Enlightenment and Domination: Foucault on Critique of Enlightenment’s Emancipation Discourse

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Assistant Professor of Philosophy Department, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Michel Foucault is well-known as a contemporary representative of counter-Enlightenment. His analyses bring to light finely a self-deception committed by social and political institutions inherited from Enlightenment which, in spite of their progressive, more humane self-image, facilitate domination and subjugation more than before. Based on some hints from Rorty, Habermas and Walzer, I would show that Foucault’s analyses presuppose some crypto-normativity, despite his persistent refusal of using such normative concepts as truth, emancipation, reform and progress. In his work, the concept of ‘power’ is constantly fluctuating between two meanings: neutral, descriptive on the one hand, and pejorative, normative on the other hand. Foucault’s fear of being bounded to a specific position subjected unconsciously to a ubiquitous power, related to first meaning, prevents him from making an invidious distinction between emancipatory and authoritative aspects of social and political disciplinary institutions. I would argue that this ambiguity of power concept makes him biased towards emancipatory contribution of Enlightenment.‏

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  • Bartky, S. (1988) ‘Foucault, femininity and the modernisation of patriarchal power’, in I. iamond and L. Quinby (eds), Feminism and Foucault: Reflections of Resistance, Boston: North Eastern University Press, pp. 60–85.
  • Foucault, Michel (1965) Madness and Civilisation: A History of Insanity in the Age of Reason, trans. Richard Howard, New York: Vintage Books.
  • Foucault, Michel (1972) Power/ Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977, trans. Colin Gordon & Others, New York: Pantheon Books.
  • Foucault, Michel (1978) The History of Sexuality, Vol. I: An Introduction, trans. Robert Hurley, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
  • Foucault, Michel (1981) ‘The order of discourse’, in R. Young (ed.), Untying the Text: A Post-structuralist Reader, London: Routledge, Kegan and Paul, pp. 48–79.
  • Foucault, Michel (1986) “Kant on Enlightenment and revolution”, Economy and Society, 15(1): 88-96
  • Foucault, Michel (1995) Discipline and Punish: The birth of the Prison, Translated by A. Sheridan, New York: Vintage Books.
  • Foucault (1996) “What is critique?”, in What Is Enlightenment? Eighteenth-Century Answers and Twentieth-Century Questions, edit. James Schmidt, Berkely: University of California Press.
  • Foucault (2001) Power. 3 of The Essential Works of Foucault, 1954–1984. Edit. J. Faubion. Trans. R. Hurley et al. London: Allen Lane/Penguin.
  • Habermas, Jürgen (1987) The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity, trans. Frederick Lawrence, Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Mills, Sara (2003) Michel Foucault, London & New York: Routledge.
  • Nouri, Morteza (2016a) “The Frankfort School’s critique of Enlightenment and its evaluation from Richard Rorty’s point of view”, at Biannual of Journal of Qarbšenâsi-ye Bonyâdi (Occidental Studies), 7(14): 125-146.
  • Nouri, Morteza (2016b) “Communitarian critiques of Liberalism and its evaluation from Richard Rorty’s point of view”, at At The quarterly of Journal of Philosophical Investigations, 10(19): 409-444.
  • Nouri, Morteza (2020) “Legal Interpretivism versus Legal Pragmatism: an Assessment”, at The quarterly of Journal of Philosophical Investigations, 14(30): 101-121.
  • Rabinow, Paul (1986) The Foucault Reader, Harmondsworth: Peregrine.
  • Rawls, John (1999) A theory of Justice: Revised Edition, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Rorty, Richard (1982) Consequences of Pragmatism, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Rorty, Richard (1989) Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Rorty, Richard (1991) Essays on Heidegger and Others, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Rorty, Richard (2001) “The Continuity Between the Enlightenment and 'Postmodernism'” in What's Left of Enlightenment: A Postmodern Question, Edit. Keith Michael Baker; Peter HannsReill, Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
  • Sandel, Michael (1982) Liberalism and the Limits of Justice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Walzer, Michael (1986) “The Politics of Michel Foucault” in Foucault: A Critical Reader, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Send comment about this article
CAPTCHA Image

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics