Assessing the Epistemological Status of Certainty in Wittgenstein through the Lens of Critical Rationalism

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 PhD Candidate of Philosophy of Science Department, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

2 Professor, The Islamic College (affiliated with Middlesex University) UK; Adjunct Professor, National Research Institute for Science Policy, Iran

Abstract

"Certainty" occupies an important place in Wittgenstein’s epistemology: it does not belong to the category of knowledge but constitutes its foundation. In his view, knowledge boils down to language games, and language games are based on indubitable certainties. According to Wittgenstein, scepticism is meaningless, and if there is no certainty, then even doubt would be meaningless. Wittgesntein maintains that [relative] doubt and knowledge are epistemic categories, whereas absolute doubt and certainty are non-epistemic categories. Epistemic categories are meaningful and when expressed by means of statements could be either true or false. In contrast, non-epistemic categories are meaningless and when expressed by means of statements the properties of truth and falsehood do not apply to them. The aim of the present paper is two fold: 1- Providing an explanation of the status of certainty in comparison to categories such as doubt and knowledge in Wittgenstein’s thought; 2- Providing a critical assessment of Wittgenstein's approach to certainty through the prism of critical rationalism. The main arguments of the paper are as follows: 1. Although Wittgenstein considers certainty to be meaningless and therefore not on a par with epistemological categories, he regards it as an objective concept that functions as the foundation upon which all human knowledge is based; 2. Wittgenstein's efforts to show the objectivity of certainty have not been entirely successful, partly due to his reliance on a defective notion of ‘objectivity’ and partly as a result of the prominence he assigns to the category of ‘meaning’ at the expense of the category of ‘truth’.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  • Ben-Menahem, Yemima (2006) Conventionalism. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Bloor, David (1991) Knowledge and Social Imagery (Second). USA: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Dilman, Ilham (2002) Wittgenstein’s Copernican Revolution, The Question of Linguistic Idealism. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Fogelin, Robert J. (1987) Wittgenstein. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Gier, Nicholas F. (1981) Wittgenstein and Phenomenology. USA: State University of New York Press.
  • Hanna, Joseph F. (2004) "The Scope and Limits of Scientific Objectivity". Philosophy of Science, 71(3): 339-361.
  • Kant, Immanuel (1999) Critique of Pure Reason. (A. W. Wood & P. Guyer, trans.). USA: Cambridge University Press.
  • Klein, Peter D. (1984) Certainty: A Refutation of Scepticism. USA: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Musgrave, Alan (2016) "Metaphysics and Realism". in J. Shearmur & G. Stokes (eds.), (J. Shearmur & G. Stokes, eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Popper (pp. 208-229). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Popper, Karl (1972) Objective Knowledge, an Evolutionary Approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Popper, Karl (2000) In Search of a Better World. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Popper, Karl. (2005a) Realism and The Aim Of Science. (W. W. Bartley, ed.). London and New York: Routledge.
  • Popper, Karl. (2005b) Unended Quest, an Intellectual Autobiography. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Popper, Karl (2007) All Life Is Problem Solving. (P. Camiller, trans.). London and New York: Routledge
  • Popper, Karl (2013) The Open Society and Its Enemies. The United States and Canada: Princeton University Press.
  • Quine, Willard Van Orman (2013) Word and Object. (D. Follesdal, ed.). London: Cambridge, the MIT Press.
  • Stroll, Avrum (1994) Moore and Wittgenstein on Certainty. New York: Oxford University Press, Inc.
  • Van Peursen, C. A. (1959) "Edmund Husserl and Ludwig Wittgenstein". Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, (20): 181-197.
  • Williams, Bernard (1973) "Wittgenstein and Idealism". Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures, 7: 76-95.
  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1969) On Certainty. (G. E. M. Anscombe & G. H. von Wright, eds., D. Paul & G. E. M. Anscombe, trans.). Britain: Basil Blackwell.
  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1998) Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics. (G. H. von Wright, R. Rhees, & G. E. M. Anscombe, eds., G. E. M. Anscombe, trans.) (Third edition). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig (2007) Zettel. (G. E. Anscombe & G. von Wright, eds., G. E. Anscombe, trans.). Berkeley and Los Angeles, California: Basil Blackwell.
Send comment about this article
CAPTCHA Image
Journal of Philosophical Investigations
Volume 16, Issue 38 - Serial Number 38
Articles
2022
Pages 670-705

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics