نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی- پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشیار دانشگاه شهید مدنی آذربایجان، تبریز. ایران
2 دانش آموخته کارشناسی ارشد ادیان و عرفان، دانشگاه شهید مدنی آذربایجان، تبریز، ایران
چکیده
The main challenge of present paper is analytical comparing the “Criterion of Valid Cognition” from viewpoints of Epicureanism and Charvaka (Lokayata) philosophy, the largest exponent of Indian materialism,. The new findings of the research show that the whole construction of ontology, ethics, and infidelity of Charvaka is logically based on its epistemology. In this philosophy, any intangible existence is denied, and the only knowledgeable subject-matter is assumed to be the material world. So here firstly, the acquisition of the truth is possible solely by sensory instruments, and secondly, every ‘should’ and ‘should not’ that it is in contrary to the principle of material pleasure is negated. It can be said that the Charvaka’s philosophers consider Cognition as the ‘true and perceptible belief, but not reasonable one’, and they intensely questioned the validity of Inference, Testimony and Analogy. In contrast, the Epicurean philosophers seem to agree with the definition of Cognition as the ‘true and justifiable conviction’. In spite of believing in the originality of matter and regarding the ‘clarity of sensory perception’ as the criterion of truth, Epicureans consider also Inference, General Concepts and Emotions as the resources of cognition. Epicureanism’s epistemology is entirely rational, but that of Charvaka is irrational, empirical, contradictory, sense-based and contrary to Reality.
کلیدواژه‌ها
عنوان مقاله [English]
the criterion of truth in Epicureanism and Carvaka philosophy
نویسندگان [English]
- Sajjad Dehghanzadeh 1
- Fatemeh Ahmadian 2
- Zeinab Mirhosseini 2
1 Associate professor, Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University-Tabriz-Iran
2 M.A. in religions and mysticism, theology, Azerbaijan shahid madani university, Tabriz, Iran
چکیده [English]
The main challenge of present paper is analytical comparing the “Criterion of Valid Cognition” from viewpoints of Epicureanism and Charvaka (Lokayata) philosophy, the largest exponent of Indian materialism,. The new findings of the research show that the whole construction of ontology, ethics, and infidelity of Charvaka is logically based on its epistemology. In this philosophy, any intangible existence is denied, and the only knowledgeable subject-matter is assumed to be the material world. So here firstly, the acquisition of the truth is possible solely by sensory instruments, and secondly, every ‘should’ and ‘should not’ that it is in contrary to the principle of material pleasure is negated. It can be said that the Charvaka’s philosophers consider Cognition as the ‘true and perceptible belief, but not reasonable one’, and they intensely questioned the validity of Inference, Testimony and Analogy. In contrast, the Epicurean philosophers seem to agree with the definition of Cognition as the ‘true and justifiable conviction’. In spite of believing in the originality of matter and regarding the ‘clarity of sensory perception’ as the criterion of truth, Epicureans consider also Inference, General Concepts and Emotions as the resources of cognition. Epicureanism’s epistemology is entirely rational, but that of Charvaka is irrational, empirical, contradictory, sense-based and contrary to Reality.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
- Keywords: Charvaka
- Epicureans
- Valid Cognition
- Materialism
- Sensory Perception
- Acharya, Madhava, (1882), the sarva-Darsana-Samgraha. London, Trubner& co: Ludgate Hill.
- Adou, Pierre, (2003), What Is Ancient Philosophy? Translated by Abbas bagheri, Tehran: Elm. {in Persian}
- Amireh Helmi, Matar, (1998), Greek Philosophy: its History and Problems, Cairo: Jameat {in Arabic}
- Amis, Elizabeth, (2009), Epicurean Empiricism, James Warren ed. Cambridge Companion to Epicureanism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
- Bern, John, (2002), The Epicurean Philosophy, Translated by Abolghasem Pour-Hosseini, Tehran: Amir Kabir.
- Bhattacharya, Haridas, (1953), The Cultural Heritage of India, Calcutta: The Ramakrishna Mission Institute of Culture.
- Bhattacharya, Ramkrishna, (2013), The Best Text and Its Commentaeies: Problems of Representing and Understanding the Charvaka, Lokayata. pp. 133- 149.
- Breih, Emile, (1995), The History of Philosophy, Vol. 2, Translated by Ali Morad Davoudi, Tehran: Markaze Nashre Daneshgahi. {in Persian}
- Chatterjee, Dipankar (1997). Philosophy East and West, no. 2, Dialogue in Skepticism: University of Hawaii Press, pp. 195- 209.
- Chatterjee, Satish Chandra, & Datta, Dhrindra Mohan, (2005), An Introduction to Indian Philosophy, Translated by Farnaz Nazerzadeh Kermani, Qom: Adyan Va Mazaheb. {in Persian}
- Copleston, Frederick, (1983), A History of Philosophy, Trans: Seyyed Jalaleddin Mojtabavi, Tehran: Elmi Va Farhangi. {in Persian}
- Course, Core. (2011), The Systems of Indian Philosophy. India: University of Calcutta.
- Issue 82, Pages 143-167.
- Damodaran, k. (1967), Indian Thought: a Critical Survey, New Delhi.
- Dasgupta, Shashibhusan. (1946), Obscure Religious Cults. India: University of Calcutta.
- Dasgupta, Surendranath. (1922), A History of Indian Philosophy, New York: Cambridge at the university.
- Dawning, Christine, (1989), "Hellenistic Religions" in: Encyclopedia of Religion, ed. Eliade, Mircea. New York: Macmillan.
- Dehghanzade, Sajad, & Ahmadian, Fatemeh, (2016), "A Comparative Study of Hedonism in Charvaka and Epicurean Philosophies", Journal of Philosophical Theological Research (JPTR), Term 18, issue 63, pp. 143-167 {in Persian}
- Durant, Will, (1999), The Story Of Civilization, Editor`s in Head: Mahmoud Masaeb, Tehran: Elmi Va Farhangi, (E-book). {in Persian}
- Frast, S. E, (2009), Basic Teachings of the Great Philosophers, Translated by Gholam Hossein Tavakkoli, Tehran: Hekmat. {in Persian}
- Gottlieb, Anthony, (2005), The Dream of Reason: A History Of Philosophy From The Greeks To The Renaissance, Translated by Leila Sazegar, Tehran: Ghoghnous. {in Persian}
- Gupta, Bina, (1981), "Skepticism: Ancient East & Modern West", Indian Philosophical Quarterly, IX, No. 1.
- Gupta, G. P, (2000), Humanism: An Overview, Global Religious Vision.
- Houman, Mahmoud, (2006), Philosophical Discourses: A Report of Abdul Ali Dastgheib , Shiraz: Navide Shiraz. {in Persian}
- Karam, Yousef, (1936), History of Greek philosophy, Nasher Lejana Al-ta’lif Va Al-tarjoma Va Alnashr. {in Arabic}
- Kaviraj, Gopinath. (1968), Aspects of Indian Thought. Calcutta: The University of Burdwan.
- King, Richard, (2000), Indian Philosophy: An introduction to Hindu & Buddhist Thought, New Delhi: Edinburgh University Press.
- Laertius, Diogenes, (2008), Greek Philosophers, Translated by Behrad Rahmni, Tehran: Nashr-e Markaz. {in Persian}
- Mahdavi, Yahya, (1997), Skeptics of Greece , Translated by Kharazmi. {in Persian}
- Mehrin, Mehrdad, (1963), Eastern Philosophy, Tehran: Atayi. {in Persian}
- Mills, Ethan, (2013), The Dependent Origination of Skepticism in Classical India: An Experiment In Cross-Cultural Philosophy, New Mexico: The University of New Mexico
- Mittal, Sushil and Thursby Gene. (2007), The Hindu Word. London and New York: Rutledge.
- Moallemi, Hassan, (2000), Negahi be Marefatshenasi dar Falsafe Gharb, Tehran: Moasseseye Farhangie Danesh Va Andishe Mo’aser {in Persian}
- Moen, ole Martin, (2012), Because it Feels good: A Hedonistic Theory of Intrinsic Value. Norway: University of Oslo.
- Mostafa Kamal, M. (1998), "the Epistemology of The Charvaka Philosophy". Journal of Indian & Buddhist Studies .Vol. 46. no. 2.
- Radhakrishnan, Sarvepalli, (1985), History of East and West Philosophy, Translated by Khosro Jahandari, Tehran: Enghelab. {in Persian}
- Sanskrit, B. A. (2011), Introduction to Indian Philosophy. India: University of Calcutta.
- Sen, M. A. (1998), Philosophy of the Vedanta. Calcutta: Oriental Publishing House.
- Shayegan, Daryoush, (2010), Religions and philosophical schools of India, Tehran: Amir Kabir. {in Persian}
- Tim, O'Keefe, 2010, Epicureanism, Durham, UK: Acumen
- Vihari Joshi, Rasik, (1987), Lokayata In Ancient India & China, Annals of the Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute, non. 1/4, pp. 393- 405,
- Warren Myers, Michael. (2001), Brahman: A Comparative Theology. Britain: Curzon Press.
- Werner, Charles, (1994), Greek Wisdom, Translated by Bozorg Naderzadeh, Tehran: Elmi Va Farhangi{in Persian}
)
ارسال نظر در مورد این مقاله