Journal of Philosophical Investigations

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Professor of Philosophy Department, Allameh Tabatabaei University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

The analysis of the issue of "Non Being" in the philosophy of Heidegger particularly in his later works, and the position he considers for "Non Being" in achieving the reality of Being and discloseness, is of great importance in the history of western philosophy. Heidegger puts forward this issue in a variety of places, including the explanation of Dasein and Existence (Existenz) and in leading to ontological relations in an affirmative not negative way. He demonstrates Dasein in a course toward "Non Being" and in the state of anxiety (Angst). From the other hand, it seems that the concept of "Non Being" in Chinese schools of philosophy is considered to be among original and leading concepts. In Chinese thinking, intertwining of Being (Yu) and Non Being (Wu) is deemed to be an effective factor for understanding the unity and coherence among forces and phenomena, activities and passivity and giving meaning to the actions among beings (Seinde) which is recognizable with an ontological view. The main issue in this inquiry, is clarifying the characteristic of Non Being and its function in the interaction of "Being" and "Non Being". It has also been tried to make a comparison between the non-nihilistic and non-negative concept of "Non eing" in Chinese philosophy particularly Daoism and Zen Buddhism and Heidegger's thought, and while studying such concepts like "Reality and Openness", "Way" and "Releasement from thinking", the approach toward "Being" would be probed.

Keywords

- Anderson, H.(1959). Introduction to Discourse on Thinking by Martin Heidegger, New York: Harper & Row.
-Benoit, H.(1959).The supreme doctrine, New York: Viking.
- Chang, Chung-yuan.(1970).Commentary on J. Glenn Gray's "Splendor of the simple", Philosophy East and West V.20, P241-246, USA, Honolulu: University Press of Hawaii.
- Eckartsberg, Rolf von and Valle, Ronald S.(1981). Heideggerian Thinking and the Eastern Mind, From: Metaphors of Consciousness, Edited by Ronald S. Valle and Rolf von Eckartsberg, New York and London: Plenum Press.
- Encyclopædia Britannica.(2011). Chinese philosophy: 112694
- Gullette, Alan.(1976).The Concept of Nothing in Zen, Religious Studies 3770: Zen Buddhism, University of Tennessee-Knoxville.
- Heidegger,Martin.(1949). "What is Metaphysics?", translted by R. F. C. Hull and Alan Crick, Chicago: Henry Regnery.
- Heidegger, Martin. (1968). What is called thinking?, New York: Harper & Row. Heidegger, - Martin. (1957), Identity and Difference, translated by Joan Stambaugh, NewYork: Harper & Row, 16.
-Lao Tsu.(1972). Tao te ching, New York: Random House.
-May, Reinhard. (1996).Heidegger's hidden sources: Translated by Graham Parkes, Oxon: Routledge.
-Pang, Pu (1999). Shuo-Wu‘‖ [On ―Nothing‖], in Dang-Dai-Xue-Zhe-Zi-Xuan- Wen-Ku: Pang-Pu-Juan [Selected Works of Contemporary Scholars: Pang Pu] (Hefei: Anhui-Jiao-Yu-Chu-Ban-She), 348-63
- Paluch, S. J.(1970). Heidegger's "What is Metaphysics?” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Vol. 30, No. 4.
-Reid, Gilbert. (1917). "Taoism, an Appreciation", The Biblical World, Vol.49, No. 2, The University of Chicago Press.
-Sheehan, Thomas.(2001). READING HEIDEGGER'S “WHAT IS METAPHYSICS?” The New Yearbook for Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy, Stanford University.
-Steffney, John,(1977),Transmetaphysical thinking in Heidegger and Zen Buddhism, Philosophy East & West, Vol. 27, No. 3. 323-335, USA: University of Hawaii Press.
-Stewart, Harold, Journal of Shin Buddhism, O. Box 3944, Manuka A.C.T. 2603, AUSTRALIA
-Yao, Zhihua. (2010). Typology of nothing: Heidegger, Daoism and Buddhism, Comparative Philosophy, Volume 1, No. 1: 78-89 Open Access / ISSN 2151-6014
- Zhuangzi.(1998).Wandering on the way: early Taoist tales and parables of Chuang Tzu, translated by Victor H. Mair, University of Hawaii Press, (1998)
CAPTCHA Image