin, Terence (2007). The Development of Ethics, Volume I, England: Oxford University Press.
-       J.Smith, Tyler & Plantzos, Dimitris (2012). A Companion toGreek Art, Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
-       Keuls, Eva C. (1997). Plato and Greek Painting, Columbia Studies in the Classical Tradition, New York.
-       Keuls (1997). Painter and Poet in Ancient Greece: Iconography and the Literary Arts.
-       -K. Duke, Rodney (2005). Rhetoric, Ethic, and Moral Persuasion in Biblical Discourse, Ed. Thomas H. Olbricht, Anders Eriksson, London: Bloomsbury T&T Clark.
-       -Lodge, David (1990). After Bakhtin: Essays on Fiction and Criticism, London: Routledge.
-       -Melberg, A. (1995). Theories of Mimesis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-       M.sattler, William (1947). Conceptions of ethos in ancient rhetoric, Speech Monographs, Vol. 14, Iss. 1-2, pp 55-65.
-       -Newall, Diana and ‎Pooke, Grant. (2008). Art History: The Basics, London: Routledge.
-       Nair, Sreenath (2007). Restoration of Breath (Consciousness Literature & the Arts), Amsterdam-New York: Rodopi.
-       O. Sloane, Thomas. (2001). Encyclopedia of Rhetoric, England: Oxford University Press,
-       Plato.  (1996). The Dialogues of Plato, No 7. Translated by: B. Jowett. Printed in: Great Books of the Western World. Encyclopedia
-       Plato (1997). Complete Works, Ed. John Cooper, associate editor D. S. Hutchinson, Hackett Publishing Company, Indianapolis/Cambridge.
-       Britannica, INC.
-       Plato (2002). Collected Dialogues, Ed. E. Hamilton & H. Cairns, Princeton University Press.
-       Proscurcin Junior, Pedro. (2014). Der Begriff Ethos bei Homer: Beitrag zu einer philosophischen Interpretation, Universitätsverlag Winter, German.
-       Penner, Terry et al (2007). Pursuing The Good: Ethics and Metaphysics in Plato’s Republic, Edinburgh University Press.
-       -Rockmore, Tom (2013). Art and Truth after Plato, University of Chicago Press.
-       Sheppard, Anne. (1987). Aesthetics: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Art, England: Oxford University Press.
-       Summers, David (2007). Vision, Reflection, and Desire in Western Painting, the University of North Carolina Press.
-       Webster, Merriam. (1984). Merriam Webster's Dictionary of Synonyms, U.S.A: Springfield, Massachusetts.
-       Xenophon. (1997). Memorabilia, Translated by E. C. Marchant, London: Harvard University Press.
ارسال نظر در مورد این مقاله
CAPTCHA Image
مجله پژوهش های فلسفی
دوره 14، شماره 32 - شماره پیاپی 32
مقالات
آذر 1399
صفحه 316-331
فایل ها
هم رسانی
ارجاع به این مقاله
آمار