Document Type : Research Paper
Author
Assistant Professor of philosophy, Institute for Social and Cultural Studies
Abstract
Kant in Critique of Judgment wants to introduce aesthetical judgment as product of reflective judgment and distinct it from cognitive judgments of understanding in first Critique and ethical judgments of reason in second Critique. Because the third Critique must fill the gap between those two and thus enable communication between two realms of philosophy, it has to establish a relation between faculties of understanding, reason and imagination in aesthetical and teleological reflective. This paper, after introduce the general principles governing on aesthetical reflective judgment and free play of imagination and understanding for abstraction of pure and final form of objects, wants to justify the relation between imagination and reason in art beauty, and its parts, the mechanical arts, and fine art (genuis).
Keywords
- Allison, H. E. (2001), Kant's Theory of Taste, Cambridge University Press, First Published.
- Buchdahl, G. (1996), “The Relation between Understanding and Reason in the Architectonic of Kant’s Philosophy”, Immanuel Kant Critical Assessment. vol. 4.
- Elliott, R. K. (1996), “The Unity of Kant's Critique of Aesthetic Judgment”, Immanuel Kant Critical Assessment. vol.4.
- Freydberg, Bernard (2005), Imagination in Kant's Critique of Practical Reason, Indiana University press.
- Ginsborg, H. (2005), Kant's Aesthetics and Teleology, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
- Gotshalk, D. W. (1996), “Form and Expression in Kant's Aesthetic”, Immanuel Kant Critical Assessment. vol.
- Kemal, S. (1996), “The Importance of Artistic Beauty”, Immanuel Kant, Critical Assessment. vol. 40.
- Kraft, M. (1996), “Kant's Theory of teleology”, Immanuel Kant Critical Assessment. vol. 4.
- Schaper, E. (1996), Taste, Sublimity, and Genius: The aesthetics of nature and art, in The Cambridge Companion to Kant, Cambridge university press.
)
Send comment about this article