Journal of Philosophical Investigations

Document Type : Research Paper


1 Associate Professor of Philosophy, University of Zanjan

2 MA of Philosophy, University of Zanjan


The age of the sign is essentially theological. The system that is based on a basic concept, a concept that shapes the circulation of signs, is essentially theological. This central concept has named in each thought differently: the reality, essence, existence, truth, God, Logos, Nous, End etc. In This logocentric system(s), there is a transcendental signified that means and proves the chain of signification. Deconstructive reading of Derrida showed that there is no signified outside of the chain of signification that makes language to have bound. This revolutionary idea collapses hierarchical significative oppositions, and thus makes signifiers to be rank and homologous. By erasing the oppositions of signifiers, it is nonsense to talk about death of God; there is no death, and no life. We're always in the middle of an eternal play. Word (Logos), yet constantly erased and written and rewritten. A/theology is the absurdity of this claims that theology has terminated; a new a/system for those who lives in borders.


  • Altizer, T. (1979), the Descent into Hell: A Study of the Radical Reversal of the Christian Consciousness, New York: Seabury Press.
  • Aquinas, T. (1947), Summa Theologica, trans. Fathers of the English Dominican Province, Ohio: Perrysburg
  • Deleuze, G. (1972), Proust and Signs, trans. R. Howard, New York: Braziller.
  • Deleuze, G. (1977), Nomad Thought, in the New Nietzsche: Contemporary Styles of Interpretation. New York: Dell.
  • Deleuze, G. (1979), Active and Reactive, in Allison, D, The New Nietzsche: Contemporary Style of Interpretation, New York: Delta.
  • Derrida, J. (1973), Speech and Phenomena and Other Essays on Husserl,s Theory of Signs, trans. Allison, D, B, Evanston, III: Northwestern University Press.
  • Derrida, J. (1976), Of Grammatology, trans. Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak, Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
  • Derrida, J. (1978), Writing and Difference, trans. Alan Bass, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Derrida, J. (1981), dissemination, trans. Johnson, B, Chicago: University if Chicago Press.
  • Hegel G. W. F (1977), Phenomenology of Spirit, trans. A. V. Miller. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Jabès, E. (1976), The Book of Yukel, Return to the Book, trans. Waldrop, R. Middletown, Conn: Wesleyan University Press.
  • Merleau-Ponty M. (1962), Phenomenology of Perception, trans. Smith, C, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  • Miller, J. Hillis (1969), Poets of Reality: Six Twentieth-Century Writers, New York: Atheneum.
  • Miller, J. Hillis (1979), Theology and Logology in Victorian Literature, in Religion and Literature: The Convergence of Approaches, supplement to Journal of the American Academy of Religion,
  • Saussure, F. (1966), Course in General Linguistics, trans. Wade Baskin, New York: McGraw-Hill
  • Taylor, M. C. (1984), ERRING: A Postmodern A/theology, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Vanhoozer K.J (2003), Postmodern Theology, New York: Cambridge University Press